|
If you have an account, it certainly does. There's a History menu option under "you" on the left on the web page. On my Roku the History option is under "library" which seems a bit odd to me.
If you don't have an account, do you delete cookies when you close your browser, regularly clean your browser history, or otherwise clean up locally stored web browsing data? Any of those might account why YouTube doesn't remember what you've seen.
"A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants"
Chuckles the clown
|
|
|
|
|
When I view the YT home tab, the images presented will have a thin red line along the bottom. If I started watching a video and then did not complete it, the red line will be an indication of how far into the video I was. If I completed the video it will be across the whole bottom of the displayed image. Don't know if it does this if you do a search though. This is on the general home tab that displays what it thinks you want to watch.
|
|
|
|
|
If your goal is so you don't sit through the same videos again, remember that as far as YouTube is concerned, the only thing that matters is that they make you watch their ads.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Can anyone think of a good reason that YouTube does not tell you which videos you've already watched
It does. Click on the three horizontal lines (menu icon) on the top left corner to open the sidebar and select History from the sidebar menu to view the list of watched videos in reverse chrono order. You can also clear your history.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I didn't know that.
But on the page where you actually watch a video, it shows the suggested videos on the right-hand side. And that is where I want to see whether I've watched a video or not.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing the suggested videos would be limited to those you haven't already seen (i.e. those whose IDs aren't in the YouTube cookie or local storage).
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Sung to "Video killed the radio star". Just to put that in your head for the rest of the day 
With the rise of AI, it seems to me that many search results are now AI generated answers on websites following recipes designed to garner ad hits. Many with the same exact wording and same tables of contents. With some questions, it's tough to locate a real website that has factual answers. It certainly varies with the question or topic, but it feels like it is on the increase. Had some where those make up the top handful of sites.
So, will these become a battle of AI, with search engines AI removing or deprioritizing those or maybe the sites will up their own AI game to get around the SE algorithms?
Strikes me as ironic, we'll see whose AI is better than whose. And if you don't have the song in your head, here it is for you The Buggles - Video Killed The Radio Star (Official Music Video) - YouTube[^]
|
|
|
|
|
This seems to be the trend on Microsoft. It started with generic canned responses (maybe a backdoor prototype AI) that I always felt were off and general useless. Now when I am looking for technical info, it smells like Microsoft's AI. I suppose it's the next evolution of search engines.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
MikeCO10 wrote: ...many search results are now AI generated answers on websites following recipes designed to garner ad hits...
Isn't that the same recipe Google has been using for years?
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
It is, but the results are often AI generated junk, maxing out the SEO rules.
For example, If I ask how do I trim a tree (I didn't check it, just an example), there can be several of the top results that are AI copies, for lack of a better word.
Maybe that points to an issue with AI; it creates its own validity based on a consensus of responses. One could easily become a bogus authority by spending very little money buying junk domain names and reposting the same content several times. I'd almost bet if I created a bunch of sites, or more so pages in my existing domains maybe, stating that asteroid QX95-217 may hit the earth in six months, the search engines AI could create credibility. Especially so if the AI "farmers" post more sites with the same information.
Sure, it was doable before AI, but it wasn't so easy and there really wasn't a way to create validity based on consensus.
|
|
|
|
|
Tried to google but found both opinions !! The site turing.com does not has phone number but even phone number can be faked. I tried to see the address on google maps but the location does not has any sign for the building !!
I am looking to work remotely but I dont know if this company legit or not ?
|
|
|
|
|
It should be not bad if VT rating is correct:
VirusTotal[^]
|
|
|
|
|
They ask for ID so they want to get full name, address and phone. Is it possible to scam me from these information ?
|
|
|
|
|
The ID bit, yes.
These 'interview' scammers will totally have you hold your ID up so they can steal the ssn (or other special numbers for other countries) and use those for fraud. The common knowledge pieces of information don't really matter (name/address/phone). It's being able to pair the name and birthday with the bit of more secret information (ssn or w/e) that enables identity fraud.
