|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDIT by Nelek: Nothing to see here (but Sean's answer below), move on, move on...
Sean PT - https://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=15600406
Member questions & answers
However, this one:
a) openly states that it was generated by ChatGPT; and
b) is an answer to a no-code homework question.
So I'm not sure whether that deserves a kicking for the user. Any thoughts?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 9-Feb-23 2:25am.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: So I'm not sure whether that deserves a kicking for the user. Any thoughts?
As the source of the solution is given, I don't see it as a problem. It is no different from pointing to StackOverflow or Blog posts.
I have an issue when ChatGPT answers are claimed as their own work. This is plagiarism, no different from claiming someone else's answer from StackOverflow or a blog post as their own.
However, helping someone with their homework is a concern. If they use it for their homework and learn nothing, they're only hurting themselves.
What I try to do, most of the time is teaching members how to research their answers, and give them the skill to help them learn and grow.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Please leave this guy alone. He is an integrator for CodeProject.AI Server.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe there should be some way of indicating that sort of thing in the profile? But obviously something that can't be faked by the user.
Also, is there an official policy yet on using GPT to generate answers?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Funny you should say that because we are working on making them more identifiable.
I'm still trying to figure out how we could conclusively determine someone was using GPT to generate answers.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I'm still trying to figure out how we could conclusively determine someone was using GPT to generate answers.
Assuming this tool[^] wouldn't work?
Obviously at the moment it's a judgement call. But doesn't it makes sense to have a formal policy in place that we can point to? Otherwise, we risk either deleting answers which are actually acceptable, or getting complaints from users who "didn't realise" that their behaviour was against the policy, because there is no policy.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|