|
Fresh Spam and member Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message deleted. Member on 7 atm.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I located it on C# Corner, but he wrote it there as well (same author name). I could not find it anywhere else.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
There's a copy of both on his own blog. I won't link to it, because it has a very spammy-looking post from December.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which part of this name (there are two IDs, the title name and the "@wannabeyourm" which is not a display name, but is still visible on the profile page), which part do you consider offensive?
Maybe it's better not to set a negative model of finding everything around offensive? There are well too many members already who tend to play offense card?
Sorry if I missed your point; in that case, please explain.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Look down his list of Comments. He's changed his name a few times. At one point, it was "Your Bitch".
|
|
|
|
|
Ha-ha, yes I saw it earlier today. Then I guess this person tried to rather offend her/himself. Other things are worse.
I just noted for myself that referring this person could be a bit awkward: Your bitch wrote… I mean, not yours… the inquirer wrote…
Today the forums are rich in real freaks (as if spamming and plagiarizing wasn't enough). I recently reported one and a bit earlier OriginalGriff reported another one…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Today the forums are rich in real freaks
That's one way to describe them. They're certainly not developers.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point. The issue is: do we need non-engineers, non-developers here? I thin we don't. The only problem is: who can decide on that? I guess, people can be kicked off only if it becomes quite obvious, in each separate case.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the most of them don't realize that they are just hobbyists, but since they're getting a paycheck to do it they think they're doing it "for real".
|
|
|
|
|
So so and so true… Only I disagree about comparing these people with "hobbists" as offensive to hobby. There is such thing as "real hobby" which is something so much better that "professionalism" of the sort we are talking about, something nearly opposite.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|