|
That's a pretty cr*ppy thing to say!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey if it looks like poo and it smells like poo chances are it ain't an iPhone and if it is it ain't worth saving.
Moral is; Don't poo and text!
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: open-pit toilet
Wow! I saw such a thing like 40 years ago, but no cell phones then... I believe I can build a modern toilet for less then $320 - not for saving phones but for saving idiots...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: I believe I can build a modern [makeshift] toilet for less then $320
Isn't that more accurate? Basic septic tanks appear to be more than $700, and if you don't have the infrastructure of a sewage line isn't that about the only alternative? Adding the toilet, digging, and lines takes you closer to $1000 if you work cheap cheap cheap, i.e., something like this[^] (which won't meet any codes.)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, for many people smartphones are much more important than basic useful infrastructure.
If you want to get an idea of infinity, do not look at distant stars in the sky, look down at human stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
sh*t happens!!!
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Meet 0xDBE, a new IDE from JetBrains tailored to suit the specific needs of professional DBAs and developers. All those IntelliJ goodies, now in SQL flavour
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link I believe I'll try it!
If first you don't succeed, hide all evidence you ever tried!
|
|
|
|
|
The first production-ready version of the open source Linux container engine irons out networking and other wrinkles. Containers are the new VMs. Or something like that.
|
|
|
|
|
After the first 3 paragraphs, I still have no idea WTH it is.
After the fourth... I...still don't really.
|
|
|
|
|
That pretty much describes my reaction to every article I've read on Docker. Still, some people seem really keen on it.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
By the 5th paragraph I've got a reasonably clear idea what it's supposed to do and am wondering how it compares to a tool called Vagrant[^] that I used once and which appears to do similar things.
OTOH Mike's reaction more or less sums up my reaction to every article I've read on infoworld; with the exception that most don't get better as you keep reading.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
They do seem to be the same, but Vagrant has the advantage of being cross-platform without a VM, unlike Docker, which requires Linux.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
a Docker container allows you to move applications and services seamlessly between host servers.
Given how many "sudo apt-get install [fizbin]" commands I have to issue to install just the basic set of tools I'm using in Ubuntu, I really really really have a hard time believing applications (and their thousands of dependencies) can move "seemlessly" between host servers. Unless part of the magic is to synchronize the servers so that they are essentially mirrors of each other.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I was in the same boat of confusion.
Actually if you go to the Docker main site: http://www.docker.com/[^] it quickly shows you what it is. And it is quite amazing.
|
|
|
|
|
Two years ago we launched GitHub for Windows as the easiest way to use Git and GitHub on Windows. Today we're shipping a major update that helps you focus more on your work and gives you a more streamlined way of getting that work to and from GitHub. Now with more Gitty goodness
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Now with more Gitty goodness
I'm still baffled by how what seems like really simple concepts can be made so freaking complicated.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I always thought it was the old, "You know it's working because it hurts" model of software design.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
It's like why Linus insists on using C instead of C++[^] (contains profanity) for the kernel. To keep the riffraff out.
Linus Ranted: C++ is a horrible language. It's made more horrible by the fact that a lot
of substandard programmers use it, to the point where it's much much
easier to generate total and utter crap with it. Quite frankly, even if
the choice of C were to do *nothing* but keep the C++ programmers out,
that in itself would be a huge reason to use C. (emphasis mine)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I can only imagine what would happen if he considered VisualBasic. [nyuk, nyuk, nyuk] Hey, Moe! Hey Moe!* Total & utter paroxysm.
OKay, I admit it, I just posted this so I could use the word paroxysm. It's absolutely paroxysmal of me.
*ala Three Stooges --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_stooges[^]
Plus, I really wanted to mention the Three Stooges. But seriously, Linus and VisualBasic don't belong together.
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, Github for my old Windows 2.0[^] machine.
I'm never upgrading!
|
|
|
|
|
I also read it that way at first. I thought, do I need to unpack my 286 now?
|
|
|
|
|
Followup - what an utter piece of crap. It appears there is no way to connect to an existing repository already cloned on my box.
Did it not occur to the designers that someone may want to do that???
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
@MarcClifton
What do you mean? Surely if it's cloned on your box it's already connected to the remote repo?
|
|
|
|
|
HomerTheGreat wrote: Surely if it's cloned on your box it's already connected to the remote repo?
Of course it is, but there's now way for me to tell the GitHub Windows app that there's a folder with an already cloned repository!
Or am I missing something? Does this thing do anything more than create/clone repositories? I thought it let you do things like commits, merges, branches, etc.
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
