|
I still remember my first boss. He thought, by just renaming the function name, the program will start giving desired result. For example, by renaming the function "SaveToDisk()" to "SaveToDatabase()", the program will start saving data in database. Sometimes he took our class -- "Programming is nothing but Instruction to computer about what to do". But he did not know that computer understand the instruction in a particular language, not in English.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
Well who calls the Prime Minister in to fix a bug? Contributory negligence!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
True. Politicians only create problems; they never fix them.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with politicians is that they are generally lawyers. Always thought maybe we should require a politician to have a PhD in history. Maybe then we would not continue to make the same stupid mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
Good God. Have you ever talked to someone who had a PhD in history? Their goal in life is to achieve fame in their field by revising current historical thinking to mean something else. Instead of learning the lessons of history, they rewrite history to give the lessons they prefer.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
There have been plenty of politicians who were students of History. I don't recall that any of them were better at avoiding errors than the ignoramuses.
Very few (if any) politicians were trained in the "hard sciences" or as engineers. If this were a requirement, we would at least be certain that they can think logically in one field...
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
As I post this, the link is broken. Reminds me of git.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't one of the benefits of signing that you can have an entire conversation about a person right in front of them without them knowing what you're saying?
The whole thing's rigged to blow, touch those tanks and "boooom"!
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That could be great till you get the sign wrong, just like a Children's programme Hi kids 'I'm f****** you' | Metro News[^]
It is safe for work.
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Well yes and no. ASL is not simply a transliteration of English though. It also has it's own syntax and grammatical quirks which means that for anything other than a very simple 'sentence' or one specifically designed to avoid pitfalls you're not going to get anything a lot better than a Google translation of a Google translation. And we know how those work out ...
Quote:
Two students invented the American Sign Language Spoken English translation for gloves !
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's brilliant. I stayed on to listen to the Adele - a considerable improvement on the original. I think I'm in love!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
So, what do they say while doing a prostate exam?
|
|
|
|
|
The line that was repeated in the movie The Crow, right after the pawn-shop dealer shot our hero, I suspect.
NSFW --> The Crow[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Why did no-one think of this before? Of the thousands of ideas out there for helping the deaf to communicate effectively with the hearing, this has to be the most obvious and useful.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
you would notice that:
- everything is touch screen and mouse is a history to them
- Windows is hard for them to use
- No need to type, just use google voice recognition to search for what they want
- damaged TV - since they are so used to touch screen, and would just use the remote control to hit the TV screen when they found that it's not responsive to touch
|
|
|
|
|
I have kids..jpg wrote: - Windows is hard for them to use Nope. Mine find it easy enough..jpg wrote: No need to type, just use google voice recognition to search for what they want Err no - they almost never use voice input..jpg wrote: damaged TV - since they are so used to touch screen, and would just use the remote control to hit the TV screen when they found that it's not responsive to touch Again, no. They (and most of their friends judging by the way my house is taken over when they come over) have no problems with remote controls.
That's the problem with lists like this. They make great little "soundbites" but they really don't stand up to too much scrutiny.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have children, but I don't believe any of them are true either.
But somebody seemed to like it, because somebody upvoted it...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I totally believed the post until you posted your reply. Thanks for debunking it.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome. Saves you having to go and do a Madonna
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Saves you having to go and do a Madonna Good thing, I don't think he would have looked good in a cone bra either...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous
- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944
- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder how old (or young!) the OP's kids are. I expect his observations are skewed by their age.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I have kids and what I've found is that when asked who your "favourite child" is, you're expected to pick from one of your own.
|
|
|
|