|
Quite possibly, but we need more proof.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
And do clothes fall off when drinking Tequila?
I'm not sure how many cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
No I'm pretty sure it's Mezcal...the worm is what does it.
I'm not sure how many cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
No so much, but it does sometimes disappear completely.
|
|
|
|
|
The quotation mentions rebuilding an Excel sheet to some web application.
"This process must be as simple and correct as possible."
Not "as correct as possible", just correct.
If it's any less correct than "correct" it's not correct
I wonder, if they mention correctness explicitly at this point, does that mean all other points are assumed to be incorrect by default?
|
|
|
|
|
You may be correct there.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
"This process must be as simple [PAUSE] and correct as possible."
With the verb form of "correct" rather than the adjective form.
|
|
|
|
|
What about "and correct if possible"?
Or "and correct if you pay extra for our special 'correctness module'"
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. "Fix any detected deficiencies when fiscally sound."
|
|
|
|
|
Correctness is a feature, after all
|
|
|
|
|
Correctness costs money and hinders performance.
|
|
|
|
|
You're starting to sound like EA Games ... DownLoadableCorrectness, anyone?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
EA, it's in the game (provided you bought all DLCs)!
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: our special 'correctness module'
For those times you must ensure you are correctly correct!
|
|
|
|
|
Someone did not like the other thread and so it is locked now. I didn't take any offence to what you said and I hope you weren't offended by what I said but someone didn't like it.
Anyway, I have no idea how to make it any more clear to you and no, I do not troll. So, we'll have to agree to disagree I suppose.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
ZurdoDev wrote: I didn't take any offence to what you said and I hope you weren't offended by what I said but someone didn't like it. Me neither
ZurdoDev wrote: Anyway, I have no idea how to make it any more clear to you and no, I do not troll. So, we'll have to agree to disagree I suppose. I got a feeling we agreed on something, but some misunderstanding took it away.
So let's say we give it the benefit of the doubt and agree to agree on whatever it is we agreed on
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Correct to how many decimal places?
|
|
|
|
|
I've actually had a customer who wanted VAT on invoices calculated per product, which was completely irrelevant, instead of over the complete invoice.
The problem is, you're going to round VAT to two decimals, because no one ever pays €0.001.
So by adding up all the VATs for each product we got rounding errors (and those rounding errors added up!).
If you calculated the VAT over the entire invoice (like EVERYBODY in that business does) it wouldn't add up.
But for some reason they really wanted to have the VAT per product.
We went as far as to round to 16 decimal places, but we still ended up with rounding errors
Ultimately, we actually went for "as correct as possible with x decimal places."
In this case "correct" was of course VAT over the entire invoice because that was the only legal kind of VAT
|
|
|
|
|
Those little bits can add up
Here if a product is marked as 4.99 you'll pay 4.95 at the till / cashier, due to us no longer having 2c coins. AFAIK the rounding is only done on the total, but if you wanted to save a few cents you could pay for each product individually.
|
|
|
|
|
Not around here as mathematically correct rounding is applied here. 4,99 and 4,98 will result in 5,00. 4,96 and 4,97 will become 4,95. Unless you pay with your debet/credit card then it remains whatever it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Over here, in a store (for example, supermarket), VAT is included in the product price.
So 500 gr. (pre-packaged) grapes costs €2.19 incl. VAT.
If you buy two packs, you pay €4.38.
If you pay cash everything is rounded to 5 cents, so €4.38 would become €4.40, but €4.37 would be €4.35.
I can't remember the last time I paid cash at a store
This particular company sold meat (wholesale), so a customer would order five ribs, but they would pay per kg.
The customer gets an estimated price, based on what my customer sent them, then that customer would weigh everything again, and that weight was invoiced.
Naturally, you don't know the VAT until the actual invoice.
And since the VAT isn't included in the individual prices, like in a supermarket, you really can't do anything other than calculate VAT over the entire invoice
It's how I invoice too, and pretty much every business in the Netherlands.
|
|
|
|
|
If we didn't have the 1c piece (penny) here in the US, not too many cashiers would be able to round it correctly to the nearest 5c. It goes to show that we should better fund our education system. Because it is biting us in the rear.
|
|
|
|
|
At least in the UK, it's perfectly fine to do it either way:
17.5 Calculation of VAT on invoices - rounding of amounts[^]
Calculating per line makes it easier to deal with invoices where different products attract different VAT rates.
And if you calculate and round per line, you sometimes end up paying slightly less VAT.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|