|
I had a very big doubt regarding the windows search api which im trying to implement in my search engine.I want to use windows serach api - Advanced Query Syntax to search a particular search criteria in sql server dtabase.Since Isearch manager classs of WDS API needs index to be specified ; when i give my table index it throws an exception "Error HRESULT E_FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component".
It would be great if smebody guide me thru this or atleast sum pointers.I have been really stucked up past 5 days with this.Please mail me the code snippet for the same.
My mail id is online.shraddha@gmail.com 
|
|
|
|
|
You've been wasting your time for 5 days because Windows Search doesn't work with SQL databases. Where di you find documentation that says it works with SQL??
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Dave,
Thank you so much.Preasently I am using full text search feature of sql server 2008.Can u please suggest me sumthing better thah this which will increase my search performance and also will narrow down my search.
Thanks
Shraddha
|
|
|
|
|
You're using the best product for the job. Perhaps you should be looking at your database structure and indexing for better performance.
|
|
|
|
|
ok..What if i write api which is same like windows serach api; but for database?Coes that sound good?
|
|
|
|
|
shraddhapingale wrote: What if i write api which is same like windows serach api; but for database?Coes that sound good?
No, it doesn't.
The best search engine will only works as good as the underlying database structure. But, if you wanted to take, probably, more than a year to develop you're own search engine, far be it from me to stop you.
|
|
|
|
|
Am using Enterprise Library 3.1 for logging exception in my webapplication. In debug mode its logging the exception. But in Publish mode its not logging the its not logging the exception.
Please let me know what needs to be done.
TIA
Regards,
Praveena
|
|
|
|
|
Hi I have vc++ 6.0 application and i am trying to port into .Net framework (VS2005). One of my process needs to be run in Admin credentials and for the I have added manifest file in application resource using
(#define MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID 1
MANIFEST_RESOURCE_ID RT_MANIFEST "Test1.exe.manifest") commands and this get added into resources. I also created the Test1.exe.manifest file and provided credentials as follows:
[
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
<assemblyIdentity version="1.0.0.0"
processorArchitecture="X86"
name="Test1.exe"
type="win32"/>
<description>Description of your application</description>
<trustInfo xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2">
<security>
<requestedPrivileges>
<requestedExecutionLevel
level="requireAdministrator"
uiAccess="true"/>
</requestedPrivileges>
</security>
</trustInfo>
</assembly>
]
Even provided "requireAdministrator" credentials in requirePriviledge tag my application is running with the normal user credentials instead on Admin credentials. While building application with this maifest added it is giving Warning as follows:
[
manifest authoring warning 81010002: Unrecognized Element "requestedPrivileges" in namespace "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2"
]
Please let know how to run applcation with Admin credentails.
THanks
SNI
jhghjghj
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe try
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='yes'?>
<assembly xmlns='urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1' manifestVersion='1.0'>
<assemblyIdentity version="1.0.0.0" processorArchitecture="X86" name="Test1.exe" type="win32"/>
<description>Description of your application</description>
<trustInfo xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3">
<security>
<requestedPrivileges>
<requestedExecutionLevel level='requireAdministrator' uiAccess='false' />
</requestedPrivileges>
</security>
</trustInfo>
</assembly>
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
This is not working. still the output is same.
jhghjghj
|
|
|
|
|
So you voted him down because his suggestion didn't work??
|
|
|
|
|
I guess in all fairness, my answer was unhelpful if it didn't work 
I do, however, take that as an indication that I don't need to look
into it any further.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Very true! I've gotten a few of mine voted down too. Is it just me, or has this become a bit more common recently??
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's mostly because there's only two choices for
voting initial replies...could be wrong.
I actually won't stop pursuing the problem if the OP is
doing his/her part on the other end....doesn't seem to be
the case here
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
You aren't going to get many answers if you vote people down for trying to be helpful. It says "Helpful answer" not "Did it do everything you wanted it to, even though you missed bits out".
|
|
|
|
|
Guys you are taking it in wrong way. My intention is to say "NO" just that bcoz the it is not working and it does not mean that it is not helpful. I think there should one more option available to choose "Helpful but not wotking".
jhghjghj
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you don't choose an option and you post a follow up question. Less contentious all round.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I fired up the old Visual Studio 2005 and created a new project.
