|
gone
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also has a "question" with the same link: Member questions & answers[^]
The <pre> block with the words "Java Hadoop" is a link.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: offerdunia - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: i want to change my website[^] (already deleted)
Quote: i would like to make my coupons website more attractive how to do that ???
Where the word "coupons" was a link to a site with the same name as the user.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Thanks
Happy Coding 
|
|
|
|
|
This: Blazor : Run C# On Browser[^]
From this: Mangesh Gaherwar - Professional Profile[^]
He lists two references at the bottom, but everything in the whole article (except the pictures) is the text from the two articles with the English mangled and broken. The ordering if items is the same, most of the words in each sentence is the same.
I'm not happy to let this go myself - your thoughts folks?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 26-Apr-18 10:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
I will go for plagiarism.
It is clearly a rewrite of the mentioned references. It is not stated which parts are from which reference.
I would not report an article for plagiarism for improper indication when references are given (a case for a comment to give the author the chance to correct it).
But here we have "Not Enough Original Content" (in fact no original content; even the screen shots are re-created).
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see anything spammy.
Or have I missed something (Monday morning)?
|
|
|
|
|
It looked like advertising to me. But I am happy to leave it.
|
|
|
|
|
It indeed looks so.
But then you would have to treat also articles as spam which - for example - praise Visual Studio and provide a link the VS main page.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
