|
The sensor works purely mechanically and doesn't require an external energy source. It simply utilizes the vibrational energy contained in sound waves Soon you can power your laptop by screaming at it?
You're probably doing it anyway, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Do they have similar stuff for vibrations?
I usually don't yell at it, but I hit the desk or stand up in a sudden move... (I have already frightened a couple of co-workers in my life )
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Europe's provisional AI legislation attempts to strike a tricky balance between promoting innovation and protecting citizens' rights. EU is on the case. Problem solved.
|
|
|
|
|
They are attempting... nobody said anything about accomplishing it.
And looking at they records, I really doubt that they will let any room to promote innovation... at all
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Jint is a Javascript interpreter for .NET which can run on any modern .NET platform as it supports .NET Standard 2.0 and .NET 4.6.2 targets (and later). Too busy to add security flaws of your own? Get your users to help.
|
|
|
|
|
More software developers than ever are relying on generative A.I. as part of their workflows. However, a new report suggests they’re using this technology in ways that might surprise you. If you can't add intelligence on your own, add some artificial?
Looks like it's time for @chris-maunder to add a survey question. (ducks and runs for cover)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Looks like it's time for @chris-maunder to add a survey question. (ducks and runs for cover) Mmm... summon didn't work...
And quoting parent message is broken again...
Yeah... I think you have to tell chris
P.S. LOL... in my quotation the summon worked?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: And quoting parent message is broken again...
Looks good to me.
And I'll speak to Kent later.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Looks good to me. weird... it now works for me again
whatever... I quitted trying to understand things a while ago
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The plan is to keep the world at bay by never recording it in the DNS root – like may already do with a subdomain for an intranet Free up all those 192.168 addresses!
Folks at internal.com will be forever confused (seems no one is on there. odd)
|
|
|
|
|
So, I need to get to my router and DNS is down...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so Microsoft's .home recommendation for home lab networks has come back around. Just another example of fads making comebacks.
|
|
|
|
|
IMO, this one should've happened years ago, probably.
I'm not 100% sold on it, but close.
The efficacy seems to hinge on how name resolution would be handled for those.
I'd guess it would be the same corporate DNS in many cases as it is now. The only real change being those DNS records won't propagate outside the internal DNS.
|
|
|
|
|
Last year was, by all accounts, a bloodbath for the tech industry, with more than 260,000 jobs vanishing — the worst 12 months for Silicon Valley since the dot-com crash of the early 2000s. "Money, money, money. Must be funny in the rich man's world"
|
|
|
|
|
Because one did it and got away with it so others are following suit. Leader, lemming they both start with L.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: Because one did it and got away with it so others are following suit. ...or the industry was grossly over employed and stock holders need to make a profit eventually.
MarkTJohnson wrote: Leader, lemming they both start with L. So do "losses" and "line of credit".
|
|
|
|
|
Because whe you talk about unions or worker rights a lot of people from a great country see red and start blasting.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
This is a long, but great article you will especially enjoy if you were coding back in 1993.
That was when my career was just starting.
I was reading Programming Windows 3.1 (Charles Petzold) and completely confused.
I also remember someone gave me a copy of VB 3.0 on three 3.5" disks.
CODE: 30 Years Ago[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that lots of us who were coding 30 years ago was doing it on Sun workstations running Solaris, on vaxen running VMS, some on IBM mainframes, some on various minis/superminis running proprietary OSes, and so on. We didn't really take PCs seriously, not as independent, complete solutions. They could do a good job as front ends to a larger machine, but for serious work, you had something more powerful.
1993 was near the turning point, though. Some had started taking PCs seriously, (maybe most) others had not. Not yet. I would say that Windows hadn't really grown up until W95. I could say that it wasn't fully mature until NTFS - sure, it was introduced in 1993, but didn't become widespread for another few years.
I was teaching at a tech. college 1990-95. We were running programming exercises on a proprietary mini, on X.11 workstations to an Alpha - and some PCs, e.g. for programming a simplified Kermit between two PCs.
To illustrate the level of PC 'seriousness': I took a class to a visit to Statoil, the oil company of the Norwegian state. The guide showed us the huge VAX machine handling all technical data from the oil fields. After processing, the data would be stored in an equally huge IBM mainframe database machine. Communication between IBM and others was always a RPITB. The IBMs could run Kermit, though. So we were shown a little IBM PC with two COM ports, one for running Kermit to the IBM, one for running another Kermit to the VAX. The PC acted as a relay moving data from the one Kermit interface to the other. (I don't remember why they couldn't have a direct Kermit link; my guess is that the PC did ASCII / EBCDIC conversion as part of the forwarding.)
My students shook their heads in disbelief. You can't transfer huge amounts of technical information, representing values of billions, using Kermit on a PC, over COM ports? Seriously?? The guide looked slightly ashamed when explaining, 'Well, this is what we could make work, and it works!'
I don't have the exact date for this; I would guess around 1994.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.
The article makes your same point in a different way...
It mentions Novell Netware and Win 3.11 for workgroups (networking just arising in the PC world).
Then, of course, NT had networking built in.
Connecting PCs for collaborative work in a business environment is really a necessity and since PCs couldn't do this before is probably why they weren't "taken seriously".
Once networking happened (and was simplified) it really made PCs take off.
|
|
|
|
|
The agonies and ecstasies of learning computers back then... My learning, in 1989.
We had a PC XT 286 in our University lab, and had Matlab installed. A senior told me that the PATH variable had been set, but I couldn't understand its implication. Therefore, I used to copy my program.m file from C:\User1 to the A:\ drive, and then copy this file from A:\ drive to the C:\Matlab folder (on the same PC XT), in order to run it. Then he came and saw, and had a big laugh. Only then did I understand the significance of PATH environment variable. An on-the-job kind of lesson.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a great story. I was working in tech support in 1991-92 and having to set up people's autoexec.bat and config.sys files to support the company software. They were really so cryptic.
And sometimes I had to talk a person through editing their config.sys files using edlin (do you remember that one?).
Also, at times I'd have to tell the user where a key was. "The 's' key is on the left side in the middle.
It was a form of torture that I endured to get my foot inside the IT industry.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: edlin
Not exactly edlin, but vi.
When i learnt vi editor on Unix, there have been instances where I've lost/overwritten source files. Only to rewrite them again. Since they were only college project files, it was okay.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 11's built-in archive support is getting new features to give users more flexibility and customization when working with ZIP, 7zip, and TAR archives without relying on third-party apps. How small do you want it?
Sadly, still no password support
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 11 can be reduced to a command-line interface, known as Minwin, resembling the graphically simple Command Prompt. I think they call that DOS
|
|
|
|