|
|
I had never heard of CDaoDatabase, however this seem to indicate there are plenty of resources out there to research try.
clickety[^]
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I am pretty new to using MS Access data base and its connectivity.I have a webpage which is made up of HTML.This webpage has some fields in it.I have developed this webpage using Dreamweaver MX technology.
As soon as the users type the information and submit the values,I have designed the webpage to be in such a manner that the information is sent to my email.
Now I am trying to develop a way ,where the user values are stored in my MS Access database.Can anyone help me out in this regard.
What actually needs to be done.How can I establish the connectivity.I am pretty much confused as to what connection strings I should use.Should I change the HTML page to .aspx page????Kindly let me know in detail.Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Vamsee.
|
|
|
|
|
You are posting in the wrong Forum, you should have used ASP.NET Forum, but now to answer your question you have to write a data layer class that will interact with your page and create a Stored Procedure for insert. So that means when a user clicks Submit the data layer wil take the Parameters passed in your form and pass it in the Stored procedure and your records will be in the Database. like at this article and it can be done in Web too
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/NTier.aspx[^]
Vuyiswa Maseko,
Sorrow is Better than Laughter, it may Sadden your Face, but It sharpens your Understanding
VB.NET/SQL7/2000/2005
http://vuyiswamb.007ihost.com
http://Ecadre.007ihost.com
vuyiswam@tshwane.gov.za
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry,
That I have posted in the wrong Place.Your explanation was very good.I will try this and get back to you if I have any doubts.Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Your are welcome, am glad i helped. 
Vuyiswa Maseko,
Sorrow is Better than Laughter, it may Sadden your Face, but It sharpens your Understanding
VB.NET/SQL7/2000/2005
http://vuyiswamb.007ihost.com
http://Ecadre.007ihost.com
vuyiswam@tshwane.gov.za
|
|
|
|
|
hi vamseeraja,
why don´t you became pretty new using SQL Server database, and by the way, became also pretty new using aspx too, instead of html!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Ya I can do that...
But the client I work for are not Computer geeks.so my Boss who also works along with me wants it to be simple technology.So I thought that.Also she wants the database to be in MS Access.
Thanks a lot for suggesting me.
|
|
|
|
|
Good Evening All
I undestand that if i write a Select into statement like this
SELECT * INTO NEW_TABLE FROM OLD_TABLE
This will create a table named New_Table and Copy the Data from the Old table to the New table. Now Every time this kind of statement runs , there should not be a table like New_TABLE? am i right?, am asking this because i have a process that is misbehaving written by a previous developer, if am wrong i think he thought that Select into statement Appends the records if the table New_Table is found.
i just need Clarity
Thanks
Vuyiswa Maseko,
Sorrow is Better than Laughter, it may Sadden your Face, but It sharpens your Understanding
VB.NET/SQL7/2000/2005
http://vuyiswamb.007ihost.com
http://Ecadre.007ihost.com
vuyiswam@tshwane.gov.za
|
|
|
|
|
First: what database is this associated with? Different systems will have different SQL syntax.
|
|
|
|
|
I dont Understand your Question. Am talking about SQL
Vuyiswa Maseko,
Sorrow is Better than Laughter, it may Sadden your Face, but It sharpens your Understanding
VB.NET/SQL7/2000/2005
http://vuyiswamb.007ihost.com
http://Ecadre.007ihost.com
vuyiswam@tshwane.gov.za
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct, Select Into syntax does not append.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you , i understand
Vuyiswa Maseko,
Sorrow is Better than Laughter, it may Sadden your Face, but It sharpens your Understanding
VB.NET/SQL7/2000/2005
http://vuyiswamb.007ihost.com
http://Ecadre.007ihost.com
vuyiswam@tshwane.gov.za
|
|
|
|
|
..and it locks the system tables such as syscolumns for the duration of the select, potentially locking out other users - use with care. I prefer
Select * into New_Table from Old_Table where 1 = 2
insert into New_table select * from Old_Table
as this greatly reduces the lock time.
If necessary you could check for the existence of the new table before doing the select into and drop it if required.
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
I am an e-commerce website. I don't know how to architect the database and I am hoping for some input. The database has not been done yet.
I have 2 web solutions (2 different .net projects). The code is exactly the same. I have one website hosted in Country A for Country A, and I have the other website hosted in Country B only for country B. Reason for this is I want faster download rates.
Ideally I would like to have 2 seperate databases, one for Country A and the other for Country B, so this means that I will have to add the products twice. Some products only display in Country A and some products only display in Country B. I was thinking of having a master database that contains the products and then some how "get" the products to Country A and to Country B so that doanload rates are quicker. I want my users to be able to use both websites, so they can login in on any of the websites.
I hope I am making sense?? If you have any interesting articles please let me know.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
If you structure the tables correctly, you will be able to contain it in a single database.
Use a single user/login table(s) for both sites, this way you wont have to import anything if you kept the site's databases different.
