|
I only fear the type of answer we can get back
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I only fear the type of answer we can get back
Like:
Is this an "all you can eat" buffet?
Do you have a "kids menu"?
Do I need to make a reservation?
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
What other civilizations?
And how much money do you want to waste on something we're already doing?
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Apple has stepped up its efforts to hit its two biggest rivals — Microsoft and Google — where it hurts. Because iWork is so compelling
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Google: what happened? "Being against evil doesn't make you good."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Being Stating that you are against evil doesn't make you good."
Also remember that a company can be the best without being good.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Also remember that a company can be the best without being good.
I sure wish some students were reminded of this point more often.
|
|
|
|
|
Exception Filters are a new feature in C# 6 which allows you to specify conditions along with a catch block. The catch block is only executed if the condition satisfies. catch(Exception ex) if (ex.Source="C#" && ex.Message.Contains("v.Next"))
|
|
|
|
|
Yaaaawn... We've had this for years in VB.NET! About time C# caught up! 
That's right VB haters! Better show some respect!
For the record, I love C#, but VB.NET was my first love and I kind of have a weakness for it...
And VB.NET doesn't deserve the hate it's getting (ok, some of it)
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
I notice your signature contains C# code, not VB.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean? That's VB alright! 
Your brain must've blocked out the VB and translated it to C#!
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're right, it's actually F# 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
That's not F# either. 
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Assembler?
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Keep guessing. When you get to C#, stop.
|
|
|
|
|
You really want me to continue? 
To tell you the truth I actually know what language I wrote my own signature in. I'm just messing with you guys
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Dude, with the tpye and quality of a lot of the questions that show up around here, I wouldn't doubt someone doesn't have a clue about what they put in their signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I sure hope you hold me in a little higher esteem  ... Right? 
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Psshhhhht. Yeah, right.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a question, but I didn't want to sign-up at the site to ask it. I suppose this is a programming question, so I won't delve into it other than point out a flaw in the article.
In the example he specifies a use case of logging without unwinding the stack. The premise sounds good except that at the point he logs he has no context for the exception. The most he can log is that there was an exception and maybe pass in some state information on a method overload. The exception object hasn't been created yet.
I could be missing something. His original does the same thing -- there is no context to the exception.
|
|
|
|
|
The exception object has been created - it's just that the examples on that blog post don't show it. You could easily do:
try
{
...
}
catch (SomeException ex) if (Log(ex))
{
}
This blog post[^] has a better example.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm...wrong.
If the Exception hasn't been created yet, how is the catch block going to know about it?
The Exception HAS been created by the time the catch block and the filters start executing.
Ever set a breakpoint on a catch in VS? Without the catch executing, you get a little tag you can click and see the, wait for it, Exception object!
|
|
|
|
|
A 10-month study of four scanning tools by Damballa highlights some familiar weaknesses. "There is no security on this earth; there is only opportunity."
|
|
|
|
|
Eich believes JavaScript can be a 'virtual machine embedded everywhere that you can target code at' Write once, walk everywhere?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
