|
As this is an ASP.NET related question perhaps you would like to ask it int the correct forum.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two methods for doing this:
Server.Transfer("yourpagename.aspx");
or
Response.Redirect("yourpagename.aspx");
Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
|
What is that application that generates *.chm file automatically based on a dll?
Don't forget, that's Persian Gulf not Arabian gulf!
|
|
|
|
|
Have you looked at NDoc?
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins
|
|
|
|
|
struct tagSTGMEDIUM
{
int tymed;
[switch_type(int), switch_is((int) tymed)]
union
{
[case(TYMED_GDI)] HBITMAP hBitmap;
[case(TYMED_MFPICT)] HMETAFILEPICT hMetaFilePict;
[case(TYMED_ENHMF)] HENHMETAFILE hEnhMetaFile;
[case(TYMED_HGLOBAL)] HGLOBAL hGlobal;
[case(TYMED_FILE)] LPWSTR lpszFileName;
[case(TYMED_ISTREAM)] IStream *pstm;
[case(TYMED_ISTORAGE)] IStorage *pstg;
[default] ;
};
[unique] IUnknown *pUnkForRelease;
}
The above code is the clas STGMEDIUM
what I'd like to know is how to translate this to C#.
I've figured out the enumeration dictates what type of object the pointer "union" represents, and more or less how it works. But how would I make this case statement in C# that sets the type of an object, in a way in which C would understand?
Is this actualy nescessary? Or can I declare an object variable, and produce a case statement in the structure based on the enumeration? Is this portable to C? Or would the structs be incompatible?
Cheers
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, a better representation would be:
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public struct STDMEDIUM
{
public int tymed;
public IntPtr handle;
public IntPtr pUnkForRelease;
}The handle will work for all cases, since each member is just a pointer, including lpszFileName (since a string pointer is a pointer to the first character in the array). BTW, this is how Microsoft has created their STGMEDIUM struct for internal use as well. As I mentioned before, you'd be wise to learn IL and use ildasm.exe to examine the classes and structs in the .NET BCL, or get yourself a good decompiler like .NET Reflector[^] and examine what you need in System.Windows.Forms. As I mentioned before, the .NET version of IDataObject eventually gets transformed into the COM version of IDataObject and all the .NET-related drag-n-drop stuff is just a wrapper around the native functions and structs, which are all P/Invoked and defined in the System.Windows.Forms.dll assembly (as internal, nested members). This could save you a lot of time in creating what you need (you'll still need to create it, but at least you can get pointers about how to do so from the defined members in that aforementioned assembly).
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks heath, most helpful.
I'll make the enumeration in C# and use that to interpret / designate the integer.
What is IL?
I will definitely look into it.
Cheers
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
IL is Intermediate Language, it's the code that compilers targeting the CLR produce - this is what makes the source language unimportant, because they compile down to IL, or to be more specific, MSIL or Microsoft IL, which is just some extensions to the Common IL specification.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
I've looked at the Reflector program.
Very interesting.
However, I have found all the draganddrop related classes, except the DoDragDrop.
Am I missing something? It's not in there anywere.
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
Found it.
Just got lost looking for a method in Form, when it's in Control.
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong one - you must P/Invoke the native DoDragDrop. It is also in there.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
I found the one that uses the STGMEDIUM structure you pointed out to me.
Where would the native COM DoDragDrop method be?
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
System.Windows.Forms.SafeNativeMethods.DoDragDrop. You really should try to P/Invoke these yourself, though, and then compare them to what Microsoft did. It's a much better way to learn about marshaling and Types.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
I've always found that, if i have a minimal understanding of something, it is helped more by looking at what others do than blundering around in the dark.
If I know roughly what I am doing, then I am happy to try and find my own way.
I shall look it up as you said, and study it.
Marshaling and Types I already understand, even if it's only rudimetry. What I need to do is study the classes to see what I can do with them.
Thanks again.
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
I've gone through the magic-eye and slipstick and microsoft tutorials on extending office applications, but I am none the wiser, and hoping someone here can point me in the right direction.
How do I add a menu-option to (say) the Tools menu in Outlook?
I know:
* Its a COM Add-in thing
* I'm using an IDT2Extensibility
* I have to do it in the OnConnection event that is fired
I have found examples and plenty of information about adding buttons, but I really want to add a menu option - either within the Tools menu or via a new top level menu.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I did Copy Text from Word document and I try to paste it into a RichTextBox Control, Text that Contain digit and signs togther are upside down
It go's like this : if in the doc there is text like this "972-363534" when I paste it looks like this "363534-972".
How can I fix this problem by code or some other way?
thnaks
Eran Alshech
|
|
|
|
|
  That is weird! Download http://www.codeproject.com/clipboard/clipspy.asp[^] and see what the clipboard formats that are used are. Post them here and maybe this'll help a bit.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Well I try it and I found that to word copy the data to the clipbord very well , It's the richTextBox that flip the text.
again : I copy this text : 054-363534
and when I paste it into RichTextBox it's look like this: 363534-054
|
|
|
|
|
What do I use to represent a C++ Long in C#?
I know DWORD is int, and C# Long is not the same as C++ LONG.
C# uses 8 bytes, C++ uses 4.
So what do I do to wrap one to the other?
Thanks
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
In Visual Basic 6, Integer equals C#'s short, so I think that this may be the case with C++ too (I don't know C++, you see). Thus, int should do the trick.
- Daniël Pelsmaeker
"To survive it is often necessary to fight, and to fight you have to dirty yourself."
- George Orwell
|
|
|
|
|
C++ - C# (Win32)
----------------
int = int
long = int
__int64 = long
DWORD = uint
Regards,
Alvaro
He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, be careful with uint. It's not CLS-compliant and you should try to avoid those. I have almost always used int for DWORD with absolutely no problems. Microsoft does the same throughout the BCL, too. While DWORD's can't be negative, the bit representation is still the same so even passing a negative int to a DWORD in some native function works.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Heath Stewart wrote:
It's not CLS-compliant and you should try to avoid those.
as long as it is not publicly accessable, iow locals, private fields.
one should always use the correct type though, although int will probably work 31/32 times 
leppie::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
leppie wrote:
although int will probably work 31/32 times
Exactly! As I was saying, though, this usually isn't a problem. The biggest reason I typically use int is because Microsoft does in their BCL. Since they wrote the .NET Framework, seems reasonable to me. Of course, I guess worrying about CLS-compliancy is pretty moot if you're using a uint to P/Invoke a native call, huh? 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
Using Windows XP explorer I just tried to search for some words that I know are in comments within some of my .cs files. All the searches turned up empty! I double checked the directory and the spelling. I checked all of the options to be sure case or some other setting was not the issue. Anyone seen this, know why it doesn't work, or what I might be doing wrong?
>>>-----> MikeO
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
