|
This is a Debug build running from inside Studio. I can try to debug through either the DLL's project or the executable I'm trying to build, and I get the same error both ways.
DC
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a little test to make sure debugging isn't the problem. Add Console.WriteLine("Before new Class1()"); before you instantiate Class1, and Console.WriteLine("After new Class1()"); after then run the command from the command line in your project's root followed by bin\debug (be default, unless you changed it). Do you see both lines output to the console?
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Neither line outputs to the console.
DC
|
|
|
|
|
Here's something else; if I run the program from the console, the last line of the log output reads:
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/Documents and Settings/MyName/Visual Studio Projects/StubCalls/bin/Debug/SwathPrinter.DLL
The DLL is already in that folder.
DC
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've found the problem.
Dependency walker (http://www.dependencywalker.com) showed me four DLLs that were needed for loading. I don't know why the error message earlier couldn't just tell me what the dependencies were. So frustrating. Thanks for the help.
DC
|
|
|
|
|
A .NET assembly on Windows is still a PE/COFF executable like all other executables, even from VB. The entry point in the PE/COFF .exe actually points to _CorExeMain in mscoree.dll, which does a number of things before executing your assembly's entry point in a managed AppDomain. This executable can still have Win32 dependencies that need to be loaded, as can its dependencies.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine. Fusion is just telling you that it's attempting to "download" (used loosely) the assembly using a list of paths to resolve the assembly according to How the Runtime Locates Assemblies[^].
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
hi
Is it possible to write a program that allows us to cotrol users ability to run applications on the computer and determine which programs the user can run and prevent the user from being able to access the rest of te programs. If that's possible, what are the functions that I can use within C# that'll allow me do do this.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
That's an IT issue, not really a programming issue. IT Administrators need to use ACLs (Access Control Lists) in Windows NT (on which Win2K, XP, and 2K3 are based, including all newer Windows to be released like "Longhorn") to allow or disallow users or - better yet - groups to run certain applications by removing the Read and Execute permissions (more specifically the Execute permission). To do that is a programming topic that can be solved in numerous ways, from using Process.Start on the cacls.exe console application to using System.DirectoryServices classes with the "WinNT://" scheme, which you can read more about at http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/adsi/adsi/winnt_adspath.asp[^].
Short of that there's no easy - nor recommended way - of doing what you want.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
when i am connecting to this site,i get
An unhandled exception of type 'System.Net.WebException' occurred in system.dll
Additional information: The underlying connection was closed: The server committed an HTTP protocol violation.
how do i solve this issue
WebResponse objWebResponse =
WebRequest.Create("http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr").GetResponse();
BufferedStream objBufStream = new BufferedStream(objWebResponse.GetResponseStream());
FileStream objFileStream = new FileStream("c:\\webSample.html",FileMode.Create);
byte[] b = new byte[8192];
int iRead = 0;
do
{
iRead = objBufStream.Read(b,0,b.Length);
objFileStream.Write(b,0,b.Length);
}while( iRead > 0);
objBufStream.Close();
objFileStream.Close();
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, i did it like everyone does it and extended collection base...and have all the usual functions: add, remove, insert, etc. In all these i trip an action ...like OnItemsAdded, OnItemsRemoved, etc.
Now the problem i see occurs when the control collection is altered through a property grid (doesnt matter if its in vs.net or the property grid on my test form).
In this situation i get no notification through any of my other collection actions...for ex. when you add something with property grid...you would assume that it used your insert function...or indexer "this[ int index ]"...but placing a action tripwire in both locals did not generate any response...and i need these actions to go off so i can determine if my control should refresh when an item is added to the collection.
I did some googling that revealed the possibility of overriding some of collectionbase's actions:
i tried all of them, but OnInsertComplete was the only one that fired when items in the collection were altered or added through a property grid
problem with this approach is it fires to much! i can add an item to the collection, and it will fire for every item in the collection! this results in my control looking like trash everytime a item is changed or added with tons of extra refreshing occuring. A way i could stop this is only allowing it to set off a refresh while in designmode so i don't have to worry about extra refresh calls during the time when my collection is solely modified through actions i implemented...i.e.
<br />
public void Add(string text)<br />
{<br />
List.Add(new SimpleListItem(text));<br />
OnItemsAdded(this, new System.EventArgs(), List.Count - 1);<br />
}<br />
and the rest...but thats alot of performance lost with the OnInsert function calling my collection's action...which then notifies subscribers...and then in my control having to check if its in designmode and needs to be refreshed...everytime an item is added or changed, and for every single item in the collection over and over until this whole process occurs once for each item...thats just wrong!!!
Maybe i can get away with making my own collection that doesn't inherit collectionbase...this way i can control it way better...i wonder if anyones done this already?...that would help alot.
|
|
|
|
|
You're subject and message content have nothing to do with each other. Which is it that you want? Some collections - like the ArrayList - expose a Synchronized method that you can get a thread-safe IList or ICollection (which IList inherits).
