|
To tell people on a case by case basis, would be, I guess very time consuming.
To tell everybody, would be defeating the object, as you are then educating the Spammers.
Tim Carmichael wrote: If there are certain words I should avoid, I'll try to do so, but without knowing, it's hard to adjust behaviour.
That's the point you shouldn't adjust your behaviour, the filter should learn what normal messages are. The word/words you used were incorrectly flagged as potential Spam indicators. It's this flagging that has been fixed - so you should be able to use these words now.
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't adjust your posting behaviour. The whole point of the spam system is that we teach it what we feel is acceptable and what is not. Post as you will, and if it gets trapped then after it's marked "good" the system will learn and should not bother you again. If it again gets all weird on you then it's time to give it another lesson.
It works for us; we don't work for it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you both... it was just odd because I had never had anything marked as spam before.
|
|
|
|
|
For Message Moderation the Message Replied To column contains links to the parent messages. I've turned this into a button to make it more obvious.
I'll look at doing something similar for Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
Done and waiting for deploy.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't it make sense to bypass the spam filter for messages from members with a certain minimum reputation?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Nope.
As discussed before: spam, sadly, can come from all directions.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The only thing I could think of might be to not Filter Spam in this Forum as it is likely that posters might be quoting a spam message.
But I am waiting until it becomes an issue, as the Filter might actually figure this out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
elephant headshot
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
modified 22-Jun-15 6:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removed the post as it's off topic and clear case of setup. Let's go..!
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone!
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=173720&aid=1002664[^]
From this: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/elden_nie[^]
Apart from being a load of rubbish as an article, it's heavily influenced by this lecture: http://see.stanford.edu/materials/aimlcs229/transcripts/MachineLearning-Lecture01.pdf[^]
Our guy:
"giving the algorothm the,quote,right answer, and then we want the algorithm to learn the association between the inputs and the outputs. and to sort of give us more of the right answer"
Stanford Lecture:
" giving the algorithm the, quote, right answer for a number of houses. And
then we want the algorithm to learn the association between the inputs and the outputs
and to sort of give us more of the right answers, okay?"
Our Guy:
"In reforcement learning problems,you are asked to make a sequence of decisions over time."
Stanford Lecture:
"In reinforcement learning problems, you are usually asked to make a sequence of
decisions over time."
Looks to me like he just typed out the bits he liked, and tried to "hide" the origin.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|