Spam and Abuse Watch

FirstPrevNext

Gone Cornelius Henning3-Jun-15 9:06 Cornelius Henning 3-Jun-15 9:06  Gone! How do we preserve the wisdom men will need, when their violent passions are spent? - The Lost Horizon Gone: Illegal Article Sascha Lefèvre3-Jun-15 6:18 Sascha Lefèvre 3-Jun-15 6:18  I was a bit too quick with my "Gone"-message for the article-report below[^]. An older version is still in the moderation queue: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=171949&aid=996297[^] If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson modified 3-Jun-15 13:39pm. Re: Gone: Illegal Article CHill603-Jun-15 12:44 CHill60 3-Jun-15 12:44  Persistant I'll give them that. However, that version of the article is now also closed Plagiarised would be article. OriginalGriff3-Jun-15 6:00 OriginalGriff 3-Jun-15 6:00  This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=172003&aid=997521[^] Reposted: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=172005&aid=997521[^] From this: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10616504[^] All the text is copied from - well, take your pick, really: Google[^] And if you take that out, what's left is basically the MSDN examples only without the using blocks... Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... Re: Plagiarised would be article. CHill603-Jun-15 6:06 CHill60 3-Jun-15 6:06  That name rings a bell. One to keep an eye on. Gone Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov3-Jun-15 16:43 Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 3-Jun-15 16:43  Right. I also remember something very unpleasant about this member. But by my last vote the account has gone. —SA Sergey A Kryukov Abusive back again, I suspect OriginalGriff3-Jun-15 0:51 OriginalGriff 3-Jun-15 0:51  This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Messages.aspx?fmid=11738426[^] Posting random keyboard rubbish in teh lounge: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5068658/fhg-fgh-fgh-fgh-fgh-fgh-fgh-f.aspx[^] Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... Re: Abusive back again, I suspect Richard Deeming3-Jun-15 0:55 Richard Deeming 3-Jun-15 0:55  You forgot the link to the member. http://www.codeproject.com/Members/srina420[^] "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer Re: Abusive back again, I suspect OriginalGriff3-Jun-15 1:16 OriginalGriff 3-Jun-15 1:16  It's the Alzheimer's... Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... Re: Abusive back again, I suspect Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter3-Jun-15 1:32 Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter 3-Jun-15 1:32  He's ain't home... Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape. Re: Abusive back again, I suspect Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter3-Jun-15 1:33 Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter 3-Jun-15 1:33  How pretty, I had a good time with that message (abusive, but good)... Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape. Gone Sascha Lefèvre3-Jun-15 3:20 Sascha Lefèvre 3-Jun-15 3:20  Gone If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson Abusive Marco Bertschi3-Jun-15 0:19 Marco Bertschi 3-Jun-15 0:19  This[^] Gentleman. Abusive and Foul language towards others. I already deleted the messages, but need some help with the account. "A property doesn't have to be a Property to be a property." - PIEBALDConsult Re: Abusive [Gone] Tom Deketelaere3-Jun-15 0:40 Tom Deketelaere 3-Jun-15 0:40  He is no more Tom [Request] Please remove this comment. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat3-Jun-15 0:04 Sandeep Singh Shekhawat 3-Jun-15 0:04  ASP.NET MVC Client Side Validation[^] modified 15-Jun-15 11:58am. [Request granted] Marco Bertschi3-Jun-15 0:21 Marco Bertschi 3-Jun-15 0:21  Message removed. He had a few other comments going with the same scheme on other articles, so I reported him[^]. Happy Slapping! "A property doesn't have to be a Property to be a property." - PIEBALDConsult Re: [Request granted] Sandeep Singh Shekhawat3-Jun-15 0:48 Sandeep Singh Shekhawat 3-Jun-15 0:48  Thanks a lot. you did it promptly. Possible spam set up CHill603-Jun-15 0:03 CHill60 3-Jun-15 0:03  In QA Please Suggest ,to buy best configuration for Sever, we have big ASP.NET web application with very large database,and have very big traffic on every on our site.[^] Keeping an eye on it waiting for the hit Re: Possible spam set up Marco Bertschi3-Jun-15 0:22 Marco Bertschi 3-Jun-15 0:22  Well, the question is gone for good. "A property doesn't have to be a Property to be a property." - PIEBALDConsult Site-driving Spam Richard Deeming2-Jun-15 22:36 Richard Deeming 2-Jun-15 22:36  Spammer: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/User-11703234[^] Spam: How to connect data base to ASP .net[^] "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer Gone Sascha Lefèvre3-Jun-15 3:18 Sascha Lefèvre 3-Jun-15 3:18  Gone If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson Illegal article: closed-source under the open source license Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov2-Jun-15 16:45 Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 2-Jun-15 16:45  This one: C# Dock Layout Ranger - (VS.NET Style) - 3.4.0.1[^] by http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10813788[^]. This is a serious violation, the abuse of the obligations assumed by the license. Remember that this is the Microsoft license approved by Open Source Initiative. And it does not look like a random mistake. On my request the author clearly explained that he is going to change the text to the link to the code, that is, not going to publish source code. —SA modified 3-Jun-15 0:27am. Re: Illegal article: closed-source under the open source license Sascha Lefèvre2-Jun-15 18:03 Sascha Lefèvre 2-Jun-15 18:03  Just as additional information on this subject: The DLL that contains the important code behind the article is obfuscated. If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson Obfuscated?! Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov2-Jun-15 18:25 Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 2-Jun-15 18:25  Obfuscated?! Well, very much of the Open Source! I just thought about the possibility to reverse-engineering it. I guess, you tried it out and found obfuscated names, right? Well, it makes the article only more abusive. This is a really serious violation. —SA Sergey A Kryukov Re: Illegal article: closed-source under the open source license CHill602-Jun-15 23:01 CHill60 2-Jun-15 23:01  Version in the link is "not available for viewing" but older version has reappeared in moderation queue http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=171915&aid=996297[^]

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 1-May-24 8:54 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...3048304930503051305230533054305530563057 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.