For your problem you need to realize that many classes don't use your class but rather the underlying IList or ICollection interface, meaning that your typed methods like int Add(MyObject obj) will not be called. When your class is cast to an IList or any other interface the implementation of those interface methods or properties is used - not yours.
If you inherit from CollectionBase, all you need to do is override the OnEventName methods and do what you need to, like perhaps even firing events if that's what you need, or instrumenting your class. If you look at the implementing of CollectionBase using ildasm.exe from the .NET Framework SDK or .NET Reflector you can search for online, you will see that OnInsertComplete is all that is called for IList.Add and IList.Insert when you use the List property instead of the InnerList property. The documentation for these properties even states that. If you want to fire your own events than use the InnerList property. The List property IS the IList implementation of your CollectionBase derivative, which will invoke those On* methods.
The documentation is rather clear about this, IMO, but you can always use utilities like .NET Reflector to see how these classes work internally.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Is this the way i'm supposed to handle this
public class Class4 : CollectionBase<br />
{<br />
public void Add(object value)<br />
{<br />
List.Add(value)<br />
}<br />
<br />
protected override void OnInsertComplete(int index, object value)<br />
{<br />
}<br />
}
p.s. renamed thread 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, except if your parameter is simply accepting an object, you might as well use the ArrayList. Of course, it doesn't have event or event handlers, so maybe that's a reason to inherit from CollectionBase, too.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
I need fix UserControl on a desktop window. How I can make it?
Exenten
|
|
|
|
|
You don't make any mention of what UserControl, what it does/doesn't do, what is broken/supposed to do, who wrote it (if not you), and what you mean by "on a desktop window". So all we can tell you is start VIsual Studio .NET and go from there.
RageInTheMachine9532
"...a pungent, ghastly, stinky piece of cheese!" -- The Roaming Gnome
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody, I am developing an application that use DataGrid to display data. The built-in ability of the datagrid is that when users click on a column header, data will be sorted by that column. Are there any way to know which column data are being sorted by? And how can we sort data display in DataGrid by a column by code (i.e users do not need to click on that column header)?
|
|
|
|
|
The DataGrid doesn't sort anything - the DataView does. You get a DataView by default when you bind a DataSet or DataTable to the DataGrid.DataSource, but you can also do this separately:
DataView view = new DataView(dataSet1.Tables["Table1"]);
view.Sort = "LastName, FirstName";
dataGrid1.DataSource = view; When the DataView is sorted, the index of a particular should not change while it would with the DataGrid (because the data and view on the data are out of sync), meaning you have to use the CurrencyManager to get the right row.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your helping!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to build a simple web app in C# that will add and remove appointments to an Excange server (2003) on my LAN. I need to add a reference in my application for CDOEX (Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 Library), which contains all the classes and interfaces I need, but this DLL is only installed during the Exchange installation. I'm doing my development on an XP Pro machine, and the web app will obviously be deployed on the Exchange server. The thing is, Exchange will not install on XP (only 2000 Server or 2003 Server), so testing this thing locally is not an option. Is there a way to do all of my development/testing on the remote server with VS.NET installed on my local machine?
Thanks for any help,
-Drew
|
|
|
|
|
Use System.Web.Mail if all you want is CDO functionality. Unless you actually need CDOEX, just use CDO which is installed as a client library on Win2K and up (i.e., included in XP and Win2K3) and that Exchange and the Microsoft Virtual SMTP Services provide in XP and Win2K3 as part of IIS. System.Web.Mail uses CDO, which generally makes it the wrong choice when general SMTP functionality is needed, especially since it requires proper client configuration. If you've already committed your clients to CDO/CDOEX, you might as well use System.Web.Mail.
Be sure to reference System.Web.dll which defines the classes under System.Web.Mail in your project.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know of anything out there that I can use to dial up a numeric pager, leave a number and then hang up? It is not a "fancy" pager. No message, not text, no nothing. Just a regular old pager.
I have a asp.net c# page. User clicks a button that says "Page Me." Somehow the box with the modem dials up the pager and leaves the numeric page (all same phone number left).
I can do it manually through hyperterminal, but not sure if I can control this with c#.
Thank you for any help.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to either use or write a TAPI client to connect to the modem. Search this site using the text box at the top (under the logo) for "TAPI", or click "Search comments" above to search this forum for "TAPI", which we've discussed a lot. Some people have even given their opinions about third-party libraries that provide TAPI functionality.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Software Design Engineer
Developer Division Sustained Engineering
Microsoft
[My Articles] [My Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I’m programming a web app using c# and asp.net and I am trying to display a list of performances that are scheduled in the next month, in a listbox. So I need to get today’s date in my code and compare it to the dates of all the concerts and display the appropriate ones. My main problem is getting today’s date can anyone help.
Thanks in advance
Tadhg88
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