I added a file to the project called MyAppName.exe.manifest
(MyAppName.exe MUST be the resulting EXE file name)
In that file I put the following XML:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='yes'?>
<assembly xmlns='urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1' manifestVersion='1.0'>
<assemblyIdentity version="1.0.0.0" processorArchitecture="X86" name="Test1.exe" type="win32"/>
<description>Description of your application</description>
<dependency>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity type='win32' name='Microsoft.VC80.DebugCRT' version='8.0.50727.762' processorArchitecture='x86' publicKeyToken='1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b' />
</dependentAssembly>
</dependency>
<trustInfo xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2">
<security>
<requestedPrivileges>
<requestedExecutionLevel level='requireAdministrator' uiAccess='false' />
</requestedPrivileges>
</security>
</trustInfo>
</assembly>
Note that your dependeny section may be different - create a simple project
(of type similar to yours - Win32, MFC, whatever) with the wizard, build it,
and examine the created .intermediate.manifest file to get the dependencies.
In the project properties/Linker/Manifest File I set Generate Manifest to no
*edit* this step isn't necessary
In the project properties/Build Events/Post-build Event I added the following
command line:
“$(FrameworkSDKDir).\Bin\mt.exe” -nologo -manifest “$(ProjectDir)$(TargetFileName).manifest” -outputresource:”$(TargetPath);#1″
Built the project - no warnings no errors.
Ran the exe from debugger - got the "requires elevation" error.
Ran the exe from Windows Explorer - got the UAC prompt.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
modified on Tuesday, October 14, 2008 2:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
thanks it is working
jhghjghj
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
Is there a way I could force .NET to use class derived from ResourceManager (CustomResourceManager etc) instead of ResourceManager itself? The reason I have to do this is that I need to intercept calls to GetObject and modify object returned from it. The only way to do this is to implement my own ResourceProviderFactory which is not good in my case.
Cheers
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
So why not just wrap the ResourceManager with your own class and have it get the object from ResourceManager, modify it, and return it?? Or am I missing something in your description?
|
|
|
|
|
In a C# Windows Forms app, I have a Panel containing some Labels and Pictureboxes. I have set up delegates at the Panel level to handle MouseEnter and MouseLeave Events. I want something to happen when the user moves the mouse into the Panel and out of the Panel.
However, the Panel MouseEnter and MouseLeave Events are firing when the mouse moves into and out of any of the Pictureboxes and Labels within the Panel. I don't want this behavior. I want them to fire only when the mouse moves into the Panel and out of the Panel.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say you're doing nothing wrong. Because mouse moves above another control it leaves the panel, whether the control is inside or outside the panel.
When mouse leaves the panel, you could check the position of the mouse, is it still inside the panel or not. The same logic can be used in MouseEnter. You can get the position from the Cursor class.
Hope this helps,
Mika
The need to optimize rises from a bad design.
My articles[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
I ran a search for a System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip which matches the width it is given but I was only able to find articles about ToolStripItems of one type or another. If this is a repeat, sorry.
I have a ToolStrip with context which can be resized. I would like the ToolStrip to be as large as it can be. Currently the ToolStrip will take the whole line (row) in the ToolStripContentPanel. If I try to drag the ToolStrip beside a ToolStrip which doesn't take up the whole line, the short one shifts down so that the resizable one can take over the whole line again.
Currently on any client size change of the ToolStrip I set the only item to the MaxItemSize to force the ToolStrip to get as large as it can in the ToolStripContentPanel. This doesn't seem to take into account other strips on the same row.
Although this isn't extremely important to my program's functionality, I'm sure you can understand why this is driving me crazy. If you wouldn't mind helping answer my question I would be very thankful.
How do I create a ToolStrip which will take as much width as it can from the content panel without moving other ToolStrips out of the way?
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if I completely understand your question but try this:
With a toolstrip in a toolstrip container, set the "Stretch" property to True. Then toggle that when you want to allow the toolstrip to be resized.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