If product's are a one to one relationship to countries (one product can be sold in one county), then you can have a product data set with a column for the country ID. Have a table with the countries (A and B in your example), then join the products and country.
If one product can belong to both countries, then you can have a product table with country "flags" (a bit column with 1 indicating yes and 0 indicating no). So you might have productid = 1, country A = 1, and country B = 1 meaning that the product is available in both countries. If you do expand, then you will have to keep adding countries. To avoid that, you can have a "mapping" table where you map single products to multiple countries (being a true one to many build).
I'm assuming that both sites will use a common database server.
|
|
|
|
|
I will be using SQL Server 2005. I can host the database in Country A, but then downloads times for Country B will be slower? A couple of seconds is big deal for me.
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Enthusiast wrote: I am an e-commerce website.
Oh wow! Do I see Artificial Intelligence? A website posting question in a forum to re-program itself???
All developers have just been made redundant 
I'm way behind in technology. Maybe it's time to retire. 
As for your problem,
Have you looked into replication. If you have a good internet link between your two databases, replication will be almost instantaneous for tables with small volume of changes.
SG
Cause is effect concealed. Effect is cause revealed.
|
|
|
|
|
i was undergoing a problem with a task given to me the task is acess database and bind to the datagrid using c# in ado.net ihave the whole code with write logic but while displaying i am not unable to display dataset on the datagrid.well i am geting the dataset while debuging while applying "add watch" but unable to get it on the datagrid can u plz help me out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
the code bellow works just fine but as you can see it´s a mess.
I don´t like to code "or" so many times.
I know the syntax in c# for array and loops but i can´t find anything of that in sql server.
I am thinking of looping it or make an array but...
declare @racer1 as varchar(50)
declare @racer2 as varchar(50)
declare @racer3 as varchar(50)
declare @racer4 as varchar(50)
declare @racer5 as varchar(50)
declare @racer6 as varchar(50)
declare @racer7 as varchar(50)
declare @racer8 as varchar(50)
set @racer1 = 'Piquet'
set @racer2 = 'Alonso'
set @racer3 = 'Massa'
set @racer4 = 'Heidfeld'
set @racer5 = 'Hamilton'
set @racer6 = 'Kovalainen'
set @racer7 = 'Raikonen'
set @racer8 = 'Trulli'
if @racer1 = @racer2 or @racer1 = @racer3 or @racer1 = @racer4
or @racer1 = @racer5 or @racer1 = @racer6 or @racer1 = @racer7
or @racer1 = @racer8 or @racer2 = @racer3 or @racer2 = @racer4
or @racer2 = @racer5 or @racer2 = @racer6 or @racer2 = @racer7
or @racer2 = @racer8 or @racer3 = @racer4 or @racer3 = @racer5
or @racer3 = @racer6 or @racer3 = @racer7 or @racer3 = @racer8
or @racer4 = @racer5 or @racer4 = @racer6 or @racer4 = @racer7
or @racer4 = @racer8 or @racer5 = @racer6 or @racer5 = @racer7
or @racer5 = @racer8 or @racer6 = @racer7 or @racer6 = @racer8
or @racer7 = @racer8
begin
declare @msgError as varchar(50)
set @msgError = 'Error: Same racer name'
select @msgError
end
else
begin
declare @msgOK as varchar(50)
set @msgOK = 'OK: Diferent racer'
select @msgOK
end
What do you think? 
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone has a Split function right! If you don't the why not!
<br />
DECLARE @racer1 VARCHAR(1000)<br />
set @racer1 = 'Piquet,Alonso,Massa,Heidfeld,Piquet,Hamilton,Kovalainen,Piquet,Raikonen,Trulli'<br />
<br />
SELECT Item, COUNT(*) Dupes<br />
FROM dbo.fn_Split(@racer1, ',')<br />
GROUP BY Item<br />
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Try this method
Declare @tblRacer as table(Racer varchar(50))
insert into @tblRacer(Racer)
select 'Piquet'
union all select 'Alonso'
union all select 'Massa'
union all select 'Heidfeld'
union all select 'Hamilton'
union all select 'Kovalainen'
union all select 'Raikonen'
union all select 'Trulli'
union all select 'Trulli'
if ((select count(Racer) from @tblRacer group by Racer having count(Racer) > 1) > 1)
begin
declare @msgError as varchar(50)
set @msgError = 'Error: Same racer name'
select @msgError
end
else
begin
declare @msgOK as varchar(50)
set @msgOK = 'OK: Diferent racer'
select @msgOK
end
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for the posts i am going to see what i make from it 
about hamilton i really don´t care!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could help me with something SQL related. I'm trying to create a table that has the following granularity:
Client
Unit
Month
Year
I then want a few calculations at that granularity. The calculations are:
Amount
Sales
Costs
Amount is just a straight sum of the amount field in the existing table.
But to determine sales and costs I need to evaluate based on a n_code. So when the n_codes is > 5000 then Costs = sum(amount). When the n_codes is between 4000 and 4999 then Sales = sum(amount).
I do not want the n_codes in my output.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
