|
You can do this very easily using Custom Actions[^] in your installer project.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
i want code to vibrate pocket pc in vb.net or c#.net.
|
|
|
|
|
And people in Hell want ice water!
Seriously, noone is just going to "give" you the code. You have to write it yourself. Making the PPC vibrate depends entirely on the hardware you have and if the manufacturer has some kind of SDK to give you that ability. There is no 'standard' for this...
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
I want to apply certain commands on the asseblies after they will be placed in the GAC during installation.e-g Tlbexp Assembly1.dll or regasm Assembly1.dll.
Currently i am running the Setup from batch file that starts the setup.Now the Setup will install the assemblies on to the GAC and also copies them into the installation path.
But this is not a good pocedure to accomplish the task.
Is there any good alternative?
Regards
Kamran
Kamran
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all! 
I am having problems on finding out, how to get acces to the certificatestore in PocketPC and WM5 devices.
I want to programmatically add and delete certificates from the personal store using c#. (or any other .NET language).
Hopefully there is someone here that can help me get on my way.
Thanks in advance!
.. No-one?
-- modified at 3:21 Friday 7th July, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
hello friends,
i want to create a program that can display list of dynamic IP of all the users logged in for a website at anytime.
How is it possible in .NET framework.
with regards
Pawan Mishra
MCA, MCP.NET, MCAD.NET
|
|
|
|
|
You can only detect the IP of a user when there is a request. That means that you have to store the IP when the user logs in or visits a page.
A dynamic IP is used when you have a web server and don't have a static IP. A web page visitor doesn't user a dynamic IP.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Gufa,
can you send me code for this problem?
regards
pawanmishraji@gmail.com
Pawan Mishra
MCA, MCP.NET, MCAD.NET
|
|
|
|
|
How the code looks depends very much on how you store the information for the users, e.g. what kind of database, the database layout, what data you store, how you communicate with the database, etc.
You use Request.UserHostAddress to get the IP number of the user.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Gufa,
can you send me code for this problem?
regards
pawanmishraji@gmail.com
Pawan Mishra
MCA, MCP.NET, MCAD.NET
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Microsoft released this article last week:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/winfx/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnlong/html/netfx30.asp
In particular:
Deploying .NET Framework 3.0
This section provides information about deploying the .NET Framework 3.0 for use with your applications.
Software Requirements
To install .NET Framework 3.0, you must have one of the following operating systems installed on the target computer:
* Microsoft Windows XP Home or Microsoft Windows XP Home Professional, with Service Pack 2 or later.
* Microsoft Windows Server 2003 family with Service Pack 1 or later.
So they dropped support for Win98 & Win2K and while we don't care about Win98 at our company, we still have lots of clients with Win2K Servers and Workstations. My question basically is whether this bothers others? I can't really understand why technically it wouldn't run on Win2K if it can run on WinXP...
|
|
|
|
|
You really haven't looked at the Win32 API changes between 2000 and XP, have you? Shell improvements?? I could go on, but why?
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
What I was really getting at was that .NET 2 runs on both (XP and Win2K) and .NET 3 is basically all the .NET 2 class libraries and runtime anyway... why drop support for something that worked? Please don't be so arrogant to think that I don't understand that APIs change between OSs. All I'm trying to say is that the difference between .NET 2 and 3 are minimal yet they dropped support for two operating systems, why?
|
|
|
|
|
I think Win98 and Win2k may have moved into their unsupported phase now. And when that happens MS tend to automatically remove them from their target OSes - regardless of whether technically they could support them. That's the impression I get anyway.
Not sure whether Win2k was unsupported when .NET 2 was released but I guess when .NET 2 was in beta it wasn't - hence support for Win2k. However, it's probably not quite as simple as that - more their guess as to how many developers are still on Win2k.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Because Win98 and 2000 are both End-Of-Life as far as Microsoft is concerned. But, yes, all the current classes and stuff would work, but the stuff that .NET 3 adds, like WPF, won't work on 2000.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: Win98 and 2000 are both End-Of-Life
Don't care about Win98 but  for Windows 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yes, apart from my post below I just remembered that .NET 3 is just all the WinFX stuff rebranded. This was only ever planned to be available for Vista and WinXP - hence no Win 98 or Win2k, regardless.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
what is the best code documentation generator for .VS 2005?
Is it NDoc for VS.NET 2005 the best, or you know better alternatives?
Thank you for suggestions
|
|
|
|
|
I have a simple component in COM+ which will pass an object to a client app and then accept it back. All that the client is doing is updating one of the properties in the object. However, when I pass the object back I am getting the fillowing error:
Cannot find the assembly DataStore, Version=1.0.2371.28609, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c8d286e2247b3c51.
where "DataStore" is the name of the dll which contains the class of the object I am passing around.
I do not understand why it will happily pass the object out of COM+ but then error when it is returned. (Class has been marked with "[Serializable]") Can anyone help at all?
For ref, I have the following binaries:
1) dll in COM+
2) exe on client
3) dll on client which is called by exe and also calls COM+ package
4) dll containing data storage object which resides on Client and COM+ server (although not included in the COM+ package itself).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying to implement an MS-IME dictionary in C#. According to the documentation here[^], I need to make a method called CreateIImeActiveDictInstance that MS-IME will hunt down and call. Problem is, I can't think of a way to make a global method in C#. I do know that MSIL is capable of global methods. If I can, I want to avoid having to write it in C++.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way to do this in C#.
As you say, MSIL supports it, so it would be possible to write a small piece of MSIL that implements the required method. From there, you would need to make a single DLL; either disassembling the C# code with ILDASM then building the disassembled code plus the new MSIL file with ILASM, or if you're targetting .NET 2.0, using Visual C++'s link.exe. See this topic[^] for more.
You could also use a small piece of C++/CLI or Managed C++ code to do this. Again, you'd have to either disassemble/reassemble or use the VC++ 2005 linker.
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to install a app that was made a year ago on a new computer with net framework 2.0 installed but when I fired up the app it crashed and demanded that I install net framework 1.1! Is this a bug in the app or do all users of said app have to install dnf1.1 even if they have 2.0 already?
If its a bug, how do I remedy it?
Grateful for any clarification
Ulf Rosvall
|
|
|
|
|
If the app is demanding the .NET Framework 1.1, you'll have to install it. Not every app that was written under 1.1 will work with 2.0. There ARE breaking changes between 1.1 and 2.0.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
Do you by that mean that it is possible to write a app under 1.1 that will work
under 2.0 whithout the installation of 1.1?
Could you specify som problematic points? Or point me in the direction of a FAQ or like.
I do have the source for the app in question, if I could modify it so as to not demand the installation of the 1.1 on a machine that allready has 2.0 installed that would be very worthwhile.
Thanks
Ulf
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
