|
It's actually good you posted that bit. The first time I clicked a link to an abusive article comment that was no longer there I was confused thinking they were trying to report the article.
Good call. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I plagiarized the idea from someone here 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefévre wrote: I think I plagiarized the idea from someone here
In that case, consider yourself reported. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I plead leniency for making a confession 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Messages removed, abuser on 8.
|
|
|
|
|
This article[^] by this user[^].
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headshot
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As no forum really fits, I put it here..)
Sometimes there are articles/blogs in the queue where the description for the moderator says "This is an old version of a previously published article".
What's that about?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
It means the author has updated the article before the old one has been approved, so there's a different version available to approve.
|
|
|
|
|
But should that really be there given that a new version of it has already been approved and available to the public? 
Note: I can't see the moderation queue as of yet. 
I ain't got no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
The old version may be suitable for publication where the new version might not. It's better, then, to approve the one that is fit for purpose, rather than rejecting both.
|
|
|
|
|
Best not to approve anything. 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Pete!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
article closed, spammer gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baboom.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