If they don't ask you to do skills assessment and personality tests... Basically, if the interview seems like a pleasant conversation and not an arduous interrogation, it's probably a scam. Heh. /s
Edit: Just to be clear - I'm not talking specifically about turing.com - I have no idea.
|
|
|
|
|
For other countries what they can do with these information: name, address, ID number, birthday ?
|
|
|
|
|
Open a bank account in your name?
Start taking out loans that you end up paying?
Scammers know what they are doing - for example: Clarkson stung by fraud stunt | Scams | The Guardian[^] and Identity theft | ICO[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading the newspaper yesterday (yes the paper version) and saw a story about undergrads designing and building a small satellite that NASA will launch into orbit. I was thinking how awesome it would've been to be a part of something like that in my college days. Kudo's to the people involved. 
NASA to launch UChicago undergraduates’ satellite | Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering | The University of Chicago[^]
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Would have been great to be a part of something like that.
I believe NASA has lauched quite a few school projects... even one by high school students from India. Good on them to work with students everywhere
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
ChandraRam wrote: Good on them to work with students everywhere
100% agree.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I think it only costs about $3k/pound to put something on a Falcon 9.
I couldn't afford a very heavy satellite, but it's pretty interesting to google that and realize I almost definitely could get some little something up there. Barring all the stuff like they probably don't just let anyone chuck a bit onto a rocket to fling into space and there's almost definitely more bureaucracy to it than just paying.
Edit: The CodeProject Payload Project? That would rock. If y'all do it, I'd definitely want to try to be some part of it.
modified 2 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Bad news is it's a year and a half off, and the announcement was probably only made to shore up the Take Two Interactive after a loss of $2.9bn in the last financial quarter[^] ... so I'd say it's probably inaccurate - it'll slip back given how the long time frame implies there is a lot of work still to do.
Damn it! I was looking forward to that early next year. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Well Dragon age inquisition GOTY edition is free on epic this week. May help pass some of that wait time. 
|
|
|
|
|
I love DA, I think there are too many collection quests in DAI though (same fault as Mass Effect Andromeda).
I'm back in Fallout mode though, tossed in 120 hours this month between FO3 and FO4.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the headlines but didn't bother reading any of the details.
I'm assuming this is as per previous releases, where the console releases get preferential treatment, and the PC port only comes out a year or so later. Then add a few more months for the show-stopping bugs to get patched...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, ha! Yes! Do any of you remember my thread asking you guys
how fast you drive on sidewalks? 
**Yes, I have driven 63 mph on a sidewalk!
OK, back on topic. I think GTA is a great game!
I used to play Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas back in 2007.
I never actually learned how to play the game.
I still haven't a clue how to play it.
I had every cheat code memorized.
I spent most of my time shooting down police helicopters
by the dozens with an endless supply of rocket launchers.
Then, I discovered how to turn off gravity.
I would magically materialize a military tank out of thin air,
turn off gravity, get inside the tank, and repeatedly fire
the cannon. The recoil would accelerate the tank in reverse,
and once I got up to speed, I would take off into the air.
Sometimes, I'd land the tank on the road and, *GASP* veer off
the road and onto the sidewalk! 
DISCLAIMER: I'm sorry to all of you who are reading this.
It's not my intention to traumatize anyone by what I'm saying.
May God bless the many loved ones in your life who were lost
being hit by vehicles driving down sidewalks.
I can only imagine how amazing the newest versions of GTA are.
If you can still turn off gravity, materialize unlimited
military tanks out of thin air, and play the game as a
flight simulator, I want to play it! 
**That would have turned out to be a fun thread if it weren't for an unnamed social justice hero who derailed that thread with his preposterous act of virtue signaling. I apologize to all of you who read that thread. For those of you who have lost loved ones (many of you, I'm sure) from being hit by cars driving on sidewalks, it wasn't my intention to traumatize you or trigger you to have a PTSD episode. I've had a family member who was killed after being struck by a vehicle as a pedestrian. It's an awful thing, but I'm glad it didn't destroy my sense of humor.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
