|
Nice requirements !
No memory stick has been harmed during establishment of this signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not cross post
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
|
|
|
|
|
And what do you want from us?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everybody.
I have migrated my software from VS2005 to VS2010, and when debugging my windows services, trying to attach to the process I get this error:
"Unable to attach to the process. Visual Studio has insufficient privileges to debug this process. To debug this process, Visual Studio must be run as an administrator."
So, I run it as an administrator, I checked the permission on VSLauncher.exe and devenv.exe to make it run always as an admin, but I still get the error.
I am an administrator already. Has anybody have this same problem?
BTW, I'm using W7, VS2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try Opening the application as with Run as Administrator? And does the service also run in the same account ?
Sastry
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your answer Sastry.
Yes, I tried selecting the box "Run as administrator" on the Visual Studio launcher, and also tried with right click -> Run as administrator. The top of the window says "Visual Studio 2010 (Administrator)" . And the service is running in my user.
I don't know why is this still happening. Any other idea?
First I thought that the problem was to try to debug the code on the network, but I also copied the solution to my C: and it still happens.
|
|
|
|
|
It was a permissions problem.
Win7 comes with a new security system, and I had to add to my profile (even being an admin) this permission:
Control panel -> Administrative tools -> Local Security policy -> Local Policies -> User rights Assignment -> Debug programs -> Add user or group .
And there, I added my own user. Reboot machine(Important!! Without rebooting, it won't work).
After that, I was able to attach processes to debug them. It's been a really long time to solve this, I hope to help other people that find this same problem.
Thanks everybody for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have created a database inside the windows application project.Now i am trying to insert data into that database 'database.mdf'.But data are not inserted as well as not showing error also.But same code is working for inserting data in database which one i created outside the visual studio using sql server management tool.Why is the problem?
|
|
|
|
|
may be your sql command query problem!!! show me your code then i may help u
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want help then post any further information here, so it is available for everyone to see. Do not try to create private message threads.
Binding 100,000 items to a list box can be just silly regardless of what pattern you are following. Jeremy Likness
|
|
|
|
|
Debug through your source code, pick up the query from the code and then run it in SQL Server management studio.
This should give you a fair idea of what you might be doing wrong with the query.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harsha Dev wrote: xxxx@gmail.com
I would recommend you remove your email id to avoid being hit by tons of spam.
|
|
|
|
|
ok abhinav i will remove... thanks
|
|
|
|
|
set the "copy to output directory" property of the database file within visual studio to "Copy if newer", visual studio copies your database to the output directory whenever you build your solution, because of this, if you run your application and insert some data, when you run it again, your database will be copied again to the output directory and you will lose your data. to test without changing properties, go to your project folder, inside the /bin/Debug folder and start your app from here. your data should be here on the second run.
sorry for my english, i expect that you can understand.
I'm brazilian and english (well, human languages in general) aren't my best skill, so, sorry by my english. (if you want we can speak in C# or VB.Net =p)
|
|
|
|
|
this is my array variable,
int[] x = null;
x = new int[10];
int[] y = null;
y = new int[10];
and this is my random function,
private int Randomize(int MinValue, int MaxValue)
{
Random Random = new Random();
return Random.Next(MinValue, MaxValue);
}
this is how i random all of that variable,
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
x[i] = Randomize(1, 60);
y[i] = Randomize(1, 10);
}
and the result is,
x[0] = 42 y[0] = 3
x[1] = 42 y[1] = 3
x[2] = 42 y[2] = 3
x[3] = 42 y[3] = 3
x[4] = 42 y[4] = 3
x[5] = 42 y[5] = 3
x[6] = 42 y[6] = 3
x[7] = 42 y[7] = 3
x[8] = 42 y[8] = 3
x[9] = 42 y[9] = 3
am i missing something in my random function?
i've searched it in google and still found Random.Next()
** MODIFIED
i found out in google that Random.Next generating same value because I execute it at the same time.
so i put like this,
private int Randomize(int MinValue, int MaxValue)
{
Thread.Sleep(100);
Random Random = new Random();
return Random.Next(MinValue, MaxValue);
}
nah this time the value disorder epicly,
but yes i have to wait,
keep searching for other way,
and please someone help me.
Thanks before,
VK
modified 19-Apr-12 0:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK you only need to instantiate the Random class once, outside your loop, then in your loop you can call Random.Next(). Also try seeding it with DateTime.Now.
|
|
|
|
|
int[] x = new int[10];
int[] y = new int[10];
Random r = new Random();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
x[i] = Randomize(r, 1, 60);
y[i] = Randomize(r, 1, 10);
}
private int Randomize(Random r, int minValue, int maxValue)
{
return r.Next(minValue, maxValue);
}
should do the trick.
Not only will it ensure that you get (pseudo)random integer series, but also it will execute faster since you don't create a new Random everytime you call the Randomize() method.
No memory stick has been harmed during establishment of this signature.
|
|
|
|
|
good topic
|
|
|
|
|
hey guys does any one have a simple source code to create a really simple memory leak?
|
|
|
|
|
Use an unmanaged resource and dont dispose it. This will create a possible form of memory leak.
|
|
|
|
|
My vote of 5 for to the point answer
Happy Coding...
|
|
|
|
|
|