|
Open Source C# to JavaScript Compiler and Frameworks.
Run Your App On Any Device Using JavaScript. Halve your performance in no time flat!
|
|
|
|
|
 you pretty much always crack me up wit your one liners.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
You are too kind. Thank you.
Now awaiting someone telling me I'm not funny. Due any second now to harsh my vibe. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
You're not funny.
No need to thank me 
|
|
|
|
|
Aaaaaah, I feel so much better (and symmetrical) now. Thank you 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
It's the least I could do for such a funny guy like yourself
|
|
|
|
|
They show a very contrived example. It is C# written in a very JavaScript style ready to convert. Plus it doesn't convert to standard JS but their own version.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Tried threading. No joy. 
|
|
|
|
|
I've got to say, "Thank the FSM!" Can you imagine what the JS would have ended up looking like? You might have opened a portal to a dark dimension. 
Oh wait, that's how JS was created in the first place.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I actually performed the ritual goat sacrifice, entered the threading code and awaited coming of the Cthulhu and... Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. My overlord won't be pleased.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: JS was created
By Gosling reconstituting his own diarhea.
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if they ever heard of Script#...and if checked why that project wasn't a great success...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you have to learn their library and C#/JS mishmash to make it work.
Decrease the belief in God, and you increase the numbers of those who wish to play at being God by being “society’s supervisors,” who deny the existence of divine standards, but are very serious about imposing their own standards on society.-Neal A. Maxwell
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
“We can’t go on like this. We need to rewrite this thing from scratch.” Yet another view on the issue (that's pretty much the same as the other sane views)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chalk one up for laziness. Yes!
My hero would be proud and it just so happens he is highlighted in today's news...err...Dilbert:
http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-10-19[^]
Edit:
Also, thanks for that link to the Spolsky article. That's a great read.
modified 19-Oct-15 21:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm... shortly after starting my career, I was involved in 3 software rewrites.
The first two were entire system rewrites moving from a PDP-11 to a MicroVAX and took the better part of a year for each one with dedicated teams. The first one was a ROUGH, very ROUGH implementation due to not being able to fully test everything in a 'production' environment.
The second one was in place for a week when management asked when it was going in - lessons learned from the first rewrite were successfully applied.
The third rewrite was a single graphical application that had two like parts that drifted apart over time. I convinced management to let me write the application is pseudo code and then rewrite it. That was another successful implementation.
Lessons learned: take the time to fully test and ensure all teams members are aware of the environment; don't assume they have seen it before.
|
|
|
|
|
In an effort to acquire more Google Apps for Work customers, Google just announced a new promotion that’s a huge shot across Microsoft’s bow. Free tools available for free. News as it comes in.
|
|
|
|
|
Security firm CrowdStrike says attackers try to breach tech, pharma companies. "Promises and pie crusts are made to be broken."
|
|
|
|
|
when are they going to be more relaxed than after such a deal?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Breaking the rules can bring a little thrill -- and produce better, more efficient code. Bonus #0: Listicles (OK, maybe that's just me)
|
|
|
|
|
"Too much code on a line" and "Short variable names" are something I like to do and it makes me feel good in a bad way!
I tend to leave HTML and ASP.Net web controls on the same line rather than putting them on separate lines because of the old Netscape 6.2/IE problems. Back then IE and Netscape displayed HTML so differently, I removed a lot excess white space to deter UI defects.
I try not to declare many variables in C# or JavaScript; so that is not a problem for me. But I do create a lot of classes and ids in CSS which get ugly; such as: .pr25{margin-right: 25px;} or .len10{width: 80px;}, or even .mb5{margin-bottom: 5px;}.
|
|
|
|
|
I used goto once in the application that generates keys for door locks. There are 7 rules to generate key codes and evaluation logic at each step to make sure code that is being generated does not violate rules like no three adjutant cut can be identical and need to have certain relationship to master key and grand master keys and such. At any point if condition fail it needs to reset all the digits from position where it failed the rule and start from rule 1 again. I saw goto as a perfect fit.
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
1. I can't even remember when last time I did it
2. What 'documentation' is?
3. Never more than the screen wide...
4. How that can be a bad habit in languages with no types?
5. Yo-yo-yo-yo-yo-yo-yo
6. I use ONLY my own there...
7. "People with ropes around their necks don't always hang."
8. Bad?
9. I wondering what programming experience the author have...
Where all the 'eat/drink on top of the keyboard' things gone?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Programming habit No. 7a: Not breaking out of loops in the middle
More code means more bugs. I recently refactored a big, ugly method into about 12 lines of code. It had two loops and I had a return on the first and a break on the second. Lead got upset and made me put in control variables. The method not only went up to about 20 lines of code, it became so convoluted that I disavowed all knowledge of it. But my lead was happy.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
