Algorithms Discussion Boards

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active11-Oct-10 7:20

Not Active

11-Oct-10 7:20

It seemed to be clear to everyone else

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

grgran11-Oct-10 10:54

grgran

11-Oct-10 10:54

Ok, wow ... ummmm, your welcome?

Re: Find an algorithm

frank3311-Oct-10 6:56

frank33

11-Oct-10 6:56

have you tried a Karnaugh map?

Frank

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active11-Oct-10 7:21

Not Active

11-Oct-10 7:21

You mean like Member 4190501 suggested over 10 hours ago. If you also read the responses you would see the problem was solved long ago.

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

ashishpahlaz13-Oct-10 0:50

ashishpahlaz

13-Oct-10 0:50

result = ((f&&f1) || (d&&d1) || (r&&r1)) && (f||f1) && (d||d1) && (r||r1)

Re: Find an algorithm

Luc Pattyn13-Oct-10 2:37

Luc Pattyn

13-Oct-10 2:37

incorrect, none of the test cases have (f||f1) true.

Hmmm | :|

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

Re: Find an algorithm

ashishpahlaz15-Oct-10 4:20

ashishpahlaz

15-Oct-10 4:20

result = ((f&&f1) || (d&&d1) || (r&r1)) && (f==f1) && (d==d1) && (r==r1);

Re: Find an algorithm

Tadeusz Westawic28-Oct-10 3:45

Tadeusz Westawic

28-Oct-10 3:45

Is it simply the number of TRUE arguments passed?

No TRUE args ==> FALSE
even no of TRUE args ==> TRUE
Otherwise ==> FALSE

Confused | :confused:

Tadeusz Westawic

Sum quid sum.

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active28-Oct-10 7:35

Not Active

28-Oct-10 7:35

What are you confused about? Perhaps you are confused that the problem had been solved 18 days ago by people how were not confused. Confused | :confused:

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

Tadeusz Westawic28-Oct-10 9:29

Tadeusz Westawic

28-Oct-10 9:29

There are unanswered posts of my own that are months old and I would still appreciate any other point of view as long as it is mathematically valid and programmable. Are you saying my post is illegal?

Take off that heavy badge once in a while.

Tadeusz Westawic

Sum quid sum.

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active28-Oct-10 13:34

Not Active

28-Oct-10 13:34

Tadeusz Westawic wrote:
There are unanswered posts of my own

There is the difference. This post was answered by several people quite a long time ago.

Tadeusz Westawic wrote:
Are you saying my post is illegal?

losen up and perhaps vist more often

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

fjdiewornncalwe28-Oct-10 4:14

fjdiewornncalwe

28-Oct-10 4:14

( ( d && dl ) && ( r && rl ) ) || ( (d && dl) && ( !r && !rl) ) || ( (!d && !dl) && ( r && rl ) )

I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active28-Oct-10 7:36

Not Active

28-Oct-10 7:36

Only 18 days after everyone else. Glad it wasn't urgentz

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

fjdiewornncalwe28-Oct-10 10:33

fjdiewornncalwe

28-Oct-10 10:33

I didn't even notice that. Man, do I suck... Big Grin | :-D

I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

Re: Find an algorithm

Radhakrishnan G.3-Nov-10 5:03

Radhakrishnan G.

3-Nov-10 5:03

private void Logic( bool f1, bol f2, bool f3, bool f4, bool f5, bool f6, bool expected)
{
	bool result = ((!f1) && (!f2) && f5 && f6 && ( ((!f3) && (!f4))  || ( f3 && f4 )));
	System.Diagnostics.Debug.Assert( result == expected, "Does not match expected results" );
}

Re: Find an algorithm

RobCroll9-Nov-10 7:06

RobCroll

9-Nov-10 7:06

yeah I know it was answered a while ago but here is a slightly more elegant algorithm

bool result = (f == fl) && (d == dl) && (r == rl) ? f | d | r : false;

or in a less descriptive form

bool result = f == fl && d == dl && r == rl && f | d | r;

modified on Tuesday, November 9, 2010 6:28 PM

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active9-Nov-10 12:10

Not Active

9-Nov-10 12:10

Such a timely response Roll eyes | :rolleyes:

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

RobCroll9-Nov-10 12:50

RobCroll

9-Nov-10 12:50

Well I teach at college so I didn't want to think I was doing your homework for you. Poke tongue | ;-P

Re: Find an algorithm

Not Active9-Nov-10 13:05

Not Active

9-Nov-10 13:05

Robert Croll wrote:
Well I teach at college

What course do you teach, procrastination?

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Re: Find an algorithm

RobCroll9-Nov-10 13:35

RobCroll

9-Nov-10 13:35

Can I get back to you on that?

arXiv.org

Bassam Abdul-Baki6-Oct-10 0:58

Bassam Abdul-Baki

6-Oct-10 0:58

Anyone here a member of arXiv.org, preferably the math/math.NT forum?

Thanks!

Crossword generation

Sunasara Imdadhusen4-Oct-10 3:06

Sunasara Imdadhusen

4-Oct-10 3:06

Hi Expert,

I want to create a game to generate random Crossword with only Word and Clue,
Please do let me know, if you have any Algorithm, Code or Reference link. Rose | [Rose]

Thanks,
Imdadhusen

sunaSaRa Imdadhusen
+91 99095 44184
+91 02767 284464

Re: Crossword generation

Richard MacCutchan4-Oct-10 3:26

Richard MacCutchan

4-Oct-10 3:26

It is unlikely that there is a simple algorithm for such a situation, for example take a look at this clue[^], any algorithm to solve it would have to be very complicated indeed.

Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

Re: Crossword generation

Ian Shlasko4-Oct-10 3:56

Ian Shlasko

4-Oct-10 3:56

I think he's talking about a program to build a crossword puzzle, given a database of clues and answers. Not one to solve the puzzle.

Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

Re: Crossword generation

Richard MacCutchan4-Oct-10 5:38

Richard MacCutchan

4-Oct-10 5:38

Yes, the word "Algorithm" threw me.

Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.