|
Spammer: chitranjan singh rathore - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
You can't get to the messages, because the article they were posted to has been deleted. But you can see the title, which contains the payload.
There was also an answer to a very old question in QA with the same site-driving link, but mine was the third report on that, so it's gone now.
He also has one question, but that doesn't seem to contain any spam.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
A user is posting answers to old questions, even when the answer is already accepted and asked not to.
ref: Member questions & answers[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry... I thought to post a link to his answers would do ... will do correctly next time 
|
|
|
|
|
Nah. Once the answers have gone - and they only need 5 votes - there is no easy way to get back to the member - and he needs more kicks than an answer does.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Three votes, actually. Messages and articles / tips need 5. Members need 10.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
A "this one got through" message lead me to this article: Software Design Principles[^]
From this: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi - Professional Profile[^]
And there are two messages below the spam post which accuse the author of plagiarising this tip from here: Design Principles | Object Oriented Design[^]
The problem is that I can't see any date on the "source" article, but it does look a lot more "Polished" and lacks the grammatical errors in the version here, and adds a references link which kinda leans me towards the "that is the original document" feeling. It also links to other parts of the same site which explain the summary sections in much better detail, and which share a "voice style" with the header document, which the tip here lacks.
On balance, I'm prepared to run with "Plagiarised" and "Plagiarist" on this one.
Your thoughts, folks?
[edit]See Richard's post below[/edit]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 27-Jul-17 7:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And question mark removed. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
