|
What?
Why don't you compile them yourself? You can use Visual Studio Express or the .NET Framework SDK to compile from command prompt. You can then easily check the errors and fix them.
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have compiler or Visual Studio at home.I have also tried to download SDK from microsoft but it is giving errors.
sorry for the inconvenience.
-- modified at 12:51 Saturday 11th November, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
It's pretty clear why this doesnt compile. Only variables, properties and methods can be placed inside a class. Everything else should be inside methods.
class Class1
{
public static void Main(String[] args)
{
}
}
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't even try to compile the mess, I just looked at it. That's why the error messages are more to the point than the ones you would get from the compiler:
DateTime dt1=new DateTime(Monday,November 06,2006)
Variable 'Monday' is not defined.
'November 06' is not a valid expression.
There is no constructor for the DateTime structure that takes those arguments.
DateTime dt2=new DateTime(Wednesday,November 08,2006)
Variable 'Wednesday' is not defined.
'November 08' is not a valid expression.
There is no constructor for the DateTime structure that takes those arguments.
if(DateTime.compare(dt1,dt2)<0)
The operator is "Compare", not "compare".
Friend4u wrote: else if(DateTime.compare(dt1,dt2)==0)
The method is named 'Compare', not 'compare'.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to specify a type contraint that operator== is supported?
or any way to deal with that?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Off the top of my head, I can only think of:
where T : System.IComparable<T>
Geor
|
|
|
|
|
It was suposed to work for value types, too 
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the IEquatable interface.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen, are you looking to just compare 2 reference types? If so,
bool AreEqual<T>(T first, T second)
where T : class
{
return first == second;
}
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted it to work for both reference nad value types, and use overloaded comparison operators if any - but that doesn't seem possible in C#.
I've replaced the template type with object, and use IComparable if implemented, otherwise I fall back to comparing the references.
thank you.
Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Velopers, Develprs, Developers!
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify!|Fold With Us!
|
|
|
|
|
You have to use the IEquatable interface.
More information on the "operator in generics" problem: www.codeproject.com/csharp/genericnumerics.asp[^]
Quote: The solution uses the fact that constraining type parameters using interfaces is not the same as casting to interfaces. Calling a method using an interface has the overhead of dynamic method dispatch, but calling a method on a type parameter that is constrained by an interface has no such overhead.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
Let me know about the basics of windows Remoting & COM programming.Regards.
Raihan Masud
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to take a look here.
Regards,
mav
--
Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...
|
|
|
|
|
i have a webpage with asp button. in server side, i wrote some code for its button click event to delete the page data.
but in client side i want user to confirm the deletion action. so i write this javascript code:
{if(confirm("do want to delete data...."))}
i don't know what to do to prevent page postback for false condition.
what should i do...
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
{if(!confirm("do want to delete data....")) return;
else do();}
|
|
|
|
|
i now 'if' parts and what 'return' does.
the thing that i don't know is how to stop my page from postback. but now i found it. to know that refer to my reply to guffa
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
Return a boolean in the click event of the button:
onclick="return confirm('Delete?');"
If the event returns false, the button click is stopped.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks alot.
but your sample code doesn't work or atleast i couldn't understand you and apply your method.
but i found another method in other forum. here it is...
{
if(confirm('do you want to delete?') return true;
if(document.all && window.event) event.returnValue = false;
return false;
}
it works so much better and do what exactly i wanted.
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
The code that I wrote does work, but the backwards way that this forum uses for "security" changed it. 
Remove the * in the code:
o*nclick="return confirm('Delete?');"
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to make a for statement that displays the divide by sums like this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
4......
2 / 2 =
4 / 2 =
6 / 2 =
8......
Up until 5. How can i make that in a for statement?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
If you want help with your code, don't you think that you should at least make an attempt at writing any first? 
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guffa,
I did! Just didn't worked out. This is what i had
for (int i = 1; i < 11; i++)
{
for(int j = 1; j < 11; j++)
{
answer = i / j;
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
This is okay, why doesn't it work?
Replace answer = i / j; with Console.WriteLine(j/i); to see the output.
Note that I replaced i/j through j/i, so that the divisions have a more readable order.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Greeeg,
I guess it works but not the way i liked it to be.
It suppose to print this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
4 / 1 =
etc.
2 / 2 =
4 / 2 =
6 / 2 =
etc.
3 / 3 =
6 / 3 =
9 / 3 =
etc.
4 / 4 =
8 / 4 =
12 / 4 =
etc.
5 / 5 =
10 / 5 =
15 / 5 =
20 / 5 =
etc.
But instead of printing it like this, it prints this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
etc.
1 / 2 =
2 / 2 =
3 / 2 =
etc
1 / 3 =
2 / 3 =
3 / 3 =
etc
Like this up until "x / 10 =".
Do i have to make anther for statement in those 2 for statements?
|
|
|
|
|
Somehow like this:
for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 1; j < 5; j++)
{
for (int k = j; k < j*5; k+=j)
{
Console.WriteLine(k + "/" + i);
}
}
}
It's bugged, but I don't know where the error is right now.
Just play around a bit with it.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
