|
The software is codenamed Project VoCo, and it’s not clear at this time when it will materialize as a commercial product. The standout feature, however, is the ability to add words not originally found in the audio file. Oh, that's never going to be used for the wrong purposes
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Oh, that's never going to be used for the wrong purposes boring. Who wants me to give them some money?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see the big deal. Our mainstream media already does that. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Can it be used for REMOVING words from the recording without trace?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
With its new Microsoft Teams offering, the Redmond giant has built a new chat-based workspace in Office 365 which brings together thread-based conversations, integrations with Office apps and extensibility features through support for third-party apps. "Everybody's talking at me. I don't hear a word they're saying"
|
|
|
|
|
What an absolute waste of bleeding time.
The only plus I can see is that it will keep low-quality managers, HR, and marketing morons occupied, and out of profit-makers' hair.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: What an absolute waste of bleeding time.
Why? Do you ever work on a team that is not all in one location?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
ITYM "Do you never work on teams where the members are not ~~"
I create processes whereby remote team members can contribute.
I lay down the rules that make it possible for people to work from home for up to three days a week.
None of what I do centres around ridiculous, outdated, chatty toys -- a behaviour that ms is now heralding as a great advancement.
Remote team members don't need to chat, they need to contribute; they need access to far more powerful tools than a messenger with 900 emojis and "interactive communication" cr@p -- and they need to be able to use those tools in ways that are secure, painless, and productive.
As always seems to be the case, since Gates handed over the reins, the world has long moved on from the point they're starting at.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Remote team members don't need to chat
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly the kind of reaction I expected from you, Mothly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Exactly the kind of reaction I expected from you
What else can you say to someone who is so clueless, arrogant, and closed-minded at the same time? No point in even trying to have a discussion.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup.
First, deflection, by focussing on a single point (whilst ignoring all others) and responding to it without actually saying anything.
Second: Resorting to invective.
Next, you'll be saying something to try to convince people, whom you (and only you) believe are watching, what a sincere and nice chap you are.
Right out of the trolls' handbook.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: by focussing on a single point (whilst ignoring all others)
I had no idea you wanted me to proof your entire message. I took exception with something you said, called you out on it to discuss. Sorry I hurt your feelings. Not my intention. But this is clearly beyond something you can discuss. Good day.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, just as predicted. Pompous "I'm a stout fellow!" cr@p.
Textbook trolling, as always.
You should try reading a different book -- the Bible, maybe, as one of your trolling tools is to claim that you're a Christian.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Boy is he sensitive. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
He sure is. Simple conversations are too much for him.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Zo, herr RyanDev. How long have you felt ze need to talk to yourself, eh? 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Forogar wrote: How long have you felt ze need to talk to yourself, eh?
Whenever it elevates the conversation. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Algorithms usually need thousands of examples to learn something. Researchers at Google DeepMind found a way around that. "Do you see yonder cloud that’s almost in shape of a camel?"
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! They've invented something new!
What should we call it?
Oh! I know!
Let's call it "fuzzy logic", "genetic algorithms", and "backpropagation"!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
How about "artificial stupidity"?
|
|
|
|
|
No, that's not yet possible: human stupidity is without any limits, hence getting close to it artificially will still take some time. 
|
|
|
|
|
You've got a good point here, mate! 
|
|
|
|
|
The White House today is announcing the launch of Code.gov, a website that shows off U.S. government open-source projects and offers relevant resources for government agencies. I thought the website for that was wikileaks.org?
|
|
|
|
|
We'll make our code open-source, just like our Secretary of State did with national confidential material via an unsecure open email server.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
