|
Yeah but who will over seeing the over see'r?
That proverbial eye in the sky?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
Time to develop 'Likes blocker'
|
|
|
|
|
adblocker already does that
|
|
|
|
|
Damn, they stole my idea
|
|
|
|
|
Time to not bother to sign up.
Check..
Done.
|
|
|
|
|
RossMW wrote: Time to not bother to sign up.
As it was going to do such a big difference
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck with that, Faceplant.
I block 100% of all Internet ads. Also, 100% of all radio, TV, telemarketer ads.
Any spam I get in the mail I use to start my wood-stove.
I pity the people who use that "service" and willingly give their private information to them.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: "Surely ... not moi !
If it comes to click the "like" buttons... surely neither moi.
The problem is, that I don't think it is even needed to click them
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I just don't "like" anything! Simples!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: It will then use the information it collects to target ads to non-Facebook users. "Surely ... not moi ! I just shared your message on Facebook. They know you now. They're not happy. You best sleep with one eye open
Seriously though, I signed up for Facebook about a year ago. I never wanted it because I believed you can't "sign up for friendship" and "I really don't need to know what you harvested in Farmville."
I won't say it's the best thing I ever did, because it isn't (signing up on here did my a lot more good!), but it isn't as bad as I thought it would be.
People actually share fun stuff (besides the kittens and cats, which alone make it worth it) like new music and movie releases, political views, and funny comics. And I get invited to parties once in a while
Surely people also share a lot of rubbish (mostly pregnancies, babies, and "I'm a Disney princess! Which princess are you?"), but I just read past that and filter out the good stuff
As for privacy, "they" know all about me already. Google does, my government does, the American government probably does as well, some other websites, including CodeProject, does. Facebook might as well do too (if they didn't already).
|
|
|
|
|
That's OK; if you weren't blocking it, their like/share button widgets that've been blighting the web since creation already were tracking you. (And so do most of the equivalents for rival platforms.)
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Google should get the movie rights and make even more money from Oracle!
|
|
|
|
|
The US Department of Labor projects that one million jobs in computing will go unfilled by 2020. Candy Code Reviews reported unsuccessful.
|
|
|
|
|
"The US Department of Labor projects that one million jobs in computing will go unfilled by 2020."
Putting aside the completely made up number, most the jobs have nothing to do with coding and many aren't very good, though could lead to something good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed the subject line for you.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Misconceptions and 'best practices' may have your team spinning wheels rather than continuously churning out productive code It wouldn't be Friday without a judgemental listicle.
|
|
|
|
|
This could be shortened to:
1) Doing Agile
|
|
|
|
|
Why can I only thumbs-up this once?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you! Apparently I needed a Project Manager for that.
I'll show myself out...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: To remediate this, remember that the main goal is to deliver working software, not to follow a recipe; there is no recipe that always works for every project and team. Therefore, let each team adopt their own practices and take responsibility for adjusting and improving them.
This is a wonderful idea as long as your teams are totally rigid and personnel never move between or work in multiple teams at once. In that case, everyone doing their completely different thing makes any sort of staffing agility a nightmarish cluster elephant.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: In that case, everyone doing their completely different thing makes any sort of staffing agility a nightmarish cluster elephant Not every one but every project. There's a huge difference. You just need to ensure your developers are flexible and adaptable.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Agile practice needs not only organized team members but also the members should know what to do as being a self sufficient. This is very important. Else you will end up with stand up meeting without doing nothing and finally you will deliver your MOM to the client which is a failure.
|
|
|
|