|
Ah! So then just leave it off?
|
|
|
|
|
A while ago, I was studying the output of IntelliJ IDEA’s static analyzer for Java code and came across an interesting case. Sometimes the tool wins
|
|
|
|
|
So far, physicists have identified four fundamental forces of nature: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force.
But now, researchers have found new evidence for a fifth force of nature — and it could help us finally unravel the mystery of dark matter. Midichlorians?
Political opinions? (repulsive force)
Duct tape?
The force that causes there always to be a headwind when you're riding your bike?
|
|
|
|
|
It could be the pseudo higgs boson for a nearby superconducting strong interaction vacuum state I conjectured in the late 90th (see here[^], in could even has implications on dark energy problem, in case any one in interested to know 
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't realize that my mother-in-law spoke with any physicists.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers from Trustwave’s SpiderLabs discovered the spam emails, which come with an 'Install Latest Microsoft Windows Update now!' or 'Critical Microsoft Windows Update!’ subject line. Microsoft, of course, doesn’t send out Windows updates through email. It's bad enough we have to worry about the legitimate Windows updates
|
|
|
|
|
I thought Windows was hardened against this kind of crap.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
A new study of artificial intelligence suggests better-paid, better-educated workers might be more impacted by automation than previously thought. Then they came for me...
Oh, wait - "Market research analysts". Bring it on!
|
|
|
|
|
I continue thinking that we will be in the last group to get (if we get) replaced.
And I mean real developers / good professionals as the ones one can find here in CP.
Codemonkeys and sub-standard QA-Enquirers... those are another thing.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hilarious.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Just seen on Twitter[^]:
Most assuredly, in 10 years, AI will eliminate the job of coding in the very same way as did compilers the last 50 years. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
IT operations teams and security teams within a company don’t communicate as well as they could, which makes the entire organisation more vulnerable to cyber-threats than it should be. "Why can't we all just get along?"
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree... there are companies where they are not more vulnerable.
They are just so secure, that one can't do his job efficiently anymore 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: They are just so secure, that one can't do his job efficiently anymore
USAF...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
#realJSOP wrote: USAF...
If only...
I live in another country and don't work for government
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
That's my environment, though. The USAF has so much security absurdity in place that it's almost impossible to get anything done.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Big OEMs in Europe are getting pretty close to that definition
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
IBM, Microsoft and the Linux Foundation have partnered with the Open Invention Network (OIN), a company formed to protect Linux from patent threats, to take on "Patent Assertion Entities", also known as patent trolls. "Trolls are only counterfeits, made by the Enemy in the Great Darkness"
Because I just can't bring myself to using that Ballmer quote AGain.
|
|
|
|
|
So they are going to be a big "DNFTT"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
On the one hand, there’s an understandable desire to standardize — a set of approved languages can help reign in maintenance costs and long-term viability. But equally, many of us recognize the benefits of using whichever language the developer feels allows them to express themselves most eloquently. 42?
Or rather I guess 43 as 42 is the right number?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: whichever language the developer feels allows them to express themselves most eloquently.
Kind of mandatory[^]
or...
Kind of mandatory too[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: many of us recognize the benefits of using whichever language the developer feels allows them to express themselves most eloquently
I don't!
I have seen time after time developers introduce frameworks and languages that they like and then impose on others with huge change and cost by re-writing perfectly maintainable systems because it was not in their currently favourite language.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
There's no such thing as "too many languages".
Pretty much EVERY language ever developed fills a specific perceived need. When you get right down to it, it all results in binary code. You're pretty much restricted to using the language(s) required to do the job. Period. End of discussion.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Google wants less forking, more modularization for Android's Linux kernel. We want a standard kernel, instead of the standard kernel?
and now someone can post the "And now you have 15 standards" xkcd for me please?
"The Linux community has been against the idea of a stable interface for some time" <- explains so much about Linux
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: and now someone can post the "And now you have 15 standards" xkcd for me please?
You are welcome: The Insider News[^]
Just want to avoid the Leslie  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
