|
This will get the path to the currently running executable:
System.Reflection.Assembly.GetAssembly(this.GetType()).Location;
-Tosi
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks alot David, I appreciated it!
Todd
|
|
|
|
|
I want to give design-time support to a property which is a type of custom class. I guess I have to use some design-time attributes, but I couldn't find the correct one. Below is a sample coding.
public class MyClass
{
public int MyInt {...}
public string MyString {...}
}
public class MyComponent : System.ComponentModel.Component
{
public MyClass MyClassProperty
{
get {...}
set {...}
}
}
I'll really appreciate it if someone can help me with this.
Thanks.
UB
You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all... after all, we're all alike. +++Mentor+++
|
|
|
|
|
What do you want to happen? Like a Size is for a Control.Size property? You should first make MyClass a struct (you're using this more as a seldomly-used value type that is allocated on the stack). You should also add the CatagoryAttribute and DescriptionAttribute. If you want it expandable like the Size property of a Control, you'll need to implement a TypeConverter and use the TypeConverterAttribute. Optionally, use the ImmutableAttribute, although you can emulate the behavior in your derived TypeConverter. All this is documented in the System.ComponentModel namespace, as well as Design-time Attributes for Components[^] and Enhancing Design-time Support[^], both good sections in the .NET Framework SDK.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your help. I thought there's an easier way to do this without using a TypeConverter. I'll look in those sections in the .NET Framework SDK. Thanks for your time 
UB
You may stop this individual, but you can't stop us all... after all, we're all alike. +++Mentor+++
|
|
|
|
|
If you create a C# .NET control, will it work with all its functionalities in a Windows 2000 environment or any other environment without the .NET runtime library installed on the system? Is there a way to make it work by adding lines of code?
|
|
|
|
|
If you write something to be used on the .Net runtime, then the .Net runtime must be installed for it to use. Is that a tautology?
Maybe you are asking the wrong question. Why would you want to have a .Net binary run without the .Net runtime environment?
|
|
|
|
|
Well the thing is, I want to build a control that is going to be used in ActiveX containers... I was hoping I could build one using C# instead of writing an ActiveX control... Any thoughts about that particular problem?
|
|
|
|
|
ActiveX is a technology, not a language. You can write one in C++, C#, VB, VB.NET, and many more that are COM compatible. If you write this in .NET, it will require the .NET runtime to be installed, just like Java requires the JRE, C/C++ requires the C/C++ runtime, VB the VB Virtual Machine, etc.
If you don't want to have to install the .NET Framework, then write it in C/C++ and VB, but make sure you include their runtimes (albeit much smaller).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Larsen wrote:
Is that a tautology?
Good word Tom!
- Nick Parker
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
I'm a newbie in C# and comming from C++/MFC.
I'm building my first application in C#.
I have created a class derived from Object
public class Block : Object
{
Block()
{ Initialize(); }
public bool Initialize()
{ Debug.WriteLine("Block.Initialize"); ... }
...
}
As the array is a 2D array of Block, I have instanciated the arry like that:
Block[,] board=new Block[m_nHeight, m_nWidth];
while default values for m_nHeight is 20 and m_nWidth is 10.
When I look at the trace, I see only 0 calls for the method Block.Initialize. 
How can it be possible? Are all the Block object created when I do "m_board=new Block[m_nHeight, m_nWidth];"??? or must I browse the array and call m_board[i, j]=new Block()? If all blocks are created, I should get 200 lines of "Block.Initialize"...
Can anybody explain what's wrong?
Best regards.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, you don't need to derive from Object. If you don't specify a base class, Object is assumed. This just looks bad.
Second, you're not creating a new instance of Block, only a new Block[] array (which is of type Array). You won't create a new instance of Block until you use new:
Block[,] board = new Block[m_nHeight, m_nWidth];
board[0, 0] = new Block(); Find more information about arrays at http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/csref/html/vclrfArraysPG.asp[^].
