|
According to her profile - "Since 1992, Esther Schindler has made a living by translating from Geek into English. Find her on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+, where she’s sure to distract you from getting productive work accomplished." What would she know about coding?
|
|
|
|
|
A good programmer isnt a great software developer. Only writing superior code isnt enough: you need to communicate in a excellent manner want you made and bargain good interfaces, salaries and benefits. And also have a wundeful life "outside the coding universe"
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
You’re only as agile as your ability to ship frequently – and without drama. see: No true Scotsman fallacy
|
|
|
|
|
The likelihood of any lesson being learned is a function of the time between the cause and the pain - which is why people rarely burn themselves on a stove twice but more commonly purchase and eat very hot curries.
(i.e. yes you should move fast and break things but you should immediately know they are broken - not at the end of the next sprint)
|
|
|
|
|
You’re only as agile as your ability to ship frequently
"Shipping frequently" is great when you're in the prototyping and development stage, where "shipping" means putting your software in front of people (usually internal to the company) to test a new feature you just prototyped or implemented.
"Shipping frequently" when you have delivered an RTM is pretty much a sign of one or more of:
- a poorly designed product
- a buggy product
- a product with crappy UI/UX (pretty much every website, right? Except Code Project of course!)
- a product that doesn't meet customer requirements (not that the customer knew what they wanted)
in my opinion.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Well, there is a difference between "shipping frequently" and "ability to ship frequently".
To put things right: Do you frequently ship crappy products, or are you able to ship great products frequently?
Many companies do the first, hardly anyone can do the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
Passive Wi-Fi consumes 1/10,000th the power of conventional wireless networks. Now you'll only glow a fraction as much
|
|
|
|
|
In this blog post, I’ll share our experience porting MSBuild to .NET Core. You may find this helpful if you are porting code to .NET Core, and it will also serve to highlight areas of the porting experience that are ripe for improvement. "Here be dragons"
|
|
|
|
|
The Spiceworks data team today reported the data on Windows 10 adoption after crunching some numbers from anonymized, aggregated usage data. And 7% believe Elvis is still alive
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And 7% believe Elvis is still alive But Elvis is alive !
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
If Elvis was still alive he would be dead by now
|
|
|
|
|
And it includes those 27 virtual machines we have for testing and no one touches...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
"I do believe that with the right safeguards, there are cases where the government, on our behalf — like stopping terrorism, which could get worse in the future — that that is valuable." For those who have been waiting for His Billness' opinion
|
|
|
|
|
Explains a lot about so many of the Microsoft products I've used (and not used).
There are two types of people in this world: those that pronounce GIF with a soft G, and those who do not deserve to speak words, ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Just goes to show the creative genius of the past wasn't by Microsoft... they just copied. His lack of foresight is saddening.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
that's not surpise... heck... just have a look to Win10
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Articulate as ever, I see.
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
MasterCard says it plans to bring "selfie pay" security checks to more than a dozen countries. Last year, the company started trialling the technology — which uses facial recognition to authenticate users' identity — but now says it has firm plans to roll the feature out to users after positive reactions from testers. You kids can get off my lawn now
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: and MasterCard says its algorithms can tell when someone is trying to fool the system by using a video Oh...Sure...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
A quick insight into overloading ".", as required for smart references:
isocpp.org[^]
Worth it for a single quote alone: "C++ protects against Murphy, not Machiavelli".
Sadly it is mentioned at a quote, but has no attribution in that article. Possibly Herb Sutter, a similar phrase crops up here: GOTW[^]
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
SkiaSharp provides a powerful C# API for doing 2D graphics powered by Google’s Skia library, the same library that powers Google Chrome, Firefox, and Android’s graphic stacks. Because System.Drawing is so last century
|
|
|
|
|
TypeScript 1.8 provides full support for module augmentation, delivers a stronger type system with string literal types, and catches even more common bugs with smarter control flow analysis. For those who like their var to be a little more detailed
|
|
|
|
|
If you’re not familiar and don’t have time to read the linked Wikipedia page, SOLID is a mnemonic acronym for five principles of object oriented programming or, as I hinted, really just programming in general (except, perhaps for the Liskov Substitution Principle). These concepts have been around since at least the early 2000s and have truly stood the test of time. "And now it's solid. Solid as a rock"
|
|
|
|
|
She's a brick house!
|
|
|
|
|
SOLID is way overrated! They have unsuccessfully tried to sell it for many years for the simple reason it is nothing of any useful sort at all!
I rather much prefer the KISS methodology! With an occasional spike of intellectual effort, to make it more simple the rest of the time!
I would go further, if it's not KISS, it's worthless!
I am looking at you the many (many many) multi layered abstraction layers architectures....
|
|
|
|