|
Try to 'serialize' the object, as opposed to simply trying to wildly dump it's contents. There's an example using the XmlSerializer on MSDN; once it works, you replace the XmlSerializer with a BinaryFormatter and you're done.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^] it is. Serialization may take some getting-used-to, but it's more versatile than dumping memory.
I'd recommend building it in two separate steps; First, create a small console-app to serialize a random object. Once that works, you should be able to switch between Xml-serialization and binary with ease.
Second part would be to store that "information" in a database. That will work the same way for any information; if you get stuck once you're there, simply come back and we'll look at it again 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, i solved the issue,
my error was that i was trying to serialize an object of type DataGridViewRowCollection
which is not marked as a Serializable object, i made my custom class which marked as Serializable, i had stored all the data in the DataGridViewRowCollection in that class,
now everything is OK
thanks again,
|
|
|
|
|
i want to create 3 tier architecture in asp.net and c# using stored procedure
tannu
|
|
|
|
|
tannu dwivedi wrote: i want to create
Okay so go ahead and do that. Did you maybe have some sort of a question that you wanted to ask?
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
modified 11-Oct-12 10:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
..and you're looking for a tutorial? Did not find anything on Google? Perhaps you'd like to start with Tier 1[^] and work your way up from there?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Developers
How We Can Stop SQL Injection With Delegate ?
Please Help ME Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
You can't that makes no sense whatsoever.
You stop SQL Injection attacks (mainly) by using named parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
Really Really Thank you For Helping ME .
Thank You Very Much BUT I Do That Before With Creating Delegate And I Think one Code Can Do Faster And This is Why i Sent That Question.
|
|
|
|
|
Use a parameterized query[^]; the word 'delegate' is out of place here.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Proper validations inside a parameterized stored procedures can help reduce SQL injection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All Developers I have A Problem :
How I can Change Opacity Of a Control IN Windows Application C#.net .. I Know How I can Change Form Opacity But How we can Change Control Opacity Like A button.
Thanx Developers
|
|
|
|
|
Why Are All Your Questions Written In Title Casing? It Looks Really Dumb In Normal Sentences. Stop It.
|
|
|
|
|
The native button doesn't support transparancy.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
the transparece color on the form can be used for this if he choses the transparece color to be the same of the button? or this would just make a hole in the form?
(like when you set the transparece color to be white and put a textbox on the form)
the form is really the only control that suport transparece?
I'm brazilian and english (well, human languages in general) aren't my best skill, so, sorry by my english. (if you want we can speak in C# or VB.Net =p)
|
|
|
|
|
Sentenryu wrote: the transparece color on the form can be used for this if he choses the transparece color to be the same of the button? or this would just make a hole in the form?
It would show the button, as the button is not opaque, does it's own drawing, and knows nothing about all the fancy transparencies.
The simple solution is to use a label.
Sentenryu wrote: the form is really the only control that suport transparece?
Traditionally, even the form did not support that. I still do not see any added value in having the option.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
agreed, the only use for transparence in a form is to make that fancy game menus as mass effect have, but even then the usefulness of this is questionable...
I'm brazilian and english (well, human languages in general) aren't my best skill, so, sorry by my english. (if you want we can speak in C# or VB.Net =p)
|
|
|
|
|
What about the Johnny Foreigner button?
|
|
|
|
|
Controls don't support opacity, only forms do.
The only way to make it work is to create your own version of the controls you want and paint them yourself.
Or, use WPF instead of Windows Forms, but if you're not familiar with WPF the learning curve is pretty steep.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi I am creating a FTP library to connect securly on 990 port.
Below is the code
FTPFactory ftp = new FTPFactory();
ftp.setDebug(true);
ftp.setRemoteHost("207.161.116.232");
ftp.setRemotePort(990);
ftp.loginWithoutUser();
string cmd = "AUTH SSL";
ftp.sendCommand(cmd);
It is from the codeproject itself An FTP secure client library for C#[^]
But i get this error in loginWithoutUser function in readreply()
431 Unable to negotiate secure command connection
I tried it by disabling by firewall also but still get this error. Any one knows how to get around this?
|
|
|
|
|
If you've taken the code from the article, you should ideally post this question in the article discussion at the bottom of the article.
|
|
|
|
|
Problem:First C# 2008 app did not find the location of where the executable was located for the second program.
When my company deployed my C# 2008 and 2010 applications to a test server, one of the applications did not use the configuation set for where the executable was suppose to be at? Our network administrator found where the first program thinks the second executable was at.
Thus I am trying to determine why one of the programs did not take the setting it was given.
The location the first program was looking at was at:
c:/server name/share directory name/test/app1.exe.
The only way I can think this location was picked since on a few tries, the location of the executable as was at:
//server name/share directory name/test/app1.exe
Is this accidently? Should I have the network administrator reboot the test server to see if the c:/server name/share directory name/test/app1.exe. location request goes away?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
