|
Niladri_Biswas wrote: Note- I sql server 2008, for solving this kind of problem you can take the advantage of Hierarchial Id's
Can 2008 use this format as a hierarchyID, there us no delimiter for the levels, the standard HID.ToString() looks like '/G12/1/'
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Kindly let me know how may I convert following Oracle sql into MS-Access ?
SELECT A.SNO, A.CODE, A.QTY, A.RATE, B.NAME
FROM DETAIL A, MASTER B
WHERE A.CODE=B.CODE(+)
thanx in advance
|
|
|
|
|
This should wok, I'm not sure what the significance of (+) is in the join
SELECT A.SNO, A.CODE, A.QTY, A.RATE, B.NAME
FROM DETAIL A
INNER JOIN MASTER B ON A.CODE=B.CODE
|
|
|
|
|
The (+) makes it an outer join.
|
|
|
|
|
M Riaz Bashir wrote: Kindly let me know how may I convert following Oracle sql into MS-Access ?
Why, would anyone ever move from oracle to access?
Anyway, here goes.
SELECT A.SNO, A.CODE, A.QTY, A.RATE, B.NAME
FROM DETAIL A RIGHT JOIN MASTER B
WHERE A.CODE=B.CODE
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a left join, not a right join. I'm not an Oracle expert but I have a feeling the (+) goes on the side of the join which is not required (not sure of the technical term for that). In other words
a.code = b.code(+) is a left outer join and
a.code(+) = b.code is a right outer join.
I'm not 100% sure about that so don't take my word for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Damn!
I need a coffee. Or actually rather a beer. Or both.
|
|
|
|
|
a.code = b.code(+) The (+) says any a.code value will match a NULL b.code value. Meaning you get all the a.code values.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have written a stored procedure where i am taking the select query into a variable @string and executing the query.
i am generating the query dynamically based on the SP inputs. If the query is below 4000 chars , there is no prob with it. If it exceeds then query is not executing. Kindly help....
Thanks in advance
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
If I'm right you will not be able to query/search for data/text that is larger than 4000 chars.
All column types above text(4000), like NVarChar(max) can't be a query parameter.
I hope somebody can confirm that.
Greetings
Covean
|
|
|
|
|
Hi thanks for the reply..... just did a small change by declaring as varchar(MAX) and its accepting more than 4000. Thank you
Regards
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
No problem and thank you for confirming that I'm wrong.
And good to know. 
Greetings
Covean
|
|
|
|
|
You may be limited to 8000 character, the max of varchar, not sure if varchar(max) overcomes this limitation.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
if i give nvarchar(8000) it says that i have crosses the linit of 4000 characters. i am using sqlserver 2005. and now i noticed that varchar(MAX) is taking only 4000 characters.
Regards
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
use varchar(8000)
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
i declared as varchar(8000) and assigned a query to it.
but when i tried to print the length and string, it shows only till 4000 chars and the length also its showing only 4000. 
Regards
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
use nvarchar(8000)
umesh
|
|
|
|
|
The size (8000) given to the parameter '@sql' exceeds the maximum allowed (4000). is the error if i use nvarchar(8000)
Regards
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
Yes... Hightest value of NVARCHAR is 4000 and VARCHAR is 8000
BUT NVARCHAR takes large CHARSET.. So use NVARCHAR only when you need. 
|
|
|
|
|
I finally got the answere.....
I declared @string as varchar(8000). But there are nvarchars declared which i am assigning to @string which finally lead to the problem . because of this @string is taking only 4000 charecters, I replaced all nvarchars with varchars and finally its taking morethan 4000 charecters.
Regards
Naina
Naina
|
|
|
|
|
Take @string as varchar(max) and then try executing it
Hope it helps!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am struggling to get the week number and week day of the particular day. I know we can use Datepart function which is available in sql server 2008 to display the week number of the given date. but my situation is different. for example
Datepart(wk,'2009-12-30') gives 53 weeks
Datepart(wk,'2010-01-02') gives 1. but I wanted to display it as 54.
whenever the year is changing I need to add these week number to the previous year one.
In the below table Bugdate is the input, and weeknumber and startday of the week are the expected outputs.
BugDate ----- weeknumber ---- Startday of the Week
....
12/13/2008---- 50------------- 12/7/2008
12/14/2008---- 51------------- 12/14/2008
12/21/2008---- 52------------- 12/21/2008
12/23/2008---- 52------------- 12/21/2008
12/30/2008---- 53------------- 12/28/2008
1/2/2009------- 54------------- 12/28/2008
1/6/2009------- 55------------- 1/4/2009
...
12/20/2009---- 105------------ 12/20/2009
12/28/2009---- 106------------ 12/27/2009
1/1/2010------ 106------------ 12/27/2009
Can any one help me to solve this problem.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
You could do something like
Select Datepart(wk,'2010-01-02') + ((Datepart(yr,'2010-01-02') - 2009) * 52
OR get the datediff days / 7 and use floor or ceiling to get the number you want (this is more reliable as the week numbers per year do not change.
This is a fairly simple exercise of thinking around corners, you are not flexing you brain enough.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for your reply to get the week number. But how to get the first day of the week for the given date?
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Read up on datepart in BOL, there is a dayofweek element that will tell you.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
