|
The controversial feature won’t ship alongside Copilot Plus PCs. A Recall recall
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recall? 
If you can't find time to do it right the first time, how are you going to find time to do it again?
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Which one?
Arnold or Collin?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: Which one?
Arnold or Collin?
I call those Total Retard. 
If you can't find time to do it right the first time, how are you going to find time to do it again?
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.4.0 (Many new features) JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
One of the few scenarios for us older one's, where not being able to Recall is a good thing.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Ars Technica has had a few very interesting articles about this. My previous remark calling it a debacle seems to be an understatement. For their CEO to proclaim security is their highest priority and then to come up with this is completely clueless of them, to put it lightly. If I were him there would be a LOT of bonuses withheld, if not terminations. It is entirely inexcusable. That is, if his proclamation had any truth to it at all and considering this is Microsoft that is uncertain, at best.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
i hope they just make it an optional feature. no single person on the planet asked for it. seems like some program manager at Microsoft needed to keep his job doing something..cause all they do is polish icons.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Just like 1 + 1, the concept of mathematical equality is one that is far from simple or universal – and that’s becoming a big problem. How about equalish?
|
|
|
|
|
Well there is
Java == (because = is the assignment operator)
Delphi = (because := is the assignment operator)
Javascript has == AND === (I'll let someone else explain that)
Is this what they are meaning? Because other than that, 2 = 2 doesn't seem that complicated.
No it isn't becoming a big problem, it's only a big problem for mathematicians who don't operate in the real world.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
The math is beyond my interest level, but it does seem to be very much an edge case scenario. Something along the lines of “how can we tell that these two sets are completely identical?”
Plus, it gives him a chance to take a lame potshot at Russell.
Yeah, math jerk.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm... I didn't read it as a swipe at Russell.
I did read it as similar/related to some fringe stuff I was saying about Terrence Howard's assertion that 0 does not exist though. Pretty sure he happens to be right about that one.
To have =, you need 0. Why? Because that's the supposed 'difference' on either side? Integers are useful illusions. It's fine and very useful to pretend, but if there is no real-world corollary, it's definitely just pretending?
The Piraha of the Amazon have no real concept of numbers, no words for them. From what I understand, it goes back to their culture basically thinking there is no =. No two stones, fruits, whatever, are alike, and so you can't really "equate" them just by assigning an integer and to do so is so foreign it's not even taboo, but just impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
(1 egotistical mathematician) + (concept of equality) = idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, neither are programmers.
Consider:
class A
{
};
class B : public A
{
}
bool operator=(A const& lhs, A const& rhs);
B b;
A a = b;
if (a == b) {
}
You could claim that the result should be "false", because a and b are manifestly not equal, but the Standard requires us to compare only the 'A' components of each variable, and therefore a and b are equal.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Makes me think of that English teacher pointing out to the student: "That that that that that refers to is is not the same that that that that refers to!"
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
1 + 1 = 3 for very large values of 1.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo fired more than a dozen employees from its wealth and investment management division in May after the bank investigated claims that they were faking work, according to a media report. If the mouse is jerking, I might be working
|
|
|
|
|
The real question is why is Wells Fargo using keyboard activity to define productivity? It sounds to me like those workers figured out management's game and exploited it.
|
|
|
|
|
Technically, they could be playing solitaire....
That's not the best story of being "productive." Where is that story where the engineer outsourced his work to someone in China?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
The days where engineers only take orders from higher ups and complete the tasks they are told to do may be over. ...really? Really?!
|
|
|
|
|
At least the circle is swinging back towards the saner side now!
The problem is that all shops are scattered all around it on the timeline so it's like a box of chocolates.
The rise of Agile saw PMs and walking talking bags of acronyms trying to wedge themselves between developers and business because that's the only way many of them could have ever remotely been perceived to be providing value.
I don't know how it is that we can have people driving a bus without input from the technical when most stakeholders and business leaders are decidedly less technical than the people they are paying to build their tech.
In my view, everyone should be a "dev"... Not really, just know enough that they could take an entry level job as a coder and do ok. That's unrealistic, but it's more the bar/goal where I think we should be for how much technology drives all of our lives. A modicum of understanding is simply prudent and the world would be better for it.
The big problem with this sticking the nerds in a closet and letting the others chuck workload over the fence is that you just don't ever know what you don't know. Trying totally ignore your ignorance will not make mis-steps or missed opportunities arising from lack of knowledge any better. It does go both ways... there are plenty of 'domain' things and such developers do not know. You really really want them to. They're not going to 'get there' if they're not included.
It's not that developers need to "drive the business". It's that if you aren't strapping them in and asking them to help navigate, you can't really expect anything but failure or a success that fell far short of its potential.
It does take all kinds too though. The real word is collaboration. It's been quietly maligned since the first IBM PC. Rather than have corporo-political power structures eroded/altered, many have the inclination to chuck it under a bus. There's nothing wrong with a dev who doesn't really get the business domain (depending), or an exec/stakeholder who doesn't understand tech. The problems come from having all that with basically no linkage between them aside from someone who has a degree in burndown charts.
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, and cannabis is legal now in many states... I don't buy this for a second. Nonsense fluff article. Want some proof?
Try to negotiate stock options or profit sharing for a big project. I dare you.
Ask for more direct $$ - not some BS "the division has a profit sharing plan."
Strategic? Put your $$ where your mouth is. This is just drivel.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
While Windows 11’s Paint Creator uses Microsoft’s cloud to generate AI images based on your prompts, Paint Cocreator turns your drawing/outline into an AI masterpiece locally, thanks to NPU. Or to put it another way: another feature you won't be using
|
|
|
|
|
I can't even figure out how to use the Paint 3D app, and now this!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has been doing a better job of marketing for Linux than anyone could have dreamed of. When they get really obnoxious about dropping support for W10 I suspect Linux will see a flood of Windoze refugees.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote: When they get really obnoxious about dropping support for W10 I suspect Linux will see a flood of Windoze refugees.
The great, great majority of Windows users won't know. Their problem solutions will continue to solve their problems. Nothing will abruptly stop. Nothing will stop at all, if we are talking about Windows applications in use for solving problems for users.
Besides: The end of W10 support does not automatically lead to the availability of tens of thousands of Linux applications ready to solve the problems that the Windows applications handled. Even if OS support ends, software houses will continue giving application support.
Users will continue using their W10 machines until one of their primary applications, one that their business (or private life) is critically dependent on, comes in a new revision with extensions absolutely required by the user, and this new application version is not available for Windows 10. Software houses may be using W11+ functionality, but not for many years will they unconditionally require W11+. Maybe in one case, or four, but not in the other ten thousands. That didn't happen with any previous Windows (or other OS) revision; it won't happen this time.
I am not aware that any of the applications I use cannot be run under Windows 7. If my problems are solved to my satisfaction by my current set of applications, it is highly unlikely that there will come an application revision so fundamental to me that I cannot continue without it. If that is the case, getting a W11+ machine is a viable option. It is probably far less risky than going to another OS, and, at the same time, to a completely new set of applications for all my tasks, crossing my fingers that they cover all my tasks, with all the functionality of the Windows versions of all the applications - including that new functionality that I critically depend on, the one that made me abandon the W10 application suite.
Most users use PCs primarily to solve problems. Not to run an OS.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
