|
Spammers all over the world must be busy stuffing their gut today. More than 80% of my daily emails are spam. That ratio has dropped to nearly zero today! 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Hadn't really noticed it until you said something, I haven't got near the disposable email today either.
Of course now that you've said something the flood gates will open?
|
|
|
|
|
Heh. Very likely will.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
...and we have have to hunt you down and call Ravi.Dispose("Horribly") as a punishment. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, I'm already 'orribly disposed as we speak. 'Tis a pleasant -8C in the neighborhood and workplace heating/cooling systems being what they are, my cube is freezing while the other half the floor is toasty warm. The irony is, I rarely feel cold.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Don't let Nagy know you have an Ice Cubical - he'll be looking for an enormous slice of lemon and a huge glass of Gin. 
|
|
|
|
|
Which would lead us to think most spammers are... american!
Why can't an ISP detect if 1 IP address sends out 1000s of messages in a tight time span and close the IP down!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be happy if people were charged 0.1¢ for every email they sent. I think that would help reduce spam, network load and power consumption.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
The official video game for the Ashes cricket tour has been pulled from sale after gamers branded it "shameful", "embarrassing" and "farcical".
Totally ridiculous, you could even have England win. 
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Nigella loves coke![^]
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
A quick change of subject!
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
|
And she also talks dirty![^]
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
hang on - didn't you lot beat the convicts a few months ago?
B
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
Letting them beat us was the only way we could get them to come down so we could give them a proper thrashing.
|
|
|
|
|
Muzak[^] is a registered trademark. And there was me thinking it was a just an offensive name for Sean's Playlist.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why? There must be at least a dozen media players almost identical to WinAmp, some of them open source, and some with the source code available.
WinAmp doesn't do anything that many others don't do.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of people who are resistant to change in any form.
Herself is the same: even if it is demonstrably better, she will stick with what she knows (until it has an unfortunate "accident" that is...)
|
|
|
|
|
Don't tell me she's one the people still using AOL Explorer[^]? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
No, I have better control of her computer than that!
|
|
|
|
|
You only think that because she lets you think it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: she will stick with what she knows
So she can stick with WinAmp; it ain't broken, it just won't change -- which appears to be what everyone wants, anyway.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: So she can stick with WinAmp; it ain't broken, it just won't change
It isn't broken now. Which isn't to say it won't be broken on windows 12.
|
|
|
|
|
My reasons why I don't want to switch:
1. I've been using it for about 15 years
2. It doesn't use massive amounts of cpu or ram even with lots of songs (Last time I tried iTunes couldn't even start anymore)
3. It doesn't fill your pc with bloatware
4. there are thousands of skins and customizations available
I've never had any problems whatsoever with winamp. No sound file it could *not* play. No crashes. It just worked. Even on slow hardware.
Why should all those winamp users be forced to go on a search for a player that offers the same features and the same feeling when they were perfectly fine with those offered by winamp?
Should I check out player x only to find out it offers feature a & b but not feature c? or player y that offers feature b & c but not feature a?
For me it's like switching from Windows to Linux. Sure I COULD probably do everything there too, but tell me: Why are people still buying Windows if they can get Linux Distributions for free?
modified 28-Nov-13 10:12am.
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: I've never had any problems whatsoever with winamp. No sound file it could play. No crashes.
Um.
That sounds like a problem to me!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
