|
Absolutely correct. We are living in a world where phones are getting smarter and people are getting dumb
|
|
|
|
|
Smart.... ass?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Someone had to go first, so on March 15, 1985, Lisp computer maker Symbolics, Inc., registered the Internet’s first dot-com address: Symbolics.com. There you go: next time someone asks, "What was the first .com?" you'll be able to answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: next time someone asks, "What was the first .com?" you'll be able to answer.
That's actually pretty cool to know. Interesting website too.
Which I'd thought to register fb.com when Facebook first arrived on the scene.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Last week, I wrote a column on the deep fear held by many in the startup ecosystem of hiring a “Secretly Terrible Engineer.” The sequel
|
|
|
|
|
This is a tutorial on how to implement a programming language. Because... because... well, I guess because at least one person felt a need
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully, the language based on JavaScript would be better than JavaScript.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
The only way you could make JavaScript worse would be to add "indentation based block scoping".
I might just do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Implementing a programming language Hmmmmmm I only worried these days about mastering one
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers suggest there are so many scientific papers that their contents are being rapidly forgotten. "Recursion: see Recursion."
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know where you got it from - but I guess from my new signature?
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
It's an old joke, but then so am I.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I think I also already knew it once. I guess I'm so old it's new again
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
It recursed itself into re-relevance
|
|
|
|
|
nice one!
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, I can't remember the contents of this study, which means I must've remembered it!
And I certainly remember that study that said refactoring isn't effective
|
|
|
|
|
This would really appeal to the Neo-Luddites[^].
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Kent wrote: "Recursion: see Recursion."
I don't know how you picked it. But there is tech joke says
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Recursion: see Recursion."
In other words, this study added one more to that.
A question arises: Has the increased number of scientific studies decreased the 'unscientific-ness' of the general populace? I guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
Go offers speed, concurrence, and portability, but it's still young and might be too simple. Do not collect $200
|
|
|
|
|
Some guy on the web wrote: while many modern languages force programmers to front-load the design aspect of a program
Which is bull. It takes a certain restraint to not use features available, and opinions which features are "good old" vs. "a burden" may diverge in a team. Yet no one forces you to use lambdas or polymorphy or generics / templates or whatever irks you.
Simplicity is probably good when projects see high employee turnover.
Plus, "Google backing" can be a fickle beast.
The rest can probably be said about every young language.
|
|
|
|
|
Google Apps has leaked hidden names, phone numbers, and more since mid-2013. You'd think they'd be able to keep that off the search engines
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is planning to bring its Cortana digital assistant to iOS and Android as a standalone app. Siri vs. Cortana: The Squabble in the Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
One feature buried deep in the settings of the OS that paves the way for how future updates will be delivered to your machine has been uncovered. "I want your person to person. Bring your big fine foxy self on home!"
|
|
|
|
|