|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Thanks
Happy Coding
|
|
|
|
|
More training Member 14144039 - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 1-Mar-19 16:48pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Messages[^]
I see the profile page message count bug is still haunting us.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 1-Mar-19 16:48pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Thanks
Happy Coding
|
|
|
|
|
Steroids: Member 14145831 - Professional Profile[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 11-Feb-19 4:01am.
|
|
|
|
|
@OriginalGriff did you approved this[^] being in lack of or do you really did it conciously?
I find it extremly interesting and technically more advanced than many things that get published, I would have very probably approved it too.
I am just a bit confused because that looks like a second try and the first one got deleted - CodeProject[^].
Similar kind of publications have been reported before.
@Sean-Ewington or @Chris-Maunder what do you think?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 10-Feb-19 15:13pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That one I thought about for a while, and approved on the grounds that it is indeed an interesting approach, and it's more an "advanced debugging" aid than actual hacking.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Than... should we maybe warn the user to avoid that word and possible missunderstandings?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The word in this context is used correctly. Why should the guy be censored because some choose to assume another meaning: Hacker - Wikipedia[^]
Back when I was reading Dr. Dobb's Journal of Computer Calisthenics & Orthodontia thats what we were all called: Dr. Dobb's Journal - Wikipedia[^]
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: and possible missunderstandings? Those don't depend on the correctness of the context but on the interpretation of the users.
and just in case... (for the ones reading) I AM NOT REPORTING IT.
I already said I find it extreme interesting and more advance as many things that get published. But IMHO it would be worth to consider a bit of edition.
I just want to try to avoid that it get nuked when it is not to be nuked (a version of the article got already deleted) and to clarify the topic before the accusations about "double standards" or similar pop up.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
So your thesis would be if there are ambiguities based on the possibly limited comprehension of the reader then we pasteurize everything to avoid that. That is called political correctness.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|