|
and all with the same algorithm as well.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: and all with the same algorithm as well. But sadly won't be like this... too many "mine is better" ego maniacs out there.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: all with the same algorithm as well. Which I agree with, but many vehicles could then possibly do the wrong thing at the same time (or place), which is a little unnerving.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
All they have to do is program them to sing '99 bottles of beer on the wall.' You always get where you are going when you sing that!
|
|
|
|
|
While I don't know if fully autonomous driving will ever become a reality, this guy is ignoring the fact that just the development of these systems has already improved highway safety. He comes across as "if it's not perfect, don't do it."
|
|
|
|
|
Highway I could live with, but I don't think it could/should be used in cities.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Yet it's in the cities where the biggest safety improvements have occurred.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure?
DAS (driving assistance system) and ADAS (autonomous driving...) are not the same.
ACC = Automatic cruise control
Change Line warning
Park assistance (Ultrasonic sensoric or camera)
and many others
Are DAS.
The ADAS that are needed for real autonomous driving are still way too "young" to be considered mature for production, they actually are not present in the wide markt yet. Therefore it is difficult to see big safety improvements due to them.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Tesla's FSD so far has had a single digit number of crashes and the number of people using it has grown exponentially as each new version is released. Most FSD usage is in cities.
|
|
|
|
|
LinkedIn Learning is partnering with CoderPad to launch over 30 new coding courses in Python, Java, SQL, JavaScript, C#, and Go, designed to help learners at all levels build today’s most in-demand coding skills through interactive exercises and real-time feedback. And we'll only send you a few (dozen) emails a day
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And we'll only send you a few (dozen) emails a day I registered at work. So far I didn't receive any email (and I doubt that I have to thank that to the IT Desk in the background)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It teamed up with Chess.com to add the classic game to the sidebar. "WOULDN'T YOU PREFER A NICE GAME OF CHESS?"
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Dave, shall we play a game?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Users can opt in to give the AI access to their own silo of Google content for more personalized results. Give Google more of my information? Where do I sign up?
And was that a purple crayon, turquoise, or powder blue?
|
|
|
|
|
If it really is an opt in... then is fine
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it is Google's definition of 'opt in.' Take that for what it is worth.
|
|
|
|
|
SprySOCKS borrows from open source Windows malware and adds new tricks. I guess they have more eyes than the Linux developers
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I guess they have more eyes than the Linux developers And more time and more money in the background and more...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
According to the Windows Insider Program Team blog post, the new feature leverages users’ browsing history to populate the Recommended section with websites. Plenty of room on that menu, go ahead and add a bunch of stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: leverages users’ browsing history
Someone has failed to understand that the word "history" means, roughly, "been there, done that, don't need to do it again." Besides, that's so old tech. Where's the newfangled AI that will instead recommend completely fresh sites I've never visited and never would want to visit?
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: ...the word "history" means, roughly, "been there, done that, don't need to do it again... except for CP, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely agree. I bought a ceiling fan at Home Depot and sent the receipt to my email. For the next three months I received daily advertisements from Home Depot for ceiling fans. What a complete waste of Home Depot's time to have their programmers send me advertisements for a product I had already purchased.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, a DIYer isn't likely to want the same product-type again in a hurry.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Where's the newfangled AI that will instead recommend completely fresh sites I've never visited and never would want to visit? How do you know that's not exactly what it does? It can use your history to decide what new sites to show you. It doesn't say it will populate the recommended sites area with sites from your history.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: It doesn't say it will populate the recommended sites area with sites from your history. Touché. You make a good point!
|
|
|
|