|
Looks like you really need the coronavirus thing to be over, so you can go back to work.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Looks like you really need the coronavirus thing to be over, so you can go back to work.
I normally provide full service mockery from the office. The kitchen table doesn't change anything on that front.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I am a professional! I only mock people if paid for my services!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote:
I figured that there had to be a less boring and trite way of saying "Too much time on your hands?"
Pearls before swine, I tell ya! I'm wastin' my bloody time with all these "in-the-box" thinkers!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The legacy about page in Control Panel may finally be put to rest, if feature IDs are to be believed. No one needs to change the defaults, do they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: A modern Settings app, and a legacy settings app known as Control Panel
I contest that wording.
It should be: "A crappy, annoying, near-useless settings app that has to call Control Panel applets 70% of the time, and a usable settings app that doesn't know how to lay items out alphabetically".
Time to re-disable wupdate on the tablet, then. It was annoying me, anyway, because every time I turned the tablet on (it's hardly one of my most-used tools), it would force an update (usually to break more of the things I use), and I'd end up just letting it finish, then switch it off again.
At least now I might get to actually use it for a few minutes, before switching it off.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Article has since been updated to clarify that all they've found is indications that a few more tiny bits are going to be replicated and defaulted to settings in the future.
As for the original claim... Well they finally replaced the last vestiges of Win 3.1 settings a few years ago (something to do with managing fonts). That took about 25 years; which would suggest that fully Win8/10ing settings is on track to be finished around 2035. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: As for the original claim... Well they finally replaced the last vestiges of Win 3.1 settings a few years ago (something to do with managing fonts). That took about 25 years; which would suggest that fully Win8/10ing settings is on track to be finished around 2035.
Oh, it'll be done a lot sooner than that.
Two-thirds of it won't work properly, but it'll be done.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Two-thirds of it won't work properly,
Since when are you that optimist? I would say nine-tenths
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The latest version of the language development toolkit improves parallelism in Wasm and adds a sublanguage that aids machine learning Sorry, some things are beyond my ability to make funny and/or insightful
But feel free to provide something.
|
|
|
|
|
The days of big team consulting are over. Technology organizations are aligning their budgets to get projects done faster and more agilely. What your boss hears: "Small teams work. One is a small team, so must be best"
|
|
|
|
|
Given that, viewed from extensive past experience, a big team is essentially a small team with extra members who do little more than sow confusion and dissent, I find it hard to argue with the article.
Shame.
I'm in the mood for bitching about bad articles 
Sharkey, 6/10, must try harder
[edit]
I typed "sew", not "sow".
Wallace, 3/10, just forget it and go flip burgers
[/edit]
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
modified 26-Mar-20 3:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if some members don't sow confusion and dissent, the members of a big team get in each other's way. So if something is too big to be done by a small team, having an application framework that allows them to work fairly independently is important.
modified 26-Mar-20 12:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
TEAM in German = Toll Ein Anderer Macht's (translation: Nice, another guy will do it)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
So instead, we have a bunch of little teams on a big project that utterly fail to communicate.
Companies like SpaceX totally amaze me, as that has to be one heck of a big team, and they actually get rockets into space and OMG land the boosters back on earth.
[edit] And define "team" - are people in the supply chain part of the "team"? One could argue, yes. Is the customer part of the "team"? Again arguably yes. [/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: One is a small team, so must be best
Just don't show this study
Quote: Technology organizations are aligning their budgets to get projects done faster and more agilely
Isn't it what organisations are doing for the latest 2 decades?
But to be fair the idea of small teams really appeals to me. In a sense that each team has it's limited part of the scope. And such decomposition helps to reduce complexity.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link. Interesting article.
|
|
|
|
|
Bohdan Stupak wrote: But to be fair the idea of small teams really appeals to me. In a sense that each team has it's limited part of the scope. And such decomposition helps to reduce complexity.
It also prevents them from knowing that they're making a dastardly weapon for Dr. Evil.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Only unless the management of the company is excited to announce that it has an exclusive contract with Dr. Evil.
It might sound really dumb. But that happened to me in one of the companies I was working for. It was the 3rd year of Russian-inspired conflict in the east of the country. And the CEO had a meeting to announce that the company signed contract with Russian military corporation Kalashnikov (I bet you've heard of it). CEO wanted us to be as excited about it as she was but you could really feel frustration floating the room back then.
|
|
|
|
|
Only the Russians would give a military supplies contract to a company they'd started aggressive action against 
If I were in a planning session for it, the first thing I'd ask is "How can we make it blow up in their faces?"
I used to have great fun with one of the Ukrainian guys I worked with, because his wife is Russian, which gave me plenty of material to work with. He was also the one who led me to believe that the Ukrainian for "Russians" is "mother-%$#@%$# Russians", because that's the only way he ever said it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
C# 7.0 introduced the concept of discards. Discards are intentionally unused, temporarily dummy variables that we don’t care about and don’t want to use. A throwaway idea?
I will admit I never heard of these before. Shame on me. (They still look awful, and I suspect I'll never use them, but YMMV)
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I will admit I never heard of these before. Shame on me.
Don't worry... you are not alone in this one.
Something that just came to my mind:
"What is worst, ignorance or indifference? I don't know and I don't care"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
What the actual f*ck is the reason for declaring variables that are *intentionally* unused?
Any variables in my code that end up eventually being unused are *intentionally* deleted before I deliver the code.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
You took the words out of my mouth.
But the article gives an example of a function that updates multiple arguments. If you don't care about one of its results, you pass a "blank" value to that argument. This is interesting because it documents that the code doesn't care and potentially allows the compiler to generate code that would make the function more efficient in this situation.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
