|
Ian Shlasko wrote: Why would they want your dental records? Literary license, methinks.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
But that's not nearly as funny
|
|
|
|
|
How many gold fillings do you have?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it to get an idea of how wealthy your dentist has become at your expense?
I may not last forever but the mess I leave behind certainly will.
|
|
|
|
|
Dental records? Really?
Sounds odd to me.
|
|
|
|
|
A UK thing maybe?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I think that may have been him lapsing into ironic exaggeration to hammer home his point of excessive identification requirements.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't there be a lot of people in the UK who don't have dental records? I may be confused about that.
BDF
The internet makes dumb people dumber and clever people cleverer.
-- PaulowniaK
|
|
|
|
|
Big Daddy Farang wrote: Wouldn't there be a lot of people in the UK who don't have dental records? Just because they don't have teeth doesn't mean they don't have dental records.
Perhaps in the UK you carry them with you.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps, but I think it's more like what chriselst (aka Captain Obvious) suggested.
BDF
The internet makes dumb people dumber and clever people cleverer.
-- PaulowniaK
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this whole thread is tongue-in-cheek.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be aided by the whole lack of teeth thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Carry them? teeth or dental records?
Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
They don't have any dental records for the same reason they don't have any teeth. They've never seen the inside of a dentists office.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I am aware, Our parent company request photo drivers licence or Passport for new applicants so that thay can be certain that you are legally allowed to work in the UK.
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
I've got the line "I'm legally allowed to work in the Netherlands" in my resume. Still, if that is the issue, then that is what should be asked.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like they want to ensure you're legally able to work in the client's jurisdiction, which seems par for the course.
The same thing happens in the US/Canada, although the check is a simple question (to which you have to answer truthfully). However, physical proof is required before the offer of employment is sealed. In most companies, the employee/contractor onboarding process also requires that you agree that a background check will be done on you, and the employment agreement may be terminated based on the result of the check. Many employers will also refuse to hire you if you've ever been convicted of a felony.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
No, there is no reason why they should have that information. I had exactly that issue with an agent a few years back who promised me an interview within two days, and then started insisting they needed all sorts of irrelevant information. The interview (I don't believe there ever was one) disappeared into thin air very quickly. My last email to her told her in no uncertain terms that I did not like being lied to - never heard from them again.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, that what I'm afraid of...I did have the conversation that went "we are sending your details today, but you need to get us the info" it just that it sounds too good a job and the data they want is sufficient for ID theft...
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I had exactly that issue with an agent ... never heard from them again .
Why do I think you're lying now?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Why do I think you're lying now? Sorry?
|
|
|
|
|
I used to get asked for ridiculous things and always replied that should an offer be forthcoming that I was willing to accept then I would be happy to supply whatever they need (although I would have stopped short at dental or any type of medical records).
Never give them anything up front and never agree to have your cv/resume sent to an unknown employer - if they can't tell you who it is then it isn't a real job.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruiters tend to be aggressive at getting early commitments (I usually give them outrageous salaries) I suspect the reason for asking for proof you are able to work is the number of candidates they have who are either not legally able to work or, in the US, have a sponsorship that perspective employers may not want to bother with.
However, passport, birth certificate and medical records is absurd. For those, the answer is "go to hell."
|
|
|
|
|
A few years back when AT&T was hiring in the USA, their recruiters insisted that applicants provide a taxpayer ID as part of the application process (eg. before they've even seen your resume). Rumor was they had a list of previously laid-off ex-employees that they did not want hired back.
|
|
|
|