|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam mer[^]
while (true) {
continue;
}
modified 18-Aug-15 7:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message has gone, so link now just goes to Lounge itself.
Spammer currently on 9
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This answer[^] from this user[^] (Solution 2) is clearly abusive: once you translate it to english, that gives something like:
biến mẹ mày đi thằng chó đẻ -> turn your mother go straight bitch
đụ con đỉ mẹ mày -> though they are your mother
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Highly abusive. Answer removed.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
They also had one that got through - I've deleted it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Look at this example http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ListVersions.aspx?aid=1017398[^]
Between revisions 12 to 31 there are no changes in the article at all. So I believe the purpose is solely to keep the article on the front page.
That together with the begging for votes in the comments section is giving a bit of a bad taste.
Oh, please don't simply report, I want a discussion on where it goes from silly behaviour to actual abuse.
|
|
|
|
|
The vote requests aren't to my taste - but I find it tacky in QA as well - but that's not abuse.
The edits are edging there, but I don't think that counts as actual abuse either, it's just "gaming the system" without any real reward.
Perhaps a quiet word is the best policy? It's not a bad article, after all!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|