|
Jinal Desai - LIVE wrote: I don't think it is possible to detect vehicle from image/video.
Jinal Desai - LIVE wrote: Obviously you can.
Make your mind up?
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
|
|
|
|
|
Jinal Desai - LIVE wrote: But in current scenario for "ruknil" it is equivalent to
impossible ( I M Possible).
How do you suddenly know about the situation ruknil is in?
This was his first question, and his bio data is sparse - either you know him personally, or you are guessing that he is a complete beginner, and has insufficient experience.
If you mean "I don't think you can do it because I can't" then say that. But do not assume the experience or ability level of any poster based on his first question.
Just replying "it's not possible" as you did when it patently is possible (although complex) gives the wrong impression about this site, and a certain impression about you.
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give you the answer I gave somebody else when they asked about automatic numperplate recognition (ANPR):
"Unfortunately, you aren't going to be given the code to do this as this is a hugely complicated area, with commercial systems going for huge amounts of money. Typically ANPR systems make use of several stages to identify the number plate, these stages being:
1. Plate location. This step is responsible for identifying where the plate is in a picture.
2. Plate translation. Orienting and sizing the image, compensating for skew.
3. Image normalisation. Adjusting the brightness/contrast of the image.
4. Segmentation. Finding the characters themselves (i.e. removing items such as flags).
5. Optical Character Recognition.
Now, ANPR requires cameras to take pictures at very high speeds, and requires the processing to take place very quickly, which means that .NET is probably not going to be the most appropriate choice for processing the image (which typically requires sub-second processing). Typically these systems are written in C++ or C, are highly optimised and make use of image processing techniques such as edge detection and sharpening filters."
Now, just because you aren't going to be given the code doesn't mean that it's experimental. Police forces around the world are using this successfully right now - and courts accept this as evidence; something that wouldn't happen if they judged it experimental. More importantly, you can't judge successfully whether or not it's beyond the OPs experience - he may be a genius just looking for a little nudge.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Ummmm[^][^]
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have a question as to where to begin with what I'd like to to in a datagridview. The datagridview is bound to a dataset data table. One of the columns is a combobox. I want another column that is also a combobox too, but filtered based upon the selection of the first combobox.
Ex.
Column 1
Force
Column 2
lb
N
ton
or
Column 1
Torque
Column 2
in-lb
N-m
etc, etc.
My initial thought is to have an if loop that build the collection in the second combobox based upon the selection of the first. However, I don't know where this would go (even if that were to be the most efficient way to do it). Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to start from here.
|
|
|
|
|
You should try ItemDatabound event to populate the second DropDownList
protected void dgEmpleados_ItemDataBound(object sender, DataGridItemEventArgs e)
{
DataTable dt = (DataTable)((DataGrid)sender).DataSource;
if (dt.Rows.Count > 0 && e.Item.ItemIndex > -1)
{
((CheckBox)e.Item.Cells[0].FindControl("chkSeleccionar")).Checked =
Convert.ToBoolean( dt.Rows[e.Item.ItemIndex][_COL_SELECCIONAR].ToString());
((TextBox)e.Item.Cells[0].FindControl("txtGridObservaciones")).Text =
dt.Rows[e.Item.ItemIndex][_COL_OBSERVACIONES].ToString();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
1)create a dataTable to store all the posibilities, something like this:
Option1 - Option2
Force lb
Force N
Force ton
Torque in-lb
... ...
2)Bind this table to your second comboBox via a bindingSource.
3)On selectedIndexChanged at your first comboBox, apply a filter to your second comboBox (something like "Option1 = " + comboBox1.Text, but adapt it to a dataGridView).
The good points to thins method is that you can store the filtering posibilities in the database (like this, or based on primary keys).
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Stanciu Vlad wrote: apply a filter to your second comboBox (something like "Option1 = " + comboBox1.Text, but adapt it to a dataGridView).
I have the following filtering method:
private void GetRowsByFilter()
{
string expression;
expression = "MeasureType = 'Force'";
DataRow[] foundRows;
foundRows = table.Select(expression);
for (int i = 0; i < foundRows.Length; i++)
{
Debug.WriteLine(foundRows[i][0] + "test");
}
}
I am calling this method in my comboBox SelectedIndexChanged.
With that I do get the number of rows returned that matches Force in Debug.Writeline, but not sure how to filter the 2nd ComboBox display member. Do you have any thoughts on this?
|
|
|
|
|
You can use BindingSource to bind a dataTable to almost any control.