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for the answer.
So, if I undertand well, in C#, I need to browse my array and instanciate a "new Block" for each cells of the array right?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, only it's "iterate" not "browse".
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
so, I do a the following:
<br />
...<br />
m_nHeight=20;<br />
m_nWidth=10;<br />
...<br />
m_board=new Block[m_nHeight, m_nWidth];<br />
for (int i=0; i < m_nHeight; i ++ )<br />
for (int j=0; j < m_nWidth; j ++ )<br />
m_board[i, j]=new Block();<br />
but a strange thing, I have inserted a trace inside the constructor of the Block class, and when I look at the trace, instead of having 200 calls of Block.Block, I have 400 calls 20x10=200...
|
|
|
|
|
You had a trace in your Initialize method before. Are you sure you're not getting 200 lines with "Block.Block" and 200 lines with "Block.Initialize"? If not, I'd really need to see the rest of the Block class code and the full creation block in which you gave a fragment of above.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Heath,
I have rebuild the code, and indeed, there are 200 calls now
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
I use RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownClientType(typeof(type),url) to register a type as a wellknown client type. Is it possible to unregister this type to register it again with another url (or to change the url for the registered type) without restarting my application?
|
|
|
|
|
First, let me advocate that a well-known client Type can't be well-known if you change its URI.
That being said, you can use RemotingServices.Disconnect. If you have a reference to the registered object, just pass it to the static Disconnect method. If you don't have an instance of it available, you can get one using other methods of the RemotingServices class.
Registering it with another URI is as simple as what you've already done.
Another way is to simply shut down the .NET Remoting host, such as a Windows Service, IIS, or some other program, but that's most likely not what you want in this case.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
Thanks for your effort!
Unfortunately doesn't work it...
I want to explain the situation more detailed:
When the client starts his application, he get's a login-dialog, where he has to type in the servername (and username, password ....) he wants to connect to. When the client types in a servername, that does not exist or the server is not available, he must get a new chance to login, without restarting his application.
When he clicks the Login-Button I do something like this:
<br />
Dispather MyDispatcher;<br />
RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownClient(typeof(Dispatcher),URL);<br />
MyDispatcher=new Dispatcher();<br />
MyDispatcher.Login(...);<br />
...<br />
If an error occures (severname incorrect or server not available) I have to unregister this Dispather-object first, before I can register it again with another URL. RemotingServices.Disconnect(Dispatcher) does not work, because it's for Serverobjects. And Reregistering (with RegisterWellKnownClient) throws an exception ("System.Runtime.Remoting.RemotingException: Es wurde versucht, die bereits umgeleitete Aktivierung des Typs 'Dispatcher, ccShared' erneut umzuleiten.").
What can I do?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
I found a solution for this problem by myself!
My Server marshals the Serverobject (RemotingServices.Marshal) and my Client connects that object (RemotingServices.Connect).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I'm seeking a way to emulate "Send To" function.
I just need to pass a file to .MAPIMail (it can pass a file to the default mua). .MAPIMail is normally located in C:\Documents and Settings\Default User\SendTo\ but doesn't have to use them. Simply prepare a file named like foo@test.local.MAPIMail (zero-byte) and drop a file with explorer. It'll attache the file to the default mua.
If anyone knows about this, please let me know. I'm willing run the default e-mail client and a file attached.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
I want Send To function for one of my C# projects too and in that time I couldn't find a .NET way for it, so I wrote a Shell Extension which do some task for my SEND TO function and register it with my application. But as I'm thinking now , those steps are doable in .NET too(not sure). This[^] article show you the VC6 way. If you couldn't translate it to .NET at least you can make that dll in VC6 which handle your job.
Mazy
No sig. available now.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Magy. So, it sounds like there is no way in C# and I at least need to import a dll.
|
|
|
|
|
For more help on Shell in C# you could search this site too.
Mazy
No sig. available now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
