|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both the article and the member are gone.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 24-Apr-16 5:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems you do not understand and acknowledge plagiarism as described here: CodeProject Plagiarism FAQ[^]
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Never post your email address in any forum, unless you really like spam! If anyone replies to you, you will receive an email to let you know.
I have removed your email from your post: which is rather more courtesy than you showed when you decided that copyright rules don't apply to you...
We do not tolerate plagiarism - and thank you for indicating your second account. I'm sure that will not last long either...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 24-Apr-16 5:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
The article is gone: and so is your account.
As I said: we do not appreciate plagiarism. The rule is simple: you steal, your account is forfeit. The accounts of plagiarists are not reactivated. You have been here more than long enough to know and understand this.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How can I tell you that its not a copy man. Just look at the content and references, they more than enough. And if its a copy instead of banning account you guys should help author to make it correct or to provide references link. Or you should just close article permanently not the account. And if you have banned the account please close my old article related to kafka also as it is still available. Because i need a place where moderators will help not blame. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
We tried that.
We warned people.
We let them come back when they said "I'm sorry, I didn't know, I won't do it again".
And guess what?
They did it again. And generally, they just tried to be "cleverer" and hide it. But we're pretty damn good at spotting plagiarism now - we've had a lot of practice - and there isn't a lot that gets past us. And what does, is generally spotted even after publication.
So the rules changed: no second chances. You knew what you were doing: we know what you did. Your account is gone.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please tell me from where I copied. Is there a match. Cat spells cat always. I cant change. So build of hadoop will also have same steps. How can I change it. All images used are snapshot of my own pc. Text is written by me except of 5 wiki lines. That too link is in references. What should I have been changed. Tell me.
|
|
|
|
|
You are running away from your responsibility by banning account instead of helping people to make it correct. Coz yeah... Click deactivate button... Less effort... Easy.... Right??
|
|
|
|
|
No, not at all.
It's harder to stop people plagiarising than it is to help them. Mostly because very few of them see that they have done anything wrong and that's a really, really difficult thing to teach people. It's called "ethics" or "morals" and the world's religions have been trying to instil a sense of them for thousands of years. Unsuccessfully, I should add.
But pointing out the stolen parts and saying "remove those" or "change these" to avoid the actual author noticing and being (rightfully) upset is trivial!
When you copy someone else's words and say "I wrote this" that's theft. No arguments are really possible - someone put a lot of effort into getting the words right and all the thief did was highlight it, copy it, paste it into a new document and "tweek" it. And moderators are authors; we all know how much work it is to write the words an article demands. Personally, I can write the code for an article in an afternoon, maybe less. But the word will take me a month, on and off - maybe a 1:30 work ratio. That's a big investment in time and effort, and that costs money - I could spend my time getting paid for a month's work at my normal hourly rate instead!
So when somebody thinks the equivalent of "sod it, I can't be bothered - I'll use what he wrote instead" we think "**** you, sunshine, and the horse you rode in on".
End of conversation.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the lecture, It seems like you are a social writer more than a technical. Also it seems like here we have no sense of differentiating a original article with a copy paste one, also I think here people does not believe in improving things & for your information mine is not a copy paste because I have spent around 50 hrs or about 8-10 days before writing it here.
I tested it again & again, tested my steps about 5 time on different machines, prepared a video, edited it.
I can not change steps involved in building hadoop but I can write a improved article, & that's what I did But here I ended with this blame.
Better you check references by your own, if you know what references mean.
And if possible please do not write 100 words about this world what you just did instead write how we can make it better.
Real End Of Conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
I've found at least two sentences which you copied from other people's work (after which I stopped looking for more). While two sentences aren't many it already refutes your statement of original authorship, destroys your reputation and makes me expect that there's more copy&paste.
From Hadoop2OnWindows - Hadoop Wiki[^]:
Quote: Hadoop version 2.2 onwards includes native support for Windows. The official Apache Hadoop releases do not include Windows binaries (yet, as of January 2014).
Your introduction:
Quote: Hadoop version 2.2 onwards includes native support for Windows, but the official Apache Hadoop releases do not include Windows binaries
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Ya and if you know what references mean then may be you should have not written that.
Everyone uses wiki descriptions also its not sufficient for blocking any article.
You can find such sentences in almost every article. Try on one of your.
Isn't your quote "If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson" seems copied and just by writing "Lyall Watson" you mean you have all access.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a Plagiarism FAQ on the article submission page. It is in bold to attract your attention to it. I have also emailed it to you. Pointing a finger at someone else doesn't mean you didn't plagiarize and the people in this forum put a lot of time and effort looking for plagiarism so please don't belittle their efforts.
We have explained our position on this matter. It is not a debate. Please look at the FAQ we provided you, try to learn from your mistake, and cease this back and forth. If you choose to continue arguing about this rather than letting it go and learning from it, then we simply want different things for this community and you will be removed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I know what he wrote? Have defended him in the past and agree he was doing well this time.
|
|
|
|
|
I've slept since then! 
Something about homosexuality and Islam...I don't bother to try and remember his twaddle 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