BindingSource bsOrders = new BindingSource();
bsOrders.DataSource = Dataset1;
bsOrders.DataMember = "Orders"
Bind the comboBoxColumn in the gridview to this binding source (if you don't know how check google, it's full of this stuff)
Then in the comboBox SelectedIndexChanged event you can directly filter the data using
if(filterText == string.Empty)
bsOrders.Filter = string.Empty;
else
bsOrders.Filter = "Option1 = " + filterText;
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
public void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
DataTable tblPrimary = dataSet1.Tables.Add("Primary");
tblPrimary.Columns.Add("Type");
tblPrimary.Rows.Add("Force");
tblPrimary.Rows.Add("Torque");
tblPrimary.Rows.Add("Pressure");
DataTable tblSecondary = dataSet1.Tables.Add("Secondary");
tblSecondary.Columns.Add("Primary_Type");
tblSecondary.Columns.Add("Unit");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Force", "lb");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Force", "N");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Force", "oz");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Torque", "in-lb");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Torque", "oz-in");
tblSecondary.Rows.Add("Torque", "N-m");
dataGridView1.DataSource = tblSecondary;
DataGridViewComboBoxColumn col = new DataGridViewComboBoxColumn();
col.DataSource = tblPrimary;
col.ValueMember = "Type";
dataGridView1.Columns.Add(col);
DataGridViewComboBoxColumn col2 = new DataGridViewComboBoxColumn();
col2.DataSource = tblSecondary;
col2.ValueMember = "Unit";
dataGridView1.Columns.Add(col2);
}
private void primaryCB_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (dataGridView1.CurrentCell.ColumnIndex == 0)
{
ComboBox cb = sender as ComboBox;
if (cb != null)
{
Debug.WriteLine(cb.SelectedValue + "TEST");
BindingSource bsSecondary = new BindingSource();
bsSecondary.DataSource = dataSet1.Tables["tblSecondary"];
string filter = string.Format("Primary_Type = {0}", cb.SelectedValue);
bsSecondary.Filter = filter;
Debug.WriteLine(filter);
}
}
}
private void dataGridView1_EditingControlShowing(object sender, DataGridViewEditingControlShowingEventArgs e)
{
if (dataGridView1.CurrentCell.ColumnIndex == 0)
{
ComboBox cb = e.Control as ComboBox;
if (cb != null)
{
cb.SelectedIndexChanged -= primaryCB_SelectedIndexChanged;
cb.SelectedIndexChanged += primaryCB_SelectedIndexChanged;
}
}
}
modified on Monday, May 24, 2010 2:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
BindingSource secondTableBindingSource = new BindingSource();
public void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) {
DataGridViewComboBoxColumn col = new DataGridViewComboBoxColumn();
col.DataSource = tblPrimary;
col.ValueMember = "Type";
dataGridView1.Columns.Add(col);
secondTableBindingSource.DataSource = tblSecondary;
DataGridViewComboBoxColumn col2 = new DataGridViewComboBoxColumn();
col2.DataSource = secondTableBindingSource;
col2.ValueMember = "Unit";
dataGridView1.Columns.Add(col2);
}
private void primaryCB_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (dataGridView1.CurrentCell.ColumnIndex == 0)
{
ComboBox cb = sender as ComboBox;
if (cb != null)
{
if(cb.SelectedValue != null)
secondTableBindingSource.Filter = string.Format("Primary_Type = '{0}'", cb.SelectedValue);
else
secondTableBindingSource.Filter = string.Empty;
}
}
}
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Stanciu Vlad wrote: secondTableBindingSource.DataSource = tblSecondary;
This results in creating a table in the dataGridView that has i Rows + 1 (the +1 is the default row for the next entry), which are all blank. In this case it adds the 6 rows that correspond to 'tblSecondary.Rows.Add', but the rows added are blank. The first comboBox does allow you to drop down the three selections, but the row will remain blank. However, the filter will eliminate all rows except for a number of rows pertaining to the number of items in the filtered 'Units' column. But again they are blank, but you can at least select one and have it write to the cell. And last, but not least, selecting on the next row, 1st column comboBox throws an "Object reference not set to an instance of an object".
