|
|
When it was just the one (Ryan) posting that link in the lounge, it was believable.
But two members? Nah - it's spam...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: it was believable
I realy don't believe how gullible you can be.
That URL didn't look anything like it would belong to Microsoft and neither did the content.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't follow the link to anywhere, so I wasn't going to know!
Anyway, what's this word "gullible"? It's not in my dictionary...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Anyway, what's this word "gullible"? It's not in my dictionary
Nice try, I'm not so gullible to actually believe you wouldn't know exactly what that word meant!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
message gone, user needs a few more kicks
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaned the message, user needs a few more kicks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMOVED
modified 22-May-15 9:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
does that qualify as spamming?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Well I would say it does, I see no value in his answers to a 4 year old questions.
I don't believe this is a site driven spam to "guylangston" blog, I just think this is a spam due to fact that he is repeating himself on multiple posts to a again 4 year old questions.
If you disagree let me know and I'll remove this, but can you explain why you think this is not a spam?
To my understanding, and as I have previously seen, posting on very old questions is usually considered a spam (there are very rare occasions when it is not).
|
|
|
|
|
Spam = Advertising. There is no ad, so no spam. It should not be reported as its totally relavant in context of the question.
Further, answering n-year old question is totally fine given it helps some one facing the issue mentioned in the question.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|