|
Yeah it’s a good point that if you see the link then you should know where it goes.
It’s just more about the fact that all these GDPR email are coming suddenly.
Of course an email reset email you have recently requested and are expecting it. These other ones come randomly and expect you to click a link.
|
|
|
|
|
011111100010 wrote: Surely you click on password reset links, right?
Very rarely these days.
Usually, the email has a code to type into a web page you've already seen.
Or better, the code is sent via SMS to my phone.
|
|
|
|
|
The best part of all these GDPR updates is that they mostly have unsubscribe links!
<hr>
"Qulatiy is Job #1"
|
|
|
|
|
Is defaced when you are banned from social media?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That would be a closed book to me.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's what happens when you behave like a twit and they throw the book at you. If you have more pinterest in the subject, I suggest you find a scholarly article on the subject and reddit. You may stumbleupon some interesting information that might make for delicious reading. Alternatively, you may not digg it.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
If we pretend it's a contest, you win.
The answer to OG the OP's question is: "Blessing In Disguise" is the proper description.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Well, get right on that. Wiki- wiki.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is some incredible detail in that image. I really wish it was in color though.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a Dance Macabre of two skeletons
|
|
|
|
|
I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax
Is this even a syntax??
modified 24-May-18 9:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
I will up the ante with a single (curse) word:
DCOM.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCOM: Disney Channel Original Movies.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
If only it were that innocent...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
They do have a Princess Protection Program[^]. You can try to enroll.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
lw@zi wrote: You can try to enroll
Why? I am neither a princess, nor do I require protection.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
My ignorance protects me from what I suppose would be a lethal mind attack.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Google "IBM JCL". Any further description (or link to such) would be more appropriate to the Soapbox.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I already did, my ignorance lies in the lack of direct experience with that... I can understand it's hellish but I don't have the pain receptors reflexively triggered
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I taught IBM JCL for 2 years. After a while, I actually got to understand why they did things the way they did, and realized that present day classes and configurations are no better.
BTW, IBM mainframes did not get hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Patin wrote: IBM mainframes did not get hacked.
Given that TCP/IP was only designed in 1974, that the Internet ("World Wide Web") only took off in the early 1990's, and that very few people can afford to read their mail or surf the 'net on a mainframe, that's not really surprising.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought that someone would come up with this, but the fact is that IBM mainframes had security built in that would make most current hacks impossible. I've recently read that some of those security features are now being considered for microprocessors. Sorry, I don't have the details in ready memory right now, but I had to both attend and lecture courses in which those hardware minutia were described in detail.
|
|
|
|