|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: You don't need to
I would call that cumulative.
incremental to me means you have to do them in sequence.
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, This is not my day, and coffee doesn't seem to help.
|
|
|
|
|
loyal ginger wrote: This USB device can perform faster if you connect it to a Hi-Speed USB 2.0 port.
That means that the driver is installed and working. USB may be optimized for quick removal (in which case Windows doesn't cache much) or optimized for performance (and then Windows will cache some, but corrupts your drive if you yank it out while reading).
Default setting is "quick removal". You're getting a hint from Windows that the current setting is not ideal. Your USB device can perform faster - just as it says in the balloon.
I are Troll 
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys,
I jsut recently baught a Asus 23" Monitor and its working great, but my problem is that it is currently only working with the VGA port. The wirte is connected to the VGA port on the monitor and to a DVI on the Graphics card via an adapter from VGA to DVI.
Now i wanted to connect the monitor to the graphics card via a DVI to HDMI cable and when I tried this the monitor isn't displaying any picture it just says no signal. I tried DVI-I to HDMI and DVI-D to HDMI cables and still no difference. The only difference is that when i use the DVI-I to HDMI cable the monitor said no signal found and when i used the other one the monitor didn't even display a message.
My Graphics card is BFG Nvidia 9800 GTX if that makes any difference.
Can anyone please help me with the problem your help is greatly appreciated. Thank you from adavance.
Regards,
Christian Pace
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried the button on the monitor to switch the input it's looking for a signal on? If it's looking on the VGA input you can send all the HDMI you want and it won't do a lick of good.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Yes OFC im not that stupid. When i change it to HDMI it says no signal found.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi...
we are used dongle in our application.. if once the dongle was safe remove .. that must be unplug and plug is manually .... i need first of all is possible to activate problematically not like unplug method... if is any command prompt, please share with me....
Thankyou
|
|
|
|
|
Please reply.
I have the source for This, but it is in Delphi 3, and too old for C# or C++
Can anyone convert/rewrite the source to C++ or C#?
modified on Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:00 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but i did get the LED's working, It is just the servo app sending the pulses that has a problem, the sevos are a bit shakey and moves a little every few seconds by itself. I got the Delphy 3 source, but cannot find delphy 3 anymore, and would love to get my hands on C# or C++ code that would move the sevo's.
Please if there is anyone out there that can help i would really appreciate this. 
|
|
|
|
|
What I meant was, you could modify the code from the articles to suit your purposes. It shouldn't be hard if you know what kind of signal is required to drive the motor. I'm assuming you already have the interfacing hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
Please help with this
The problem is that there are no pic or basic stamp controller, it connects directly on the parallel port with only a resistor on all 8 data pins, and i do not have any experience with PWM (Pulse Width Modulator-or someting like this) pulse code, or to be honnest not much experience with Visual Studio 2008 at all, or hardware programming.
If someone will be so kind to help me just with some code to control 2 servo motors by sending a pulse to the servo motors, and make them move, even beter if you can use a up and down left & right arrow to control them , up & down for (servo 1) & left & right for (servo 2). I will then have an idea how to add more servo's for future use.
Please guys help me with this.
I am sure there are guys out there that will be able to do this in a few minutes, without even breaking a sweat.
Thank you. 
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you are using an old operating system (DOS, Win98), I believe it is next to impossible to get the kind of timing that is required for driving a servo.
A servo needs a pulse between 1 and 2 ms long, repeated every 20 ms or so. There are some servo's that are outside this timing, but that's pretty general. At 1 ms, the servo will be fully counter clockwise - left, and at 2 ms will be fully clockwise -right. The control is getting the time somewhere in the middle and being able to repeat it accurately every 20 ms or so, until you want it somewhere else.
So....the problem is the newer operating system control the hardware through an abstraction layer, such that you no longer have machine level interface (i.e. direct access to the parallel port) or the IRQ's and interrupts, and therefore cannot guarantee when things happen. LED's are one thing since if they are on 20 - 30 ms longer than desired, who cares, but with a servo, it will be jumping all over the place.
Now, if you are running an old system, that is different, and it is possible in C or assembler, if you hook the interrupts and do the pin toggling yourself, and some of that information will be available out there. Otherwise, you will need an interface chip like the PIC or ATMEL, etc. That code isn't exactly trivial but is easier than using a PC as a PIC.
Not exactly the answer you were looking for, but you should clarify your hardware platform (hint, VS-2008 indicates XP or Vista), and understand the complexities of the hardware abstraction layers put in place to protect us from ourselves.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
RTek23 wrote: . Otherwise, you will need an interface chip like the PIC or ATMEL, etc. That code isn't exactly trivial but is easier than using a PC as a PIC.
I think you can get hard millisecond level control in some realtime linux versions, if you're really determined not to do it the smart way.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Good day
Thank you very much for your posts.
I have managed to get my hands on a 4 servo app, i am sure it will work properly if it could be tweaked a bit, but i do not have the experience or Delphy 3. Please fillow this link to see the app that i am using.
It works fine & smooth, except for every few seconds there is a little shake. see: http://users.swing.be/philippe.jadin/servoen.htm[^] for how it was done, I am also using an app called porttalk to access the port directly in XP see here: http://www.beyondlogic.org/porttalk/porttalk.htm[^] . if anyone can help, let me know.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
I want to develop a dongle for my software. but I dont know anything about writing code to any pendrive's boot sector or making pendrive as dongle.
