|
That code is correct, but I have no idea if the surrounding code is correct, so that the buffer, receive, _sock and result variables are correct.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
I might as well archive the project and attach it But anyways. I don't mind
private System.Byte[] buffer=new Byte[1024];
private void SetupReceiveCallback(Socket _sock)
{
AsyncCallback receive=new AsyncCallback(OnReceive);
_sock.BeginReceive(buffer,0,buffer.Length,SocketFlags.None,receive,_sock);
}
private void OnReceive(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
Socket _sock=(Socket)result.AsyncState;
int stop=_sock.EndReceive(result);
String str=System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(buffer,0,stop);
MessageBox.Show(str);
process(buffer,stop);
SetupReceiveCallback(_sock);
}
catch
{
MessageBox.Show("Out");
this.Close();
}
}
So?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys
Does anyone know an open source library for skinned windows controls written in C#?.
Thanks in advance
Mahmoud Zidan
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to figure out how to list all user accounts that exist in the SAM. I have figured out how to get the account name of the owner of a file, but not a list of all accounts on the machine.
Thanks for helping.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to take a look at this article[^].
Regards,
mav
--
Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...
|
|
|
|
|
My C# book reads:
In this example, the two-parameter constructor executes before any code in the body of the one-parameter constructor (though in this particular case, since there is no code in the body of the one-parameter con-structor, it makes no difference).
By following through the code it seems that the one-parameter constructor is called first, which in turn calls the two-parameter constructor, so, is this an error, or do you think it might have another meaning?
J.
using System;
using TestConsole.TestClasses;
namespace TestConsole.ConsoleCmds
{
public class TestOne
{
public static void Main()
{
Car myCar = new Car("Proton Persona");
}
}
}
namespace TestConsole.TestClasses
{
class Car
{
private string description;
private uint nWheels;
public Car(string model, uint nWheels)
{
this.description = description;
this.nWheels = nWheels;
}
public Car(string model) : this(model, 4) { }
}
}
Jon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jon,
it is the one-parm constructor that gets invoked first, but it is the body of
the 2-parm one that executes before the (empty) body of the 1-parm constructor.
Same prder as the code that says: Car(model) needs "this(model,4)" before it does the "{ }".
BTW if you use <pre>some code</pre> you can show code snippets
that preserve their formatting (mainly indentation). That would be much more readable.
On the other hand, if your post contains special characters (especially <)
they get eaten by the HTML interpreter, then you better would check the "ignore HTML tags"
checkbox below the textbox (but then thr pre command will no longer work either).
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply.... you mean this is readable?
class Car
{
private string description;
private uint nWheels;
public Car(string model, uint nWheels)
{
this.description = description;
this.nWheels = nWheels;
}
public Car(string model) : this(model, 4) { }
}
Jon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jon, you're welcome. Yes, it is much more readable like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: if you use
some code you can show code snippets
that preserve their formatting
If I may add, I like to put <code> and </code> tags inside the <pre> tags. Just colors it up nice
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
I'll try that next time; I once did just <code> and was not happy about the result. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
<code> by itself doesn't do much, at least when it comes to preserving indentation.
Here is a simple example of how I do it...
private bool foo(int x)
{
if ( x < 0 )
return true;
else
return false;
}
I like it because it makes the code stand out a bit better.
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, it's a dark red color?
I made a test message with and without <code>, and I couldn't see any difference at all.
I made a screen dump and pasted in photoshop, where I could put them in different layers on top of each other so that I could flip between them and see exactly what the difference was, but there was no difference.
Or was it? Maybe there was a slight difference? I had to use the eyedropper to get the color of the text to tell what the difference was...
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using <code> before or after the <pre> tag? It will make a difference.
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
The code tag is inside the pre tag.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Paul,
the problem with your examples is they show result, not source.
Anyway, I did my little experiment and I observed:
PRE gives non-proportional font, pink background, and preservation of spaces and tabs
CODE gives non-proportional font, red foreground (hardly noticable), and when copying several
lines then newlines are lost.
for both: the optional "lang=cs" does not do anything.
My conclusion:
- I will continue to use PRE without CODE for blocks of code, (so one can copy them easily)
- I will occasionally use CODE without PRE inside a text alinea to quote a piece of
code that fits on a single line (so the newline-not-copied problem isnt relevant).
Does this match your view on things ?
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
This whole thing is strange. I just did <code><pre> and it shows orange background with black text, which is what I think Guffa was talking about; then doing <pre><code> yields orange background with red text.
Luc Pattyn wrote: Does this match your view on things ?
I see your point, and good case you've made with when to use <pre> and <code>.
I think the "lang=cs" is for articles, not 100% sure. as far as new lines go, I haven't seen anything go awry. I tried FF, IE, and Safari and can't really draw a conclusion on my configuration
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: I think the "lang=cs" is for articles, not 100% sure
Yes, I got it from the article manual, but decided to give it a try anyway. Would look
great on discussion forum too...
OK, I am taking this opportunity to add some more test cases:
public void nihil(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
public void pre(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
<br />
public void code(int a) {<br />
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");<br />
}<br />
public void precode(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
public void codepre(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Same stuff with "ignore HTML tags":
<blockquote class="FQ"><div class="FQA">Paul Conrad wrote:</div>I think the "lang=cs" is for articles, not 100% sure</blockquote>
Yes, I got it from the article manual, but decided to give it a try anyway. Would look
great on discussion forum too...
OK, I am taking this opportunity to add some more test cases:
public void nihil(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
<pre>
public void pre(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
</pre>
<code>
public void code(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
</code>
<pre><code>
public void precode(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
</code></pre>
<code><pre>
public void codepre(int a) {
if (a!=0) throw new Exception("Not zero");
}
</pre></code>
Luc Pattyn
try { [Search CP Articles] [Search CP Forums] [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] }
catch { [Google] }
|
|
|
|
|
See my post I posted at the same time about the CPSyntax. On my laptop anything you have inside the code tags are showing up white/light blue alternating lines. Anything in just the pre tag by itself is showing up with light blue background/red text...
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: I just did
and it shows orange background with black text, which is what I think Guffa was talking about
Nope.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
What do you get? I think Luc and I are trying to figure it out right now. We have have to ask Chris
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
If you ask Chris for some clarification and improvements, I'll second that.
Possible improvements:
support copy-with-newlines after code tag;
syntax coloring;
ignore all tags inside pre or code tag (so < and > remain intact inside code).
BTW: on IE6 (the only one I use) I dont see any difference between pre-code and code-pre.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: IE6
Hmmm, I have IE7, haven't used IE6 since IE7 came out.
The ideas you've mentioned for improvement could work
"Any sort of work in VB6 is bound to provide several WTF moments." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Conrad wrote: I have IE7, haven't used IE6 since IE7 came out
I am happy with my current set of security holes. Dont need new features/creatures.
|
|
|
|