|
|
Notepad.exe has been going for years without updates; the current "improvements" are not enough to get one to download notepad since there's better products out there at the same price (free). It's only advantage was that it was part of the system, and as such, you'd always have it preinstalled.
If it is not preinstalled, it is not worth the effort of installing.
IMO, "updating" the application with those new features is a waste of money and resources
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: it is not worth the effort of installing. Many other "text processors" keep the original format.
I do use it as a mid-stop to avoid moving propietary formats between applications, and for that is one of the best I have seen
Additionally this helps to spot weird chars in URLs too
If they haven't changed that... I think it still is worth the download.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Any textbox can do that; you could use the CodeProject forum for that even - just remember to not submit your clipboards' contents
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Scientists manning gravitational wave detectors have reported picking up on vibrations from a distant cosmic collision which eerily harmonizes with the opening chords in Elvis Presley’s 1961 hit ‘I Can’t Help Falling in Love With You’ Elvis never died, he just returned to the stars
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Elvis never died, he just returned to the stars Men in Black already told it. Even several years ago...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And people thought it was fiction!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall who told it but:
"What today is written as science fiction, might tomorrow be remembered as a reportage"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: "What today is written as science fiction, might tomorrow be remembered as a reportage" And it seems likely that what is said today as reportage will tomorrow be thought of as comedy.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: And it seems likely that what is said today as reportage will tomorrow be thought of as comedy. Or as a big
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Elvis never died, he just returned to the stars He didn't even have to return to them - he always was there, with them.
|
|
|
|
|
Note that another team that noticed this insisted that it was a sign of an advanced civilisation on an exoplanet they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered.
And another team insisted that it was a sign of a different advanced civilisation on an exoplanet that they had just invented discovered
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It’s time to get jazzed about the future of the .NET ecosystem! A chance to rewrite all your .NET Framework apps?
|
|
|
|
|
I have today been looking for a bit of information regarding this, because our App is facing a new major version (total re-do).
What a headache...
.Net Framework is a bit risky for the future, we are already re-doing the basics, don't want to do a big port in a couple of years.
.Net 5 is not released yet and as always the first versions are going to be a bit "dangerous"
.Net Core 3.0 or 3.1 is a start, they are already out there long enough to have grown a bit stability and madurity. But... If you don't trust the "start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial"
Good that I am not the one having to decide (although I have to debate it too)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial
WHY do you have to port YET AGAIN? It's all crap.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
That's exactly my thought and my problem.
I don't trust it will be that trivial. They have already messed it up several times, so why should this time be different?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: .Net 5 is not released yet and as always the first versions are going to be a bit "dangerous"
.Net Core 3.0 or 3.1 is a start, they are already out there long enough to have grown a bit stability and madurity. But... If you don't trust the "start doing it in .Net Core, porting it to .Net 5 will be trivial"
There's a document somewhere that the Longterm Servicing (LTS) Version of .NET 5 will be .NET 6 next year. So if you decide to upgrade it's probably best to skip 5 and target 6, at which point it will be much more solid and, being LTS, you can relax for the next decade.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know, thanks.
Pity that we'll need / have to start our re-do in near future.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you can. Lots of deprecated functionality...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It goes up to Five!
That's one higher than all the other .NETs!
Most blokes will be coding at four!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: That's one higher than all the other .NETs! That actually is their intention behind this versioning.
They jumped the .Net Core 4.xx to avoid confusion with current .Net Frameworks
And the .Net 5.xx should symbolize, this is the new version as the future of both Framework and Core.
On the one hand, seems logical.
On the other hand... if they wouldn't come with one shiny new product so fast, the confusion with versions and compatibilities would be way smaller.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
On the fifth anniversary of Windows 10, we look back at what it was supposed to be and what it ultimately became. Almost nothing turned out as planned, and that’s OK. The last version of Windows...until the next one
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: The last version of Windows...until the next one Hey... don't be so... it still is Windows 10, no version changed
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a triumph for the nascent industry of "satellite servicing," an aging communications satellite has returned to service in geostationary orbit. "Oh rise and show your power"
|
|
|
|