|
Take this man out and shoot him!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
...and in all that he still doesn't list which 19 programs were tested. He mentions a few of them but how are we to tell if our own favourite AV software has been tested by these people?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Financially-motivated hackers are using SS7 attacks to break into bank accounts. Well, back to telegrams. No one will hack those. STOP
|
|
|
|
|
I looked into this a while back, and actually changed banks because of it.
Now, to log in to my bank account, I have to put my PIN card into a little doohickey, enter my PIN code into the doohickey, and use its back camera to read a 256-colour QR block on the computer screen. The doohickey then calculates a code for me to enter into the web-page.
No personal information at all is transferred during the process, and it'd be a nightmare to crack, even with a man-in-the-middle attack.
So the tech is there, and it's cheap. Nag at your bank until they institute something similar.
Passwords != secure.
Two-factor authentication == asking for trouble.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's impressive. Which bank is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Rabobank[^]
It helps if you live in NL.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's not far away from the system my bank uses. I have to "put my card into a little doohickey" too, then it either reads some data from a flickering computer screen (which usually fails) or I enter manually long blocks of numbers into that little doohickey, and then it calculates a 4digit transaction number which I have to enter into their webpage. It was some 5 years ago when my bank changed to that system.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, even with the "added bonus" of typing the awkward blocks, you're still far safer with that. Good choice.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Up to $55,000 in prizes for those who can juice up supercomputer software. Replace it with JavaScript code? (That's what everyone else is doing, *must* be for performance, right?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, you've got until 29th June, so it should be easy!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
One issue with old and long running code is that most bugs in the code and the runtime had happened and are fixed and some so called stable build is working.
The NASA had some time ago the problem, that the hardware was defect and no spare parts where available. I think they bought some 40 year old machine on ebay. The seller was shocked and thought he is in the crosshair of some conspiracy.
Never touch a running system
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
The space shuttle ran on a bunch of 8086's; about 15 years ago they were forced to buy a bunch of old hardware from bulk electronic scrap dealers on fleabay. They only bought them in bulk though, your 30+ year old relic would've been of no interest to them at the time.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Reading the comments, I like Ars Technica's voting system.. some posts went negative!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry; apple will soon be making cheap knock-offs.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I ordered one of them, but when I opened the box... it was dead.
|
|
|
|
|
I can offer you a quantum of solace..
(I'll fetch my coat)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Three years-worth of findings, based on data from 15,000 employees in 15+ countries through Know Your Company Do they really want to know what their employees think?
|
|
|
|
|
Most probably don't. I had to go thru what is called "Lean Training" for Construction several years ago. I then became a Instructor for a short time. The first meeting that we had with the guy that was in charge of the training (who was second in command on site), I told him of a problem where they scheduled 2 groups of workers (or more ) at the same location at the same time and who ever got there first got to work on their part of the project.
(Leaving the rest to stand and wait for a different direction to work)
His reply was "That's Construction"
What ?
Thinking to my self, No that is bad management.
As I said it was a short tour as instructor.
|
|
|
|
|
#4: “Is there any part of the company you wish you were able to interact with more?”
I'm thinking to myself "huh?". Maybe I live in an alternative universe, but the people I work with and myself are so slammed with projects, are heads are so far down in the project hole we don't know the weather.
These questions suggest there is another life out there with other employees, getting together, chatting, discussing strategy. I don't know if I am thinking marketing or the alternate universe.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
But where's "How stupid are they for not putting you in charge of everything?", with answers ranging from 100% upward.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The power of modern programming languages is that they are expressive, readable, concise, precise, and executable. That means we can eliminate middleman languages and use one language to explore, learn, teach, and think. Python is expressive and readable ?Quote: Students can use the algorithms first and learn how they work later. They can see the most important ideas, like spectral decomposition, without being blinded by details. They can work on real applications, on the first day, that provide the motivation to go deeper. And they can have a lot more fun. And, it is so important that the little snowflakes not be "triggered" by anything that might make them feel a little less than tranquil ?
[^]
«When I consider my brief span of life, swallowed up in an eternity before and after, the little space I fill, and even can see, engulfed in the infinite immensity of spaces of which I am ignorant, and which know me not, I am frightened, and am astonished at being here rather than there; for there is no reason why here rather than there, now rather than then.» Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that Python is no less expressive than many other languages out there. It takes some getting used to, but that is true of every new language. My major problem with Python's syntax is that it uses indentation to delimit blocks, which is error-prone (especially when refactoring).
That being said, I would not use Python for anything other than small, in-house programs. Given that there is no deterministic memory management, and (AFAIK) there is no Python compiler, it is unsuitable for large or for commercial programs.
I agree with you about the snowflakes. The entrance to the campus reads "University", no "Kindergarten"; if you can't handle that, you have no business being here.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|