|
|
|
That's fast. can't even look at actual problem, we should archive it as showcase!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Joined today, first post(s), spam setup for online courses: Node666 - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
JOined today, first post, site driving to his "Antivirus app": james2111 - Professional Profile[^]
Would you trust random antivirus software? No? Strange ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Mine was #1... did you forget to click on his flag?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't think so - it may have been a Hamster Problem, I'm still getting SSL_VERSION_INTERFERENCE errors intermittently.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shimak21ves89nede
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
gone
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This article in moderation - Box-shadows Device[^]
Appears to cover more or less the same topic as this published article from the same author: Collection of CSS box-shadow[^]
Both are littered with links to the author's github page - in fact in the latter case, (at least some of) the contents hyperlinks go to the github page rather than to within the article.
Is this site-driving? Should someone have a quiet word? Am I overreacting?
|
|
|
|
|
on the first one being in moderation right now... I just went for "poor"
About the links... I do think there is a lot of external links. I don't know if visitors give any kind of profit in github, but if yes... I would think the same as you and go for site driving.
@Sean-Ewington would you mind to have a look? Bring a bit light to the question?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I also went for "poor." Deleted. Did this yesterday too, along with a message of how to improve. Let's see if there's a third.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean
|
|
|
|