|
lol, I know what your third try was, that's unlucky
|
|
|
|
|
I think I did the same exact thing too.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 6/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I knew my fifth try wouldn't be it because I used a letter that wasn't in the word.
Gave me only one option for the sixth try though.
Which is a word I never heard of
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: I knew my fifth try wouldn't be it because I used a letter that wasn't in the word. Glad I'm not the only one that does that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
This came naturally to One Piece fans
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 4/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
⬜🟩⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 4/6
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 5/6
⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 5/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I think a lot of us were one letter off with the second to last guess.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 3/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 4/6
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 779 3/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian Fusion for me.
modified 6-Aug-23 22:34pm.
|
|
|
|
|
me too
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Con-fusion to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
They weren't claiming that it was ready for industry.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
"... net energy gain" is not net energy gain .
"will pave the way for ... future of clean power” in one-hundred years . by then wind solar geo-thermal wave tides will do the trick .
|
|
|
|
|
I think we agree.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
#Worldle #562 1/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Any phone experts around?
In ISDN, the subscriber could distribute incoming calls on the subaddress: 2345678#1 could go to his fax machine, 2345678#2 to the PC, 2345678#3 to his teenage daughter's phone, and so on. All ISDN phone. This "routing" was done on subscriber premises, the network wasn't at all, except by carrying a # and numeric subaddress in the destination field. (In private homes, the "routing" was usually as simple as having the different devices set up to answer calls only if their subaddress was included with the number - all the devices listned to the same bus.)
I never saw much use of this. I tested that it worked, but never put it to any use - mostly because 95% of potential callers responded with "Say what??" when I told them that they cold go directly to, say, my daughter's phone by appending #3 to our phone number.
I never studied GSM/smartphone protocols and specifications, so I ask those who did: Do the protocols we use for mobile phones today have a similar subaddress mechanism? If it is defined, but optional: Is is commonly supported?
Usually, a mobile phone doesn't provide a bus connecting various devices, so my suggested use is another: If you have a 'switchboard' owning the subscriber number (2345678), and a large number of internet SIP devices, without traditional phone functionality: The switchboard could maintain a mapping between subaddress and SIP address, and forward incoming calls to the proper SIP address. It would work even if the called party is out of office, but with a SIP device (say, a portable PC with SIP software) in reach of a WiFi network.
The problem with IP telephony is that you can't tell your contacts 'Call me on number so-and-so'. Today, all land lines (in this country, Norway) are really IP phones, the old phone network is completely torn down. They do a phone number to SIP address mapping, but they won't give you access to the SIP protocol. All you get access to is POTS analog interface that can handle a 1930 vintage phone. You can set up your own SIP phone network, but then you have no interworking with neither POTS, ISDN or cellular networks. If we could use subadressing for the devices in the SIP network, you wouldn't need a separate phone subscription and physical interworking device for each SIP device in the network.
|
|
|
|
|
My information is ~20 years out of date (GSM 2G network), but I don't remember such an option. What you did have was an ability to specify the protocol (voice, data, fax(?)), so the same subscriber equipment could potentially serve multiple purposes.
Thinking about it, the facility you describe would be less useful for mobile phones than it is for fixed phones. The mobile network must track the location of each phone, so each phone must have its own ID. Why complicate things by adding such a facility at the network level?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|