|
NY Times: [^]Quote: SAN FRANCISCO — Google on Monday fired a software engineer who wrote an internal memo that questioned the company’s diversity efforts and argued that the low number of women in technical positions was a result of biological differences instead of discrimination.
More coverage on Motherboard including complete memo: [^]
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it. A few hundred years later another traveler despairing as myself, may mourn the disappearance of what I may have seen, but failed to see.» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
Here's another view from Forbes. Linking to the google search version because the original is "timing out"  forbes googles-diversity-rumpus-the-fun-thing-is-hes-right-about-the-cause-of-the-gender-disparity - Google Search[^] Note: click the downarrow next to the first link to get the cached version.
//Edit// Seems Tim Worstall has removed the article from his archive. Interesting. Was probably getting death threats.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
modified 8-Aug-17 14:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't read his memo, but I can understand his perceived frustration.
At a former job, there was a government requirement that large companies have an ethnic make up and gender mix in the company that matched the community they were in.
Every employee was required to fill out a survey identifying their ethnic background and gender; a fellow employee, an ethnic minority female, decided that her people had been slighted so, identified herself as a Caucasian male to skew the results.
The requirement had NOTHING to do with having the best people for the job: it was simply forcing quotas on employment and management levels based on a survey that wasn't verified.
Yes, I could have lied about my ethnic background and gender... how about honesty and hiring the best people for the job?
|
|
|
|
|
Worked for a large company when I was still going through college and they had a similar requirement.
The site I was at kept getting reprimanded because we weren't hitting the proper percentages. This was because we weren't getting said applicants and can't hire people who don't apply. Turned over all the applications for the past several years, indicated that every applicant that met criteria was hired, and so on.
Huge pain in the backside plus a massive waste of time and resources.
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever the government gets involved things get worse - always. But I digress and I'll save that conversation for the soapbox. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
When my younger brother was about 3, he had an infection in his throat. My parents rushed him to the hospital because he was having trouble breathing.
From my mother, Dr. Brown - a black doctor - ran down the hall rolling up his shirt sleeves and straight into surgery where he performed an emergency tracheotomy. He was more concerned about saving a life than taking time to scrub in... and probably saved my brother's life in the process. Skin color or ethnic background does not make anyone the best person for the job - their ability to DO the job is what matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Carmichael wrote: Skin color or ethnic background does not make anyone the best person for the job
Exactly my point...
Except prejudice and bigotry say otherwise.
That's why there are quotas. I'm not saying I agree with quotas, but I'm not saying they are evil either.
|
|
|
|
|
Spot on - the thing is people complaining about "positive discrimination" are failing to address the fact that there is already existing discrimination. Hopefully, over time, both will dwindle to nothing.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh don't get me started on this. I realize freedom of speech applies moreso to the government. But even outside of that, humanity will never advance if we always censor those who don't agree with us.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
"Freedom of speech" by design must protect unpopular speech.
|
|
|
|
|
private employers are not the government. (yet)
|
|
|
|
|
When they are regulated up-the-wazoo, then one could argue they are the gov't.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
one would lose that argument
|
|
|
|
|
maybe, but it wouldn't be because it wasn't true.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
no, it would be because you can't just change the meaning of words to suit your political agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
The courts have ruled that if I act on behest of the police (a part of the gov't) then I in fact, even though a private citizen, become a defacto government agent. Taking this to the present case then, if a company is acting a certain way due to requirements of law and regulation and "consent decrees" they in fact become government agents. Just my feeble logic here.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
a private company is not the government. full stop.
|
|
|
|
|
it is when it is acting at the behest of and as an agent of the gov't.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PTB beg to differ
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agree.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
This guy was not arrested so his freedom of speech was not compromised or infringed upon in the slightest. He is now suffering from the consequences of his actions but in the USA we do NOT have the right of freedom from consequences.
Yet. 
modified 8-Aug-17 18:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I would argue that the only "consequence" for unwanted, undesirable speech should be more speech directed at the speaker of undesired speech, not loosing one's livelyhood.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Businesses have the freedom to employ whom they choose to (within the constraints of immigration law) and I do not think that should be reduced in any way.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
