Spam and Abuse Watch

13-Jan-16 9:01

Dave Kreskowiak

13-Jan-16 9:01

Message Removed

modified 13-Jan-16 16:52pm.

13-Jan-16 9:07

13-Jan-16 9:07

Message Removed

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

13-Jan-16 9:19

13-Jan-16 9:19

Message Removed

modified 13-Jan-16 16:52pm.

13-Jan-16 9:24

Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

13-Jan-16 9:24

Message Removed

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

AshishShukla613-Jan-16 7:16

AshishShukla6

13-Jan-16 7:16

Today I have posted an article Top 20 Twitter Bootstrap Interview questions[^] on Code Project. I want to know why it is closed after 10 to 12 hour of activation. Please provide the reason for same.

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

Pete O'Hanlon13-Jan-16 7:43

Pete O'Hanlon

13-Jan-16 7:43

Well, following your post here I went to the article, copied out one sentence and plugged it into Google. The first sentence I copied out was plagiarised and taken from Mostly fluid pattern[^]. Shall I continue searching and see where else these questions came from?

This space for rent

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

Sascha Lefèvre13-Jan-16 7:53

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

13-Jan-16 7:53

That's actually his own website - so no plagiarism but instead site driving, which is what OriginalGriff reported him for here: Spam would be article - got through. - CodeProject[^]

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

Dave Kreskowiak13-Jan-16 8:49

Dave Kreskowiak

13-Jan-16 8:49

Plagiarism, site driving, whatever...

Personally, I find the entire notion of a list of "Interview questions" utterly useless and disrespectful to those who actually know what they're doing and don't need such a list.

If you KNOW the material inside and out, you don't need such a list. If you don't know the material and just parrot back a predefined answer, such as those you give your list, you don't deserve the job at all.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

Click this: Asking questions is a skill.
Seriously, do it.

Dave Kreskowiak

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

User 5924113-Jan-16 16:02

User 59241

13-Jan-16 16:02

I agree with you entirely.

Peter Wasser

"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

Pete O'Hanlon13-Jan-16 21:14

Pete O'Hanlon

13-Jan-16 21:14

The choir here has your back on this.

This space for rent

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

den2k8813-Jan-16 22:39

den2k88

13-Jan-16 22:39

I'd found them useful - if I were the one asking the questions $Shucks | :-\$

GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver

"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey

"just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

Nelek13-Jan-16 22:58

Re: Request to provide reason why article is marked as closed

13-Jan-16 22:58

Just to know what to avoid to sort out the wanna be's

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Nelek13-Jan-16 23:02

13-Jan-16 23:02

That's why in case of not site driving and not plagiarized, I still report them as "Innacurate / Misleading".

To learn something by heart to vomit out predefined answers is not a good practice and IMHO that is to mislead the newbies.

M.D.V.

Yet more hidden Spammers

Sascha Lefèvre13-Jan-16 3:58

13-Jan-16 3:58

In cases where it's not obvious why I reported them, take a look at their homepage-link.

Katielur[^]
quiquedunlo1971[^]
hobepoli1980[^]

Member 12259632[^]
tyascc[^]
Lilykkr[^]

cwfgm61[^]
Mercedelsy[^]
Eddielka[^]

lifschitz1398[^]
eayewc[^]

I'm pretty sure I could report a bunch of hidden spammers a day for months. Should I do it?

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

OriginalGriff13-Jan-16 5:00

OriginalGriff

13-Jan-16 5:00

Yes - go for it. Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

We may as well clear the scum outta here!

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

User 1106097913-Jan-16 11:06

13-Jan-16 11:06

Thank you for your help on delete the "other" one.
Bruno

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

User 1106097913-Jan-16 5:57

13-Jan-16 5:57

All on 7/8. Final destination recognizable.

modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.

den2k8813-Jan-16 20:55

den2k88

13-Jan-16 20:55

All kicked out. As many know, I enjoy hunting and striking down spammers. Good job! Thumbs Up | :thumbsup:

all gone

Nelek13-Jan-16 22:59

Plagiarised would be article [It got through] [and back in the queue again] -- member gone

13-Jan-16 22:59

all gone

M.D.V.

OriginalGriff13-Jan-16 0:39

OriginalGriff

13-Jan-16 0:39

This: ~~Big Data Analysis (part-1: ETL) - CodeProject[^]~~
Big Data Analysis (part-1: ETL)[^]
Back in the queue: Big Data Analysis (part-1: ETL) - CodeProject[^]
From this: Humayun Rashed - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Contains copy'n'paste from here: ETL (Extract-Transform-Load) | Data Integration Info[^]

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

modified 13-Jan-16 8:16am.

Re: Plagiarised would be article

Sascha Lefèvre13-Jan-16 0:44

Re: Plagiarised would be article

13-Jan-16 0:44

Beat me to it.

He also copied from here: Fact table - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[^]
and here: Data Warehouse Schema Architecture - star schema[^]

If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson

OriginalGriff13-Jan-16 0:48

OriginalGriff

13-Jan-16 0:48

Just another pond scum... Sigh | :sigh:

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Re: Plagiarised would be article - accepted

Jochen Arndt13-Jan-16 1:18

Jochen Arndt

13-Jan-16 1:18

Article has been accepted.
Please report again (link is still working).

Once again a suspect article has been approved. I did not detect the plagiarism (it seems I fed the wrong sentences to Google) but that all images have no copyright / attribution. Even therefore it should have never been accepted.

Re: Plagiarised would be article [It got through] [and back in the queue again]

Richard Deeming13-Jan-16 1:54

Richard Deeming

13-Jan-16 1:54

Article gone (for now); member on 9.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

... And back again

Nelek13-Jan-16 3:00