Unless you see something obvious here and can prod me in that direction, I have spent way too much time on trying to get this to work and it probably makes sense to throw out what I've tried and start from scratch. I thought this was going to be a bit more straightforward, but alas...... 
|
|
|
|
|
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
DataTable mainData = new DataTable("mainData");
mainData.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("ValueType", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("ValueUnitOfMeasurement", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("TheValue", typeof(decimal));
DataTable valueType = new DataTable("valueType");
valueType.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
valueType.Columns.Add("Description", typeof(string));
DataTable valueUnitOfMeasurement = new DataTable("valueUnitOfMeasurement");
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Columns.Add("ValueTypeID", typeof(int));
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Columns.Add("Description", typeof(string));
valueType.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, "Force" });
valueType.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, "Torque" });
valueType.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, "Pressure" });
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, 1, "lb"});
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, 1, "N" });
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, 2, "N-m" });
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 4, 2, "in-lb" });
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 5, 3, "Pa" });
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] { 6, 3, "bar" });
dataGridView1.AutoGenerateColumns = false;
dataGridView1.DataSource = mainData;
valueTypeColumn.DataSource = valueType;
valueTypeColumn.ValueMember = "ID";
valueTypeColumn.DisplayMember = "Description";
myBinding.DataSource = valueUnitOfMeasurement;
valueUnitOfMeasurementColumn.DataSource = myBinding;
valueUnitOfMeasurementColumn.ValueMember = "ID";
valueUnitOfMeasurementColumn.DisplayMember = "Description";
dataGridView1.EditingControlShowing += new DataGridViewEditingControlShowingEventHandler(dataGridView1_EditingControlShowing);
dataGridView1.RowValidated += new DataGridViewCellEventHandler(dataGridView1_RowValidated);
}
void dataGridView1_RowValidated(object sender, DataGridViewCellEventArgs e)
{
myBinding.Filter = string.Empty;
}
void dataGridView1_EditingControlShowing(object sender, DataGridViewEditingControlShowingEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Control is ComboBox)
{
ComboBox editingControl = e.Control as ComboBox;
if (editingControl.DataSource is BindingSource)
{
if ((editingControl.DataSource as BindingSource).Equals(myBinding))
{
if(dataGridView1.CurrentRow == null)
return;
int selectedID;
bool ok = Int32.TryParse(Convert.ToString(dataGridView1.CurrentRow.Cells["valueTypeColumn"].Value), out selectedID);
if (ok)
myBinding.Filter = "ValueTypeID = " + selectedID;
else
myBinding.Filter = "ValueTypeID = -1";
return;
}
}
}
}
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently you took a look at the code I had in the previous post and said "enough is enough" or "I'll never be able to help that"?? 
A couple of questions:
Stanciu Vlad wrote: DataTable mainData = new DataTable("mainData");
mainData.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("ValueType", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("ValueUnitOfMeasurement", typeof(int));
mainData.Columns.Add("TheValue", typeof(decimal));
I can't see that this is doing anything accept providing a DataSource place marker for dataGridView1. In fact, all of the mainData.Columns.Add lines can be commented out without impacting the functionality.
In either case, it doesn't take long to add different types of measurements (Force, Torque, or Pressure) to have it begin to throw exceptions. Would you concur with this?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
mainData is the place where the data is stored. I said that you could persist this in a database. So if you did that then your table would look like that: with a reference to the ValueType table and a referece to the ValueUnitOfMeasurement on each row.
If you comment out all the mainData columns you would not have a place where to store the data entered in the grid and the grid would be empty.
So, if you add different types of measurements and do not bind them correctly the application will crash. In all the tables the ID column must be unique (numbers from 1 to n). In the valueUnitOfMeasurement table there is an ID column (that must be unique) and a reference to a valueType (stated in the valueType table). The reference is the ID of the valueType.
Let's assume you want to add a new measurement type named "Distance" with the units of measurement "km", "m", "cm", "mm".
The first step is to add the record in the ValueType table:
valueType.Rows.Add(new object[] {100, "Distance"});
Note that the row added is [100, "Distance"] - 100 is the Distance's ID (must be unique in the table).
Next you must add records in the ValueUnitOfMeasurement table:
valueType.Rows.Add(new object[] {500, 100, "km"});
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] {501, 100, "m"});
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] {502, 100, "cm"});
valueUnitOfMeasurement.Rows.Add(new object[] {503, 100, "mm"});
Note that the first row added is [500, 100, "km"] - 500 is the UnitOfMeasurement's ID and 100 is the valueType's ID correspondind to this unit of measurement (A couple of lines above we stated that for distance 100 is the ID).
The logic in my previous example filters the unit of measurements based on the selected value type ID in the valueType combo box. This supports an logically unlimited number of measurement types and units of measure. Also this supports persistance (database or xml).
