|
A foreach loop can run on anything that implements IEnumerable - so, IMO, this should be fine, if that was your question.
I dont know what has been implemented in GetProcessFromSystem() so this cannot be commented upon.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
Visit the Hindi forum here.
|
|
|
|
|
is GetProcessFromSystem() called each loop? if so it can give a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
nothing inside the parentheses of foreach is called more than once.
it would be different if you had a for, e.g.:
for(int i=0; i<GetProcessFromSystem().Count; i++) { ... }
would evaluate the termination test, and hence call the method, upon each iteration.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, this was the answer i was looking.
|
|
|
|
|
for this to work, GetProcessFromSystem() has to return an IEnumerable. If it does, the foreach will be happy. However, if the enumerable would change while foreach is iterating over it, an exception would be thrown.
Whether GetProcessFromSystem() implements and returns the information you hope to get cannot be determined without seeing it.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Whether GetProcessFromSystem() implements and returns the information you hope to get cannot be determined without seeing it.
If you want, it returns List<Process>, every time is called. If some app would crash and dissapear. Everytime this method calles, it construct the list from scratch. The only wory for me is that it wouldn't dissapear from the list, while it is in loop. It seems i am going to localize it first before passing to foreach loop.
Also that method is a standart as you would get the same list from task manager
|
|
|
|
|
When the method is returning a List, and no one is altering the list, then the list remains as is. Some process crashing, being killed or getting started will not modify the list.
If you don't understand or don't trust how foreach works, then I can only suggest you study it, or stop using it.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming, for the sake of this answer, that GetProcessFromSystem() returns a List<Process> it would be better to do:
List<Process> procs = GetProcessFromSystem();
foreach (Process proc in procs)
{
............
............
}
Doing it the way you first proposed would be more greedy for system resources as (I think) GPFS() would be called on each iteration of the foreach loop, consuming resources. In addition the list could easily change, items might be added or even removed. Anything implementing <code>IEnumerable can give unpredictable results, especially if things are removed from the list.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Can't agree with that.
In for (int x=0; x<bitmap.Width; x++) the Width property is fetched over and over, once per iteration, and returning the same value all the time; so it makes a lot of sense to use a local variable.
Inforeach(type someVar in someExpressionYieldingAnEnumerator) the expression is evaluated once, and the resulting enumerator is worked with (i.e. its MoveNext method is called once per iteration). Using a local variable for holding the enumerator does not change a thing, except it adds to the typing and the risk of errors.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
I stand corrected. (Well actually I'm sitting)
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
still facing South?
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, I haven't rearranged the furniture.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: Doing it the way you first proposed would be more greedy for system resources as (I think) GPFS() would be called on each iteration of the foreach loop,
No, it wouldn't. Your code is functionally identical to the OP's code. The code in the foreach's paranthesis is executed only once and the code in the curly braces is executed for each item in the collection returned by the paranthesis code.
Now, if the collection we modified by a background thread or by the code in the curly braces, then you've got a problem...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
I'll try to remember that and probably fail.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
 Then what's with the elephant??
|
|
|
|
|
foreach(Elephant I in GetMyZoo()) I.CantRemember();
|
|
|
|
|
The Elephant is Henry Minute.
I have to do the typing for him because we cannot find a large enough keyboard.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
You should buy him an iPhone then. There is this little app that lets him trumphet in morse code, each character gets translated automatically in a regular keystroke.
If he dislikes the iPhone (or when the neighbors object), there is an alternative based on a Wii Fit. That requires flapping the ears, this time using what amounts to the semaphore alphabet.
|
|
|
|
|
We tried your second suggestion. Never again.
He got a little excited once and it took 3 weeks and a whole case of baby-oil to get his ears untangled.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
is there a YouTube reference, or any other proof of bodily harm, discomfort, or damage; so others could benefit and maybe start a class action suit against Nintendo?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone.
I´m on the hunt for some good code examples on how to convert a bitmap file (In my case a monochrome bitmap) to an ASCII string.
This ASCII string will be sent to a QLS-printer to be printed.
There must be someone who has run in to the same problem as myself, would anyone like to share his/her experience?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you have the driver that goes with your printer? Try this[^].
BTW: I fail to see how an image would need to be converted into an ASCII string.
And what would you do if you had such string? It would print as text anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually don't have access to the printer at the moment to be able to test and the thing is that the printer can handle either the .PCX file format or ASCII format. According to the project specifications I must convert the .BMP-file I have to ASCII.
|
|
|
|
|
Then you should hunt for the printer's documentation. Although I still think getting the proper driver is the right way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
ASCII is text. So define how this image is supposed to be "converted to ASCII". Are you talking about "ASCII art"? Are you saying that the printer understands some bitmap format and the image has to be converted into a string of commands that the printer understands in order to printer the image?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