I also want to get some help about how to read the data from the prepapred dongle from my software,that is i want to know how to link the dongle with my software.
The s/w I have developed is a windows application in .net with C#
please help if anyone can.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know how you intended to make a dongle out of a pendrive.
Very simplified, a dongle is a piece of hardware that your software sends a serialnumber to. this serialnumber is compared to a value stored in a PROM in the dongle. The result is then sent to the program which is compared with the expected result. This whole process is done with hashing and encryption/decryption in both directions so that you can't find out the stored value in any easy way.
On a pendrive you can easily copy all of the content and thereby duplicate as many "dongles" as you need.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to learn how to create hardware keys. I have seen the software like AntiDuplicate have worked with Hasps.
I am fascinated with the idea of using Hardware keys. Earlier it used to be a serial port key and not USBs have replaced them.
Is there a way by which a normal USB key can be converted into a Hardware Key for Software Protection?
|
|
|
|
|
So far all USB memory sticks I have seen contain a manufacturer string and a unique ID within each manufacturer (each with a different syntax though). So yes you can use those as the base for some kind of hardware-based software protection. You would need a couple of WMI classes to get the information; they do work in user mode, even on Vista and presumably also Win7.
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Luc,
That's great to know. any suggested readings for getting those unique IDs? So far, all I came across are basically for permanent disks and not for removable ones.
One more thing I want to know is whether there is a way to prevent writing to USB disk without a password may be?
Whatever solutions (making USB disk write protected) I have seen so far are based on registry and hence machine specific...
|
|
|
|
|
google terms: USB, serialNumber, Win32_DiskDrive, Win32_LogicalDiskToPartition, Win32_PhysicalMedia
I have a USB stick with a write-protect switch, unknown manufacturer
AFAIK all solutions with read-only device, or hidden second partition, require a special driver
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I have done that... and will further be digging into it. Google mostly returns AntiDuplicate or other paid solution sites. nothing to read on or learn.
Usually, talking to someone who knows better than me, helps a lot. Thanks a lot.
If you know of some library on codeproject or any such developer website, it would be helpful.
Apart from this,
I was also trying to find some library which could access a TrueCrypt partition from the code. That would sort a lot of issues actually.
|
|
|
|
|
A manufacturer string and a unique ID do not provide good protection.
There are USB controller manufacturer's utilities that can imitate the same parameters for other USB stick.
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
There are a variety of USB-based microcontrollers available; evaluation kits can be had for $100 or less. The normal approach for hardware copy protection is to have a key receive a packet of data from the PC, munge the data, and send it back. The PC can then check whether it got what it expects.
The amount of time and effort you spend on the dongle code will depend greatly upon your perceived threat model. Ideally, there would be some algorithm used in your code which (1) did not require a large bandwidth for inputs and outputs; (2) did not require an enormous amount of CPU power to compute; and (3) could not be readily inferred by examining inputs and outputs. A roll-playing game, for example, might put some aspects of a character's AI into the dongle. If the character is supposed to do something special if it enters the room with the golden fiddle, and the code for that behavior is only in the dongle and not in the PC-loaded software, even someone with full source code for the PC software wouldn't be able to "crack" the game to run properly without the dongle.
If there aren't any "useful but obscure" algorithms that can be usefully put into the dongle, security will be much tougher. It wouldn't be hard to write a dongle that takes 8 bytes, encrypts them with some secret DES key, and sends them back, but someone who reverse-engineered the PC-side code could then imitate out the dongle. Using a public-key system like RSA would be better, but even if someone couldn't imitate the dongle the code that requires it could likely be bypassed.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Everyone,
I was just reading about Killer NIC's[^],
RDMA[^] and TCP/IP Offload Engine Technology[].
And I was thinking, especially about the RDMA which seemed like a very interesting idea, which coupled with the TOE architecture in a modern NIC (although apparently found almost exclusively in servers currently), and my curiosity was genuinely piqued.
And so I thought that I might like to have one of those Killer NICS, or one like it, but my Toshiba Satellite laptop clearly has no PCI Express x2 port. It does, however have an express slots, which with my computer's built in NIC and WiFi cards, I have never considered useful.
So the thought occurred to me that a TOE NIC should exist for the express port, but that would be redundant with the Wireless card it already has, and although I don't know much about the Express Port's bus, doesn't seem like it would provide any significant gain in performance.
Then it occurred to me; there is a notebook DIMM slot.
That's what lead me to the following idea - an expansion device that consists of a Wifi card complete with the TOE architecture for de-obfuscating wireless internet communications, the constant bandwidth consuming synch's, ack's, DNS address resolution frames, etc. etc. that then mates directly with the memory expansion DIMM.
In other words, when my CPU access memory 0xFFFFFF or whatever, which is in the Laptop's expansion DIMM slot, it is literally accessing raw memmory written there by the WiFi transceiver, consisting of the content of web pages that have been requested, and neatly and very efficiently stripped of all the unnecessary (at this stage) TCP/IP and 802.11x garbage. To send frames, the CPU simply WRITES to the memory block.
Isn't it brilliant!
What does everyone else think? What caveats do you foresee?
Thanks everyone, I find this proposition tantalizing.
-The Scientist
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