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
from:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/winformsdatacontrols/thread/6f6c2632-afd7-4fe9-8bf3-c2c8c08d1a31/[^]
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
DataTable tblPrimary, tblSecondary;
BindingSource primaryBS, filteredSecondaryBS, unfilteredSecondaryBS;
public Form1()
{
tblPrimary = new DataTable("Primary");
tblPrimary.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
tblPrimary.Columns.Add("Name", typeof(string));
tblSecondary = new DataTable("Secondary");
tblSecondary.Columns.Add("ID", typeof(int));
tblSecondary.Columns.Add("subID", typeof(int));
tblSecondary.Columns.Add("Name", typeof(string));
tblPrimary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 0, "Force" });
tblPrimary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, "Torque" });
tblPrimary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, "Pressure" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 0, 0, "lb" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 1, 0, "N" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 2, 0, "oz" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 3, 1, "in-lb" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 4, 1, "ft-lb" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 5, 1, "N-m" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 6, 2, "PSI" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 7, 2, "Pa" });
tblSecondary.Rows.Add(new object[] { 8, 2, "bar" });
InitializeComponent();
primaryBS = new BindingSource();
primaryBS.DataSource = tblPrimary;
primaryComboBoxColumn.DataSource = primaryBS;
primaryComboBoxColumn.DisplayMember = "Name";
primaryComboBoxColumn.ValueMember = "ID";
unfilteredSecondaryBS = new BindingSource();
DataView undv = new DataView(tblSecondary);
unfilteredSecondaryBS.DataSource = undv;
secondaryComboBoxColumn.DataSource = unfilteredSecondaryBS;
secondaryComboBoxColumn.DisplayMember = "Name";
secondaryComboBoxColumn.ValueMember = "ID";
filteredSecondaryBS = new BindingSource();
DataView dv = new DataView(tblSecondary);
filteredSecondaryBS.DataSource = dv;
}
private void dataGridView1_CellBeginEdit(object sender, DataGridViewCellCancelEventArgs e)
{
if (e.ColumnIndex == secondaryComboBoxColumn.Index)
{
DataGridViewComboBoxCell dgcb = (DataGridViewComboBoxCell)dataGridView1[e.ColumnIndex, e.RowIndex];
dgcb.DataSource = filteredSecondaryBS;
this.filteredSecondaryBS.Filter = "subid = " +
this.dataGridView1[e.ColumnIndex - 1, e.RowIndex].Value.ToString();
}
}
private void dataGridView1_CellEndEdit(object sender, DataGridViewCellEventArgs e)
{
if (e.ColumnIndex == this.secondaryComboBoxColumn.Index)
{
DataGridViewComboBoxCell dgcb = (DataGridViewComboBoxCell)dataGridView1[e.ColumnIndex, e.RowIndex];
dgcb.DataSource = unfilteredSecondaryBS;
this.filteredSecondaryBS.RemoveFilter();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok if it works. I's kind of based on the principle stated by me in a previous post. The filter logic is a little diferent, it's a different approach.
Just as a note:
1. a bindingSource does aproximatively the same thing as a dataView (if not the same), so there is no reason to bind to the bindingSource a dataView binded to a dataTable. You could bind the table directly to the bindingSource.
2. having a filtered and an unfiltered bindingSource is the same as having a bindingSource that can be filtered or unfiltered. 
3. I think that if you change the datasource of a control the current selected value is lost (not sure, but this would seam logic to me)
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Were you not getting exceptions after adding a couple of Force rows and then select a Torque row?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall, but if in certain conditions you get an exception then you've found a bug
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I wanted to ask if it is possible to do something like this and how to do it:
I would like to have a xml structure like this:
<root>
<collection>
<element />
<element attribute="value" />
<element />
</collection>
<something />
<somethingother />
</root>
The elements in the collection should be of the type ElementBase if the attribute is not set or of the type ElementDerived if the attribute is set to a value (the second element).
So the Deserialized collection should be something like:
List<ElementBase> collection = new List<ElementBase>() { new ElementBase(), new ElementDerived(), new ElementBase() };
ElementDerived would be derived from ElementBase:
class ElementDerived : ElementBase {}
I hope my question is described clearly.
Thanks for your help ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Roland
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is possible if you write your own custom xml deserializer.
Based on your xml rules build the deserialization rules and then, at the parsing of element nodes, check if there is an atribute defined, and based on the result instantiate your element class.
But I don't understand why you want to use something like this (inheritance), why not just put a flag in the base class (a bool flag, or an enum flag) to diferentiate between the two element types?
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
i have an application in a machine and i want to make access on it through an other machine , how can i make that,plz help ?
|
|
|
|
|
it depends on what information you will be passing between the aplications, and your architecture - for example, if you have an application on a machine, lets call that the server side, how many other computers 'clients' are going to be connecting to the server and requesting services or transferring data
- I would start looking at remoteing, wcf type technologies - ie, you possibly need to start thinking about tcp/ip sockets type connectivity, and there are easy and hard ways to do that depending on your requirements.
Its harder to give you a better answer without a more detailed description of what you are trying to achieve, sorry
'g'
